PDA

View Full Version : 3 LPGA Players to Pose Semi-Nude



Harry Longshanks
09-08-2009, 12:46 AM
Golf: Sirak: Overexposed? LPGA players posing semi-nude: Golf Digest Magazine (http://www.golfdigest.com/golfworld/columnists/2009/09/golf_espn_posing_semi_nude_sirak)


Overexposed?

The decision by three LPGA players to pose semi-nude in a magazine will undoubtedly draw some attention. But is it the kind of attention the tour wants?

By Ron Sirak
Photo by AP September 7, 2009

http://www.golfdigest.com/images/golfworld/2009/09/gwar01_090907_grezbien.jpg
Anna Grezbien (above) will join Christina Kim and Sandra Gal in a provocative photo
spread for ESPN the Magazine.

One of the double standards under which the LPGA has long had to operate is the criticism it endures any time one of its players promotes her sexuality in any way. Jan Stephenson in the bathtub full of golf balls and nothing else comes to mind, and more recently the calendar Natalie Gulbis debuted at the 2004 U.S. Women's Open that the USGA banned from its merchandise tent.

The women's tour will no doubt get a triple-whammy of attention -- both wanted and unwanted -- next month when three of its players appear in ESPN the Magazine in tastefully covered states of undress. An LPGA executive said Sunday that Sandra Gal, a second year player from Germany by way of the University of Florida, Anna Grzebien, a second year player from Duke, and Christina Kim, who is in her seventh year on tour, will appear in the Oct. 19 "Bodies" issue of ESPN the Magazine.

http://www.golfdigest.com/images/index/090907_gal_kim_grzebian_180.jpg

The special theme issue, sort of a response by ESPN to the highly successful Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue, will celebrate both the male and female athlete. A source familiar with the issue says Dwight Howard of the Orlando Magic and tennis star Serena Williams will be on the cover. The three LPGA players will appear with golf-themed items -- carts, clubs etc. -- covering strategic parts. But as always happens in these cases, more attention will fall on the female athletes and they will somehow be seen as undermining the credibility of their sports, a charge never leveled at male athletes in beefcake poses.

The LPGA is already taking a proactive position to deflect any criticism. "ESPN The Magazine is one of the premier sports publications in the world, and they will put extensive promotional muscle behind this issue," said LPGA chief communications officer David Higdon. "So unless we get surprised by the nature of the shoot and/or feature positioning, then I expect this issue and our involvement in it will provide considerable exposure for our sport at a time when we are ramping up for an exciting finish to the 2009 season."

Higdon was a frequent writer for ESPN the Magazine before he was hired by the LPGA earlier this year to help provide a consistent media voice for the tour amid the controversies surrounding then commissioner Carolyn Bivens, who was replaced after a player revolt following the loss of several tournaments. Ironically, the ESPN photo shoot is exactly the kind of attention for the tour of which Bivens would have approved. She was all about increasing the profile of the brand, even when it risked going against some of the traditions of the game -- like wearing clothes.

"We have not seen the photos nor will we see them in advance, per ESPN the Magazine policy," Higdon said. "However, we were briefed on the concept by the editors, and felt comfortable with it given the fun idea as well as the fact that numerous other leagues and sports also participated." Asked if appearing nude in the magazine would undermine the credibility of the LPGA Higdon said: "No, and I suspect the numerous male athletes who will be featured will not have to field the same questions/concerns."

Higdon said ESPN approached the three players individually and coordinated directly with them and their representatives. The tour did not speak with any of the players in advance of the photo shoot, nor did a tour representative attend the shoot, which was conducted last week during the CN Canadian Women's Open in Calgary, Canada. Gal, Grzebien and Kim were all competing in the Canadian Women's Open and were not immediately available for comment.

There will no doubt be divisions among the other players about the value of the photo display. There always has been in the past. The issue of how to market sexuality has always been a hot-button issue for the LPGA. Many players fear that doing anything that takes the focus off them as professional athletes will provide ammunition to those who like to poke fun at the tour. Several players, speaking anonymously, were troubled by the fact that Kim is a player representative on the LPGA Board of Directors, feeling her involvement sent the wrong message and implied member support of the photos. While the players may be divided on the matter, the tour hierarchy apparently is not.

"We support and encourage all our appealing, personable athletes to promote themselves and their sport in the process," said Higdon, who most likely was speaking with the approval of acting commissioner Marty Evans. "No group of pro athletes in all of sport offer fans a more diverse range of interesting personalities, and we want to showcase this huge asset to not just golf fans but sports fans worldwide. Working with ESPN The Magazine and their world-class editors and photographers was a tremendous opportunity that we're glad our players carefully considered and then chose to pursue."

The LPGA is at a critical juncture in its 59-year history. A perfect storm of expiring contracts, a troubled economy and alienation of some tournaments owners in the wake of the Bivens' regime has left the tour with only 16 tournaments, as of now, for 2010. It would be very easy to argue that anything that brings exposure to the tour -- no pun intended -- is a good thing. It is also a risky thing, but trouble times usually require risks.

The photos will almost certainly provide fodder for those who like to criticize the LPGA. And those who do so will unleash their venom with no regard for the double standard embodied in their thinking. Left unanswered is only this: How come NBA commissioner David Stern won't have to field similar questions about the involvement of Howard undermining the credibility of his league?

oblongfungus
09-08-2009, 03:51 AM
Golf: Sirak: Overexposed? LPGA players posing semi-nude: Golf Digest Magazine (http://www.golfdigest.com/golfworld/columnists/2009/09/golf_espn_posing_semi_nude_sirak)


It did seem like Christina Kim had been getting slimmer lately. Wonder if the photo shoot had anything to do with it?

Anyway, good for them.

Geezer
09-08-2009, 05:44 AM
tastefully covered states of undress
Basically meaning you don't see anything. So I don't see how anyone could have a problem with it, provbided the players were comfortable doing it in the first place.

You probably know what's coming, so If you know you won't like it, don't look.
Anna Grzebien, :D
Sandra Gal, :D
Christina Kim, :bulgy-eyes:

JB
09-08-2009, 07:55 AM
This is no worse than a mens player with no shirt on. People should not complain at all about this.

GolferGal
09-08-2009, 08:39 AM
This is no worse than a mens player with no shirt on. People should not complain at all about this.

I agree but you know someone will have something to say about this. I can only imagine what the feminists will have to say.

Diane
09-08-2009, 09:02 AM
Given that it's an ESPN magazine and not an LPGA magazine, I don't think 3 golfers posing will help or hinder the LPGA as they try to reposition themselves.

barruda
09-08-2009, 09:07 AM
Geeze - I hope there is an article with those photo's......

Hanks
09-08-2009, 09:23 AM
Whatever works for them. The LPGA needs any sort of attention it can get as it tries to put the ousting of their commish behind them.

GenErr
09-08-2009, 10:30 AM
I don't understand why this would be such a big deal! If you got it, and are comfortable with it, flaunt it! :clapp:

I haven't seen any photos, nor will I buy any magazine to see them, but I'll bet we've all seen more at the beach on a weekend afternoon.

soxngolf
09-08-2009, 10:39 AM
This is no worse than a mens player with no shirt on. People should not complain at all about this.

I agree with GG, they shouldn't complain, but they will. I have never really thought about it, but when the guys take their clothes off (I am currently thinking David Beckham) no one says, he isn't a serious athlete or that is taking away from his focus on the sport. Why is it always said about women? It is an interesting thought.

GolferGal
09-08-2009, 10:45 AM
I agree with GG, they shouldn't complain, but they will. I have never really thought about it, but when the guys take their clothes off (I am currently thinking David Beckham) no one says, he isn't a serious athlete or that is taking away from his focus on the sport. Why is it always said about women? It is an interesting thought.

My thoughts and feelings exactly Soxy.

soxngolf
09-08-2009, 10:45 AM
By the way, Christina Kim had tweeted about this last week, but wouldn't give any details. Interesting last post though!


Done practicing n playing. Headed to a photo shoot in about 90 minutes

Can't bring cell phones or cameras at all to the set, so sorry, can't share any of it :-/

Finished with my shoot. Ended up being a lot of fun. So much time spent on makeup!! Insane!

Only shot I can share with you guys. This is pre shoot, as I head to the location. Sorry that's all I got! Twitpic - Share photos on Twitter (http://twitpic.com/g5oei)

Can't share info regarding the shoot just yet folks, will do when I'm granted permission though!! :-) just know it was... Unique!! :-)

Dudes, get off it. Wasn't for Playboy, I don't roll that way. I'm not like that OR fit enough to even conceive the notion of that! Gross!!

Craig Mac
09-08-2009, 10:46 AM
Christina Kim....:confused2: I think I just threw up in my mouth a little bit:sick: Hope those guys are good at photoshop!

Harry Longshanks
09-08-2009, 10:46 AM
I like that headcover in the background. Pom/modern combo.

Harry Longshanks
09-08-2009, 10:49 AM
Christina Kim....:confused2: I think I just threw up in my mouth a little bit:sick: Hope those guys are good at photoshop!

She looks pretty ok to me.

http://i340.photobucket.com/albums/o325/HarryLongshanks/27138762.jpg

soxngolf
09-08-2009, 10:53 AM
I agree Harry, I think most people will be pleasantly surprised.

Craig Mac
09-08-2009, 10:54 AM
Well I knew that would draw that response from Harry....

Hanks
09-08-2009, 11:49 AM
definitely wouldn't throw her out of bed for eating cookies.... :clapp:

JB
09-08-2009, 12:00 PM
Many people can in certain poses. Heck John Daly does not look large if you just show his face nowadays. I love CK, but the thought of her naked is not something Im intrigued to see.

Diane
09-08-2009, 12:03 PM
I'm sure they'll show her assets in the best light with the added benefit of photoshop.

Geezer
09-08-2009, 12:06 PM
I doubt there will be many assets shown.
Coverd with a golf bag is more likely.

JPsuff
09-09-2009, 10:55 AM
Christina Kim

http://www.celebritywonder.com/picture/Christina_Kim/ChristinaKim_Grayson_7772007.jpg


-JP

Craig Mac
09-09-2009, 11:12 AM
Yeah, I can post pictures too, for every "good" one you people post I can find at least a dozen bad ones. Clever photography trick though... cover the face and show the clevage..

http://www.lamesports.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/christina-kim.jpg

Hanks
09-09-2009, 11:21 AM
I doubt there will be many assets shown.
Coverd with a golf bag is more likely.

Maybe throw a couple of head covers and ball markers on 'em and away we go! :clapp:

JPsuff
09-09-2009, 11:33 AM
Yeah, I can post pictures too, for every "good" one you people post I can find at least a dozen bad ones. Clever photography trick though... cover the face and show the clevage..

Trick or not, I'd rather look at the one I posted. :thumb:


-JP

C-Tech
09-09-2009, 12:15 PM
No one complained when it was Sonya Toms.....

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v678/ccdriver/Toms_600x600.jpg

Her Dad was sales rep for a firm that sold to me. He introduced himself the first time and noticed my office was filled with golf stuff. He said his Son in Law was a Pro golfer. I asked who, figuring it was someone obscure, but when he said David Toms, I said, "Your Sonya's Dad? Wow!" It just popped out. Fortunately, he started laughing.

TheGasman
09-09-2009, 01:11 PM
Yeah, I can post pictures too, for every "good" one you people post I can find at least a dozen bad ones. Clever photography trick though... cover the face and show the clevage..


Im with you Craig. I just cant get the bad images out of my head.
http://img.timeinc.net/golf/i/tours/2007/11/KimSatADTCannon_299x225.jpg

Geezer
09-09-2009, 01:35 PM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v678/ccdriver/Toms_600x600.jpg


That's not tasteful nudity though.
The feminazi's and old people will be peeved because the 'n' (as in nudity) word is used.

ClairefromClare
09-09-2009, 09:04 PM
Christina Kim's weight has yo-yoed quite a bit over the past few years. She's on the right end of the bell-shaped curver right now.

I am an avowed feminist. This wouldn't be my first choice for a marketing ploy, but I"m not offended.

Sir Shanksalot
09-09-2009, 09:09 PM
I think all the ladies look great in their own way and if this is what they want to do then more power to 'em. Those who don't like it.......don't look.:dazed:

GolferGal
09-09-2009, 09:24 PM
I think all the ladies look great in their own way and if this is what they want to do then more power to 'em. Those who don't like it.......don't look.:dazed:

Well said :clapp:

barruda
09-09-2009, 10:38 PM
I think all the ladies look great in their own way and if this is what they want to do then more power to 'em. Those who don't like it.......don't look.:dazed:


Well said :clapp:

Ummm - I think I might take a peek.

Harry Longshanks
10-07-2009, 08:37 PM
Rick Reilly has a column in the "Bodies Issue," which is the one that contains the photos of Kim, Grzebien, and Gal.

The entire article is worth a read - just for the last anecdote . . .

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/columns/story?columnist=reilly_rick&id=4534478


It can all be very awkward
I've seen my share of bodies -- players really like to share.

By Rick Reilly
ESPN The Magazine

So this is the body issue? Please.

I've spent more time around naked men than Jenna Jameson and the American Proctology Association combined.

Which is weird, because when I got into journalism I dreamed of winning Pulitzer Prizes, sending off breathless dispatches to a waiting nation and meeting scar-faced sources with Lugers in their trench coats.

I never thought I'd instead spend most of my time interviewing naked men with more hair than a Supercuts Dumpster. I once talked to then-Yankees slugger Jason Giambi as he mindlessly fondled the one piece of clothing he most often wore in the clubhouse, his lucky gold-lamé thong. I once spun out of a kneeling position at a locker and turned straight into former Steelers defensive tackle Kimo von Oelhoffen's butt. I once, riding along in a van, laptop open, interviewed golfer John Daly and happened to look up and see him holding his, er, Big Bertha in his hand and cackling.

Sometimes it was worse than just naked. When I was 25, I was stood up for a coffee-shop interview with the legendary Indiana basketball coach Bobby Knight. I finally managed to find Knight's room, knocked on the door and was met by him, half-asleep. "We were supposed to do an interview at 8?" I whispered.

Grumble, hiss, grumble.

Finally, the door opened. I was greeted by the great man's bare gluteus as he walked away to turn on the shower. "Make it fast," he growled.

After that too-revealing interview, it somehow got worse. Knight left the bathroom door open a sliver so he could still talk and take his morning grumpy. Apparently, I was about to do a Man on the Seat interview.

It can all be very awkward.

During his unforgettable playoff run in 2004, Red Sox slugger David Ortiz hit yet another crucial home run to win yet another crucial game. Afterward, the hulking Ortiz came out of the shower and began wading through the 50 or so of us waiting for him, wearing only a towel and a scowl. Suddenly, he spun around on this tiny, middle-aged, balding radio guy, leaned over him menacingly and growled, "Did you just look at my nipples?!?"

Fear froze the little guy like a Popsicle. He squeaked, "No."

Ortiz suddenly broke into a huge grin, slapped the little man on the back and said, "Why not?"

One caveat: A nude jock is not a defenseless jock.

In 1985, I interviewed Pete Rose across a shower curtain in the Cincinnati Reds manager's office as he chased Ty Cobb's all-time hits record. I was asking him, as he lathered up, how much he had lost at the horse track that year.

There arrived a chilling pause in the steamy room. Then Rose suddenly yelled, "You can't crucify Pete Rose!" and threw his shampoo bottle at me. This is why the built-in shampoo wall dispensers of today are such wonderful inventions, in my humble opinion.

Of course, some guys refuse to be interviewed naked, such as Kobe Bryant, Michael Jordan (who wouldn't even come to his locker until his tie was knotted) and running back Eddie George. "Maybe if I were endowed like some guys I've seen," George says now, "I'd come out stark naked, put my knee up on a table, face the crowd and go, 'Okay, who's first?' "

Other guys, though, would make excellent nudist camp directors. I'm still not sure I've ever seen Yankees outfielder Johnny Damon clothed while walking through a clubhouse. The man is naked more often than Michelangelo's David.

You just get numb to it. Athletes get dressed and undressed around one another all day, twice a day. They're used to constant nudity -- like nurses or masseuses or Rick Pitino.

And when they forget they're no longer in high school, we do our best to remind them.

One afternoon, Jenny Kellner, then of the New York Daily News, was covering the Jets. She entered the locker room only to find one of the team's stars buck naked. He walked up to her, pointed to his babymaker and said, "Hey, Jenny, do you know what this is?"

"Well," Kellner answered, with perfect aplomb, "it looks like a penis. Only smaller."

ClairefromClare
10-07-2009, 10:30 PM
+1,000 for Kellner.

Craig Mac
10-07-2009, 11:04 PM
Lame post Harry, no pics of the three mentioned, just an aticle about jocks naked..... Is that what u r in to nowadays???

Harry Longshanks
10-07-2009, 11:07 PM
Lame post Harry, no pics of the three mentioned, just an aticle about jocks naked..... Is that what u r in to nowadays???

The photos aren't online yet.

Harry Longshanks
10-10-2009, 05:14 AM
Here you go C-Mac:

http://mtblog.golfdigest.com/magazine/blogs/gdwoman/GDWLGPA-Golfers.jpg

oblongfungus
10-10-2009, 05:15 AM
Here you go C-Mac:

http://mtblog.golfdigest.com/magazine/blogs/gdwoman/GDWLGPA-Golfers.jpg

Not too bad.

bogeyme
10-10-2009, 09:41 AM
Here you go C-Mac:

http://mtblog.golfdigest.com/magazine/blogs/gdwoman/GDWLGPA-Golfers.jpg

That's semi nude? They sure look completely naked to me. They all look great though.

Geezer
10-10-2009, 11:04 AM
That's semi nude? They sure look completely naked to me. They all look great though.

It was never going to be semi-nude.
Tasteful nudity is when they are naked, but they might as well not be; you just can't see anything.

dynarider
10-10-2009, 11:39 AM
That's semi nude? They sure look completely naked to me. They all look great though.

I think they look a bit pasty.

v3.0
10-10-2009, 11:54 AM
I think that picture was reasonably tastily done.

Who is the golfer on the left?

Geezer
10-10-2009, 11:55 AM
Sandra Gal, I believe.

EDIT: Yes, she's the most attractive of the three, imo. :D

provisional
10-10-2009, 12:01 PM
Hmmmm, interesting. Too bad Marge Simpson isn't part of that group, after her Playboy cover page. It would make a good avatar for someone. :clapp:
Here you go C-Mac:

http://mtblog.golfdigest.com/magazine/blogs/gdwoman/GDWLGPA-Golfers.jpg

ClairefromClare
10-10-2009, 03:32 PM
Hmmmm, interesting. Too bad Marge Simpson isn't part of that group, after her Playboy cover page. It would make a good avatar for someone. :clapp:

I can take a hint... .

Osahar
10-10-2009, 05:10 PM
Nicely done picture. :clapp:

Diane
10-10-2009, 06:46 PM
I think they all look great in the photo and who doesn't like being nude - I know I do, but I don't quite get the point of the photo. What do the women gain from this? Do you guys really enjoy looking at a photo where you can't really see anything?

dynarider
10-10-2009, 09:39 PM
I think they all look great in the photo and who doesn't like being nude - I know I do, but I don't quite get the point of the photo. What do the women gain from this? Do you guys really enjoy looking at a photo where you can't really see anything?

I honestly don't like the picture, but then & i'm sure that i'm in the minority here, I prefer women dressed. Leaves a lot more to the imagination & that's a hell of a lot better than the real thing usually.

Harry Longshanks
10-10-2009, 09:41 PM
that's a hell of a lot better than the real thing usually.

I'm gonna have to go ahead and disagree with you there.

Diane
10-10-2009, 10:37 PM
I honestly don't like the picture, but then & i'm sure that i'm in the minority here, I prefer women dressed. Leaves a lot more to the imagination & that's a hell of a lot better than the real thing usually.

So let me get this straight Dyna - men want to see less, not more? Now, I'm very confused.

Esox
10-10-2009, 11:13 PM
Gal and Kim look like they're posing. The naked driver looks natural. Seems if you had them on the range hitting balls, maybe on the practice green, or even grilling some steaks it would lend some credibility. A volleyball game might be interesting. Who leans naked on a golf cart?

Kevin

Harry Longshanks
10-10-2009, 11:19 PM
Who leans naked on a golf cart?


What is 'who cares as long as they keep doing it,' Alex?

C-Tech
10-10-2009, 11:37 PM
I like the picture. I don't need full on frontal nudity, this is just fine. It leave a little to the imagination.

dynarider
10-11-2009, 09:33 AM
So let me get this straight Dyna - men want to see less, not more? Now, I'm very confused.

I like seeing women dressed vs naked, always have. Let's my imagination run wild.

C-Tech
10-11-2009, 10:53 AM
A picturesque redhead friend of mine played at Silver Dollar City in Branson in an old time country band. They were required to wear high-necked down to the floor dresses as part of that gig. She said it was always funny to her that women were walking around in tank tops and short shorts yet when she lifted her skirt 4" to go up a step, every guy in the area's head would snap around to get a peek.

Ladies, that says a lot about men's underlying psychology, including mine.

Graz
10-11-2009, 01:12 PM
At times it can be anti-climactic when you finally do see a woman in the buff. Curiosity is why woman seem to at times be more attractive when clothed. Intrigue can end once you have seen all of the goods.

vallogolfer
10-11-2009, 02:32 PM
The LPGA needs something to bring media attention... regardless of who it is I'm sure it will be tasteful and is at least making people talk about the tour. They need everything and anything.

provisional
10-11-2009, 04:38 PM
As the youngster say "kewl"
I can take a hint... .

bogeyme
10-12-2009, 09:20 AM
I like the picture. I don't need full on frontal nudity, this is just fine. It leave a little to the imagination.

Agreed. This picture was very tastefully done. I'm not real sure how it's going to help the LPGA other than people talking about the 3 naked chicks on the golf cart. It's not like these gals are playing golf naked this weekend on t.v.

Hanks
10-12-2009, 09:53 AM
Hmmmm...if I use the picture as my avatar will I get nasty PM's/negative rep points/etc.? :banghead:

bogeyme
10-12-2009, 10:34 AM
Hmmmm...if I use the picture as my avatar will I get nasty PM's/negative rep points/etc.? :banghead:

Not from this forum personality.

ClairefromClare
10-12-2009, 11:10 AM
Hmmmm...if I use the picture as my avatar will I get nasty PM's/negative rep points/etc.? :banghead:

Well, look at mine (though it wasn't my idea).

Diane
10-12-2009, 11:14 AM
Well, look at mine (though it wasn't my idea).

What were you saying the other day about free will Claire?

ClairefromClare
10-12-2009, 01:35 PM
What were you saying the other day about free will Claire?

All I said was that I didn't think it up first. Seemed like a pretty quirky idea, though.

VanillaEps
10-14-2009, 01:09 PM
Tasteful pic. I probably would have selected three different LPGA players.

Which three would you guys selected?

Here's my three:
- Anna Rawson
- Natalie Gulbis
- Paula Creamer

Harry Longshanks
10-14-2009, 01:21 PM
Tasteful pic. I probably would have selected three different LPGA players.

Which three would you guys selected?

Here's my three:
- Anna Rawson
- Natalie Gulbis
- Paula Creamer

They were probably asked and declined. Gulbis isn't even doing her swimsuit calendar any more.

Hanks
10-14-2009, 01:23 PM
Tasteful pic. I probably would have selected three different LPGA players.

Which three would you guys selected?

Here's my three:
- Anna Rawson
- Natalie Gulbis
- Paula Creamer

not bad, I like it! :blob:

TheGasman
10-14-2009, 02:00 PM
At times it can be anti-climactic when you finally do see a woman in the buff. Curiosity is why woman seem to at times be more attractive when clothed. Intrigue can end once you have seen all of the goods.

Im with you on that, unless they are wearing a Burka, which is not sexy.

http://weblog.javazen.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/10/burka.jpg

C-Tech
10-14-2009, 02:06 PM
Im with you on that, unless they are wearing a Burka, which is not sexy.

http://weblog.javazen.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/10/burka.jpg


I guess that depends on your point of view. Some Islamic guys might be having a bad case of the hots looking at this spoiler.

C-Tech
10-14-2009, 02:09 PM
Tasteful pic. I probably would have selected three different LPGA players.

Which three would you guys selected?

Here's my three:
- Anna Rawson
- Natalie Gulbis
- Paula Creamer

I'm thinking:

Mi Hyun Kim (I just think she is cute)
Suzanne Petersen (She does her best to hide it, but its there)
Anna Rawson (No explanation needed)

Harry Longshanks
10-14-2009, 02:10 PM
You guys are crazy. Naked is always better.

Not that clothed can't be hawt too (variety is good!), but there is so much more fun you can have with naked.

Harry Longshanks
10-14-2009, 04:12 PM
I never realized Sandra Gal was 6 feet tall.

LBlack14
10-17-2009, 12:10 PM
1 pic, that's it???