I just spent most of the morning comparing the burner 2.0 against the r9 and my old r7 xd. Frankly, the r7 xd is an amazing set. From 4 iron to pitching wedge it equals or beats both of the other TM sets for distance and forgiveness. However, the r7 xd falls on it's face on anything less than Full shots. The gap and SW are just too clunky.
The burner 2.0 improves this set by adding sleeker scoring irons. The only fault I could find with he 2.0's is that sometimes I would nuke a shot 10-15 yards past the norm. Simply out of the blue. Great irons otherwise.
I think I found my perfect set in the r9's. I had the 4-pw bent 1* strong to match the burners. I left the gap alone at 50* and then bent the sw from 55* to 53*, which takes out 2* of bounce. In this configuration, I was able to match the 2.0's distance while maintaining consistent distances and gaps. The sw also is my favorite club from 90 yards in. It's surprisingly nimble.
Mishits with the r9 are harsher than the others and stock grips are trash. I will definitely regrip and might even try some pro soft inserts to cushion the blow.
The burner 2.0 improves this set by adding sleeker scoring irons. The only fault I could find with he 2.0's is that sometimes I would nuke a shot 10-15 yards past the norm. Simply out of the blue. Great irons otherwise.
I think I found my perfect set in the r9's. I had the 4-pw bent 1* strong to match the burners. I left the gap alone at 50* and then bent the sw from 55* to 53*, which takes out 2* of bounce. In this configuration, I was able to match the 2.0's distance while maintaining consistent distances and gaps. The sw also is my favorite club from 90 yards in. It's surprisingly nimble.
Mishits with the r9 are harsher than the others and stock grips are trash. I will definitely regrip and might even try some pro soft inserts to cushion the blow.
Last edited: