We've launched the new forums! Read more here

Cleveland CG16 Irons - PHOTOS!!!

SuperStroke
Hello everyone, this is my first post. When will JB release his CG16 iron review? I tend to agree with TC that I'm struggling to tell "BUTTERY FEEL" of a forged club vs cast club. Perhaps I'm lacking on experiences. I've played Mizuno forged, and currently plays A4 forged, and was playing Burner Plus.
 
EarlyTeetime said:
Hello everyone, this is my first post. When will JB release his CG16 iron review? I tend to agree with TC that I'm struggling to tell "BUTTERY FEEL" of a forged club vs cast club. Perhaps I'm lacking on experiences. I've played Mizuno forged, and currently plays A4 forged, and was playing Burner Plus.
Click to expand...

Our review will be released on these as we get closer to 2011. The clubs do not come out for several months and we dont want to have a review out too early. Tons of info in this thread though. 50 people got to try these out at the THP Demo Day.
 
JB said:
Our review will be released on these as we get closer to 2011. The clubs do not come out for several months and we dont want to have a review out too early. Tons of info in this thread though. 50 people got to try these out at the THP Demo Day.
Click to expand...

Can't wait. I've spent countless hours reading THP demo day reviews, Burner 2.0, and Mashie Hybrid reviews!
 
Heard from a little birdie that these were released on 1st December in the UK & US. Nothing on the Cleveland site though. I NEED to see the Full Review! :clap:
 
They look good but Cleveland haven't really caught my eye since the TA-series from 6-7 years back. I played the TA-3s for many years and those sticks were really sweet.
 
SidBurns said:
Heard from a little birdie that these were released on 1st December in the UK & US. Nothing on the Cleveland site though. I NEED to see the Full Review! :clap:
Click to expand...

Your little birdie lied to you. :act-up:
 
JB said:
Your little birdie lied to you. :act-up:
Click to expand...

Sounds like it! The website GolfAlot also states the 1st December though, weird...

You would've thought Cleveland may have brought the clubs out prior to Christmas unless they've got something else up their sleeves!?!
 
SidBurns said:
Sounds like it! The website GolfAlot also states the 1st December though, weird...

You would've thought Cleveland may have brought the clubs out prior to Christmas unless they've got something else up their sleeves!?!
Click to expand...

They use the same release almost every year.
 
They're probably still busy trying to pump out as many CG15 wedges as they can before then end of the year cut-off.

JB said:
They use the same release almost every year.
Click to expand...

The CG7BP's were available around this time last year. I guess they weren't any new design but just a face-lift from the original CG7.
 
Looks neat even though i think the design is a step backwards from the G15.
 
I didn't think Cleveland made g15 irons?
 
flix said:
Looks neat even though i think the design is a step backwards from the G15.
Click to expand...

Im guessing that you are thinking of the wedges as opposed to the irons. We do have a thread for them as well. The 16 wedge is actually a replacement for the CG14's.

This message was Tapatalked
 
EarlyTeetime said:
Haha.... I complete agrees. It is on my must "have/demo" list in 2011 along with Mashie.
Click to expand...

Thats a good idea, these are very sweet irons. These were one of my favorites from the THP demo day.
 
OEM Kevin said:
Thats a good idea, these are very sweet irons. These were one of my favorites from the THP demo day.
Click to expand...

+1


I don't always post remotely but when I do, I use Tapatalk.
 
CG16 specs vs Burner 2.0 specs

CG16 specs vs Burner 2.0 specs

Iron Loft Lie Offset Steel Length
Cleveland CG 16 Specs
3 19 60.00 6.1mm 39 ¾
4 21 60.75 5.3mm 39 1/8
5 24 61.5 4.6mm 38 ½
6 27 62.25 4.1mm 37 7/8
7 31 63.08 3.6mm 37 ¼
8 35 63.5 3.1mm 36 ¾
9 39 64 2.7mm 36 ¼
PW 44 64.5 2.3mm 35 ¾

Taylor Made Burner 2.0 Specs
4 21 61.5 6.1mm 38 7/8
5 24 62 5.1mm 38 ¼
6 27 62.5 4.8mm 37 5/8
7 31 63 4.2mm 37
8 35 63.5 3.4mm 36 ½
9 40 64 2.7mm 36
PW 45 64.5 2.0mm 35 ½
AW 50 64.5 1.5mm 35 ½



CG16 has less offset than Burner 2.0, some of you at THP demo day have said they are more forgiving than Burner 2.0. Any thoughts on this? Additionally, CG 16 irons are bit longer in terms steel length than Burner 2.0. Both of them have stock 85g steel shafts.

*Please note CG 16 offset specs are rounded to the tenth decimal*
 
good looking iron, but i don't like that they kinda ripped off the ap2 look
 
provx said:
good looking iron, but i don't like that they kinda ripped off the ap2 look
Click to expand...

I dont think they ripped off the AP2 look. yeah, there are similarities but I think this looks better
 
One-T said:
I dont think they ripped off the AP2 look. yeah, there are similarities but I think this looks better
Click to expand...

One-T, How does CG 16 compare to your CG 7?
 
EarlyTeetime said:
Iron Loft Lie Offset Steel Length
Cleveland CG 16 Specs
3 19 60.00 6.1mm 39 ¾
4 21 60.75 5.3mm 39 1/8
5 24 61.5 4.6mm 38 ½
6 27 62.25 4.1mm 37 7/8
7 31 63.08 3.6mm 37 ¼
8 35 63.5 3.1mm 36 ¾
9 39 64 2.7mm 36 ¼
PW 44 64.5 2.3mm 35 ¾

Taylor Made Burner 2.0 Specs
4 21 61.5 6.1mm 38 7/8
5 24 62 5.1mm 38 ¼
6 27 62.5 4.8mm 37 5/8
7 31 63 4.2mm 37
8 35 63.5 3.4mm 36 ½
9 40 64 2.7mm 36
PW 45 64.5 2.0mm 35 ½
AW 50 64.5 1.5mm 35 ½



CG16 has less offset than Burner 2.0, some of you at THP demo day have said they are more forgiving than Burner 2.0. Any thoughts on this? Additionally, CG 16 irons are bit longer in terms steel length than Burner 2.0. Both of them have stock 85g steel shafts.

*Please note CG 16 offset specs are rounded to the tenth decimal*
Click to expand...

i am under the impression that added offset is there to assist in acquiring a higher ball flight, not so much for forgiveness.
 
EarlyTeetime said:
One-T, How does CG 16 compare to your CG 7?
Click to expand...


I want to start by saying that I really like my CG7's, I love how they feel when hitting a pure shot and also how they grab the ball. The 16's have the laser milled face so they will produce the same spin. I will say that I found the 16's to be a little more forgiving, anything hit out on the toe was still gaining some distance. A mis hit doesnt feel as harsh with the 16's. I would also say that I felt like the more Pure shot felt just a bit more Pure with the 16. Now, I havent had a whole lot of time with the 16 and the wind was horrible that day, so it was hard for me to get true results. But, all in all, if I were to go out to buy new irons and I had these two sitting side by side I would take the 16's. I love the look, I think they are some of the best looking irons out there and they feel awesome. I hope this helps, let me know if you have any other questions
 
One-T said:
I want to start by saying that I really like my CG7's, I love how they feel when hitting a pure shot and also how they grab the ball. The 16's have the laser milled face so they will produce the same spin. I will say that I found the 16's to be a little more forgiving, anything hit out on the toe was still gaining some distance. A mis hit doesnt feel as harsh with the 16's. I would also say that I felt like the more Pure shot felt just a bit more Pure with the 16. Now, I havent had a whole lot of time with the 16 and the wind was horrible that day, so it was hard for me to get true results. But, all in all, if I were to go out to buy new irons and I had these two sitting side by side I would take the 16's. I love the look, I think they are some of the best looking irons out there and they feel awesome. I hope this helps, let me know if you have any other questions
Click to expand...

Thank you One-T! Good stuff... more pure and more forgiving... Wow
 
TC said:
i am under the impression that added offset is there to assist in acquiring a higher ball flight, not so much for forgiveness.
Click to expand...

Good point TC. Have you try the CG 16 yet or are you still on the TM Burner 2.0 lovefest.
 
EarlyTeetime said:
Good point TC. Have you try the CG 16 yet or are you still on the TM Burner 2.0 lovefest.
Click to expand...

i have not tried them, they weren't available in LH at the outing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top