Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I've hit both and I love the SF2.0. The R11 looks much better than the SF2.0 at setup, but the SF is like someone said a "cannon" off the deck or tee. You can probably work the R11 a little more, but I don't like the feel as well as the SF. Also.. I like the idea of using it off the tee if the driver is failing me on any given day.
But if you're only using it off the tee...that's waisting 1 of your 14 clubs. I can comment on this referring to the original superfast. The SF was longer off the tee (2* difference in loft) but not by much. I hit the r11 sweet spot better and have WAY better success with the r11 off the ground. The r11 is also significantly easier to control and is much more accurate. It looks nicer and has the added adjustability that the SF line lacks. In my opinion, the r11 FW is a better buy all around.
Tap before talk.
I didn't say only off the tee. I simply like the fact that this club is so long off the tee as well. I haven't hit the R11 much, but I am the opposite of you. I for one hit the ball so much better off the turf and tee with the SF than the R11. I just fire away when on the tee and off the deck, I choke down a little bit for added control. I think it may be all mental with the R11 though. Maybe I will try the 4 wood instead of the 3.
Either way.... Yahtzee, I suggest you hit both because each of these two clubs offers different things for different players. Then make your decision on which is best for you.
quick question.
Would the r11 4w adjusted 1* higher loft to 18* play virtually the same as the r11 5w adjusted 1* strong to 18*?