Super Tuna
You can't scale this!
Sebring should be dying it's death soonish I imagine. The 200 is the replacement to it and by the reviews of it so far, it's substantially improved at a better price point
The New Charger
Sebring should be dying it's death soonish I imagine. The 200 is the replacement to it and by the reviews of it so far, it's substantially improved at a better price point
tomahawk18
Waiting for some sun!?
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2011
- Messages
- 3,100
- Reaction score
- 16
- Location
- Bothell, Washington, United States
- Handicap
- GHIN 6.6
I have an '05 Dodge Magnum (station wagon) 5.7 litre 355hp HEMI with a K and N short ram that has a nice throaghty rumble to it when I manually shift through the gears with the stability control "off" of course. 0-60 in around 5.5 seconds. Not bad for a wagon. 
Bridges
New member
I guess im in the minority here. I dont think it looks good at all, maybe with some different wheels on it though. The newer Camaro's puts this thing to shame, IMO.
edit: beaten by jr.
edit: beaten by jr.
RatFink
Carnivore
THe normal R/T is better looking than the SRT pictured there.
I know you are part of a large group of the population since the Camaro is outselling the Mustang and Challenger, but the Camaro is just terrible IMO. Bad on the outside, and god-awful on the inside.
Osahar
Working on the swing
The 200 is basically a warmed over Sebring. Change up the sheet metal, improved the interior a bit. Substantial improvement? I'll let the review by Scott Burgess from the Detroit News speak for me:
Osahar
Working on the swing
I'd argue that, but everyone likes different design looks. Personally, until Chrysler Group can prove that they can build a lineup that will get them out of the bottom 1/4 of all manufacturers for quality in the JD Power studies (both new & 3-year old) I wouldn't touch them.
They are sharp-looking cars. Not sure how well they will sell with gas being $4 a gallon though. Small cars, hybrids and midsize cars with 4-cylinder engines are going to be in high demand again.
Amen to that. Their reputation for poor quality and poor fuel economy is hurting them.
Super Tuna
You can't scale this!
Righty then...
Some of the local guys were far more approving of it, apparently in error. Plus side: It still has a nice looking commercial!
Osahar
Working on the swing
Righty then...
Some of the local guys were far more approving of it, apparently in error. Plus side: It still has a nice looking commercial!
Completely agree, that is a great commercial. I'm just thankful I'm not working in Detroit and (hopefully) won't see a position there anytime soon.
Bridges
New member
Really, ehh??
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
I think the Challengers look way better than the chargers.
RatFink
Carnivore
We've had an '08 Charger and we haven't had a single problem with it - I argue that they are on the up and out and with the new wave of cars, they will break out very nicely.
The trucks have been doing well as well since the '09 1500 Ram was released.
Really, ehh??
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
I think the Challengers look way better than the chargers.
Camaros just don't float my boat I'm afraid - especially when people get them with the optional body kit.. they just look SO chunky and heavy and glued on.
All Domestic cars have had a terrible interior for the last 15+ years, but they're all turning around. The new Charger is way nicer than the previous one, and honestly kicks Toyota (the "benchmark") right up their pooper for design and aesthetics. Same goes for all new released mopars.
For Domestic interiors, I'd go Mopar, Ford, Chev... and even then I'd take a Chev's interior over any toyota's.