pjcedog
New member
There are so many factors, so many variables, that come into play on the golf course that to really compare one to another you probably have to play both for at least 4 or 5 rounds under conditions that are as close to consistent as possible to really know which of several clubs, or in this case a technology, is going to be better for your game unless one of them is just not hittable at all or really just doesn't work for you for any reason. I think Hawk is going about this in the right way, real world testing is the only way to determine whether there is any real benefit from the shaft insert.