crazygolfnut
Let's have fun out there!
I was not overly impressed with the Q Star when I first tried it. After reading some of the comments here, I will have to give them another try. :confused2:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It is my understanding that the Q ball is pretty much a rebranding of the lousy marketed AD333 - which is a very good ball.
Glad you got to try it out hawk. It is a dang fine ball in every regard. Easily the quickest learned ball I've ever played in terms of knowing how it will react greenside.
Budget price, premium performance.
--
tapatalk
I have some thoughts for the folks playing Srixon balls in the MC - as well as anybody else that would like to chime in.
I've done the Srixon ball fitting and it has basically told me over and over again that it recommends the Q-Star. My results with it with the driver were better than the Z-Star in both feel and distance. Now - I will say that some of that was probably coincidence in that I just happened to put better swings on the ball with the Q-Star, still.
All the smart people say playing a ball like this can be beneficial to somebody of my skill level, but I continue to have the same argument in my head that I need the urethane cover. It annoys me that I second guess myself and fitting tools.
Anybody else thinking of giving these a fair shot come ball selection time rather than the Z-Star or XV?
I have been on the monitor and will likely wait until I get outside for awhile this spring before I make any decisions. I just can never wrap my head around why I am so drawn to Tour balls when the company itself is saying - Save your money. We have a ball that might be better for you.
I have some thoughts for the folks playing Srixon balls in the MC - as well as anybody else that would like to chime in.
I've done the Srixon ball fitting and it has basically told me over and over again that it recommends the Q-Star. My results with it with the driver were better than the Z-Star in both feel and distance. Now - I will say that some of that was probably coincidence in that I just happened to put better swings on the ball with the Q-Star, still.
All the smart people say playing a ball like this can be beneficial to somebody of my skill level, but I continue to have the same argument in my head that I need the urethane cover. It annoys me that I second guess myself and fitting tools.
Anybody else thinking of giving these a fair shot come ball selection time rather than the Z-Star or XV?
I have been on the monitor and will likely wait until I get outside for awhile this spring before I make any decisions. I just can never wrap my head around why I am so drawn to Tour balls when the company itself is saying - Save your money. We have a ball that might be better for you.
Not that it's the case for you but it sounds like a little bit of the programming all golfers have with 'play what the pros play'
^^^^^^ I Tapped That.....On My iPad ^^^^^^
You know, I had heard the Q-Star is very similar to the e6, and I am going to go with the Q-Star which is what the fitting told me as well. I have played the Q-Star, and as far as the way they react on and around the greens, again, very similar to he e6 IMO. I do not know what shot shape you are used to, so that makes it hard for me to say, but I hit high hop and stops on my full shots and have never had a problem. Hope this helps.
because you are an internet golfer hehe
You aren't alone with that. Look how many people play a tour ball that could benefit from something else.
I don't think this ball is anything like the Z-Star, Dam. It seems much closer to an e6 type ball imo.
I don't think this ball is anything like the Z-Star, Dam. It seems much closer to an e6 type ball imo.
Oh I know, I just figured I may try it because it's a cheaper option and seems like it performs well. I want to get it around greens to see how the spin is especially. I like a lot of spin.
This is a surlyn like cover, so I wouldn't think it would fit that requirement at all. I've heard some folks say that it has decent spin, but I would expect it to react similarly to any other ball in its class.