It wasn’t so long ago that had you said one of the most anticipated Callaway releases of the new year would be golf balls, you’d have gotten some very interesting reactions. However, in 2022, that is precisely the situation.
Since the inception of Chrome Soft, Callaway has been on a meteoric rise in the golf ball segment the likes of which we have never seen in terms of grabbing market share. While one might think that 2021’s craziness could potentially slow that momentum, it did the exact opposite. With two Major Championships and an Olympic Gold Medal, Chrome Soft was the hottest golf ball on the planet.
While other companies may decide to just “run with it” for another cycle, Callaway has been priming up for this release, they have said, the next evolution is all about “Precision Technology”.
2022 Callaway Chrome Soft Family
Callaway refers to themselves as an “unrivaled tech enabled golf company”, and with the advent of A.I. and a plethora of other technology firsts in the industry, no one can argue that point. When it comes to golf balls, the investment has been well beyond substantial to live up to that moniker. By spending over 50 million dollars, they have revolutionized their manufacturing facilities and the 2022 version of Chrome Soft is utilizing their newest tech, 3D X-Ray.
While altering and evolving the core, cover, and aerodynamic properties of the entire lineup is definitely a part of the story, the bigger tale to be told is what Callaway calls “Concentricity Offset”. In the simplest terms, yes, this is about ensuring things are centered, but not just the core, rather the 3D X-Ray and its high-definition imagery means Callaway can now check every single layer of their golf balls to ensure manufacturing specs are hit to within 1/1000th of an inch.
This is important because internal testing showed Callaway that the same ball, if offset, can have a multitude of different reactions off the face depending on its orientation, we are talking 2.7 MPH, 2.1° launch, and 1200 RPM of spin differences. Now, obviously, on the course we can’t look at the ball and align it every single shot because we can’t see the inside, so Callaway has taken their evolution to a level no other golf ball manufacturer has with 3D X-Ray and are trying to eliminate all the variables…except for our crazy swings.
This is why you will notice Callaway pushing “Precision Technology” everywhere this year, it may not fix our swings, but it will increase the potential for consistency.
2022 Callaway Chrome Soft
Now don’t worry Callaway fans, first thing is first, the company is adamant that soft feel, which put this golf ball on the map, is still well intact, but now with more ball speed and thus more distance potential.
The CS remains a 3-piece design which now uses a new “Hyper Elastic SoftFast Core”. While alarm bells would normally go off when a company changes the core, this new technology used Cross Linking which basically means the core responds better to strain (impact) at higher speeds allowing it to generate more energy, but without altering feel or touch.
The new Chrome Soft also features a new aerodynamic dimple pattern to help with longer carry and lower drag. Testing from the company points to about 0.5 MPH increase in speed off the driver while dropping spin in that club as well as the 7i.
2022 Callaway Chrome Soft X
The most played Callaway ball on Tour, they admit that their players were on them to not change a thing, after all, we all know by now this ball is the reason Jon Rahm came to Callaway. Not to mention, the CSX might have been the fastest golf ball on the market, so why would you change anything? Because better is always better.
The 2022 Chrome Soft X is still a 4-piece design, and according to the company, it is even faster than it was thanks to the same Cross Linking technology which was used in the CS being present here in the new Hyper Elastic SoftFast Core. Add new aerodynamics to play stronger into the wind, and the testing has indicated there to be no spin change while adding about 0.7 MPH ball speed off the tee.
The longest might have just gotten longer. However, it is important to note that at lower speeds, this Cross Linking in the core means that it performs just like its predecessor, meaning no loss of greenside feel, precision, or spin.
2022 Callaway Chrome Soft X LS
While it’s a mouthful to say, the CSX LS has been an eye opener for a segment of golfers who just generate more spin than is necessarily optimal for their games, and while they’re obviously a smaller segment than the other two balls address, this design is what gives Callaway one of the most complete Tour Caliber golf ball lineups on the market.
The LS also uses the new Hyper Elastic SoftFast Core along with Tour influences for the aerodynamic pattern in its 4-Piece design like its siblings in the lineup do. The big difference here is an all-new cover material which Callaway developed specifically to address the one knock on the original version by some, greenside control.
This new softer cover in cooperation with the new core has increased the ball speed, but also managed to increase spin around the greens while lowering it elsewhere. Testing shows almost 1 MPH of added ball speed while dropping off over 100 RPM’s from the driver and 7i.
The Details on the full lineup
Availability: 1/28/22
Price: $49.99
Options: Standard, Triple Track, Truvis
View attachment 9057148
and always a big thing in terms of feel. (Not going to hide the fact that a couple Callaway covers haven’t been recent favorites of mine) And to me the cover change on this one is either just big on its own, or in combination with the new core that’s not supposed to feel any different, it feels pretty different to me. And I like it much better.
And results have been good. It’s cold here now obviously, but it has impressed me regardless, and more so on a couple 70 degree days. Indoor as well. Excited for more people to get their hands on them and see what they think.
Not sure who of the GD boys played the prior one, but I know a couple of them with speed fight spin a bit so I’ll be interested in their experience.
Can’t wait to hear GD crew feedback.
That’s super interesting stuff. I’ve hit the 2022 LS w/triple track and I really liked it, and I suck. I’m still not sure if I’m the guy that will be buying $50 a dozen golf balls yet, I wish I could because I love the triple track and the ball more than anything I’ve played, but I just lose too many still.
I did really like the ball at the dream foursome though, and I either missed the convo at the Dream Foursome or we didn’t get quite this nugget dropped. This x-ray process sounds super interesting, and it makes COMPLETE sense since I believe Callaway has faced some scrutiny in the past over their QC. This seems like a way to make a massive comeback from that, I love that they grabbed that bull by the horns and just put it to rest. This is is amazing, and if I get to the point where I can handle $50 a dozen, this will be the ball I play. Period.
Would you say it’s a softer feel? Reason I ask, is I liked the less spin, but to me, it was a tad on the firm side and part of the reason I moved back to the regular CSX.
The slides really helped hit home the points and to see @JasonFinleyCG passion behinds these is evident in how he talked about them that he has no doubt these are the best lineup out their and nobody is doing what Callaway does in regards to ball manufacturers now.
Yes, absolutely. Feels and sounds different off of everything. Like I said, it was immediately noticable to me and I’ve enjoyed the change.
Yea and he did make that very apparent to us as well. He believes in the product 100% and stands behind it being the best ball in existence which is huge.
Interesting. I will have to snag me a sleeve of these as well to give a try.
Crazier is they did it with NO spin change in what was already the fastest ball on the market
Driver
Off the tee, both of these balls are very hot. They are both on the higher compression side, but they don’t feel like rocks off the driver. They pair very nicely with the new line of drivers. The launch and spin differences between the two models was not significant for me, which is a good thing! They both come off with a relatively high launch and low spin with the LS being slightly higher launch and about 100rpm lower spin. Not sure if this is based on strike variance, but I like that they have such a similar profile off the driver.
Irons
This is where the performance characteristics really separate between the X and the LS. They are both very fast off the club like they were with the driver, and the launch was pretty similar (LS maybe a touch lower than X). The spin difference was noticeable however. The LS was consistently 300-400 rpm lower than the X, which is great for someone like me who struggles with excess iron spin. The major improvement from the original LS is how much softer the cover feels off the irons. I actually got the chance to play the LS and the X during the singles round at the Dye. Through 8 holes, I noticed that the greens were more firm than they were on the Clive and approaches were running out more than the day prior. I switched to the X for the back 9, and it was a seamless change. They feel so similar now that I can envision myself using both balls depending on where I’m playing and what the conditions are like. If I’m playing in very dry conditions or at altitude, I can definitely see myself using the regular X where extra spin is helpful to hold greens. On an every day basis in Ohio, the CSX LS will be the ball I go to because it’s typically soft enough where I don’t need that spin boost.
Wedges
If you didn’t tell me which ball you had in front of me from 50 yards, I wouldn’t have been able to tell the difference. This is also the biggest improvement for the CSX LS. There was some inconsistency with some wedge shots that seemed to come off without any spin if it wasn’t nipped just right on the partial shots. There was a few shots last season that stood out to me where I thought I hit a good pitch, and it just didn’t stop. That doesn’t seem to be a problem anymore with the new cover. The feedback is phenomenal, and also so much softer than the original. When you hit it perfect, it feels great. When you miss it by a groove, it feels much better than the original and more importantly, you don’t get the spin drop offs that run out 10 feet past where you thought they’d stop.
Putter
Off the putter, the new cover of the LS feels significantly better as well similarly to the wedges. The cover improvements are fantastic, and the Triple Track is the best alignment aid in golf.
Durability
This is the one concern I still have with the CSX LS. There was one ball in California that was noticeable scuffed up after a bunker shot that I hit well and was unusable after that. I didn’t notice any damage outside of the expected from normal play, but this is something I will be paying attention to this season.
Overall Thoughts
These golf balls are phenomenal! The quality control in the production is unmatched, and after talking in depth with Finley. I know all 3 golf balls in every sleeves of Chrome Soft will be exactly the same. They feel great off of every club, and they are very consistent. The X and LS perform exactly as advertised. If you liked the original LS, you’re going to love the upgrades. The LS will be my ball of choice for the foreseeable future.
? reading this @cm24 I’m
Great review! You were definitely one of the guys I wanted to hear feedback on about it. The LS change was such a pleasant surprise when I first hit it. And feels great off those new irons of yours!! Good stuff.
EXCELLENT write up!
I like that Callaway is turning their biggest weakness into their biggest strength (quality control) in the ball category.
Thank you for writing this, a great compliment to the other review, provides additional first hand usage and thoughts.
But when I read the article, and the focus on "concentricity offset", I knew where it was going, but it still surprised me. Because for them to say repeatedly that their off-center cores didn’t significantly affect flight or performance during that past thing, but now say (admit?) that it can cause variations of up to "2.7 MPH, 2.1° launch, and 1200 RPM of spin differences" and is now quality controlled to within 1/1000th of an inch to insure against that, I couldn’t help but wonder if some important date for legal action against them had passed or something. Like a we don’t give a f**k anymore date. Maybe even just on pubic/customer opinion. Because that’s a pretty massive reversal, and effectively, admission.
All for going above and beyond to get it sorted out. Love quantity control. Enjoying the LS improvements. That actual statement, instead of just claiming to have the ‘most centered ball’, or exact to within that 1/1000th" or whatever, made my eyes wide in reading though.
Graphene hasn’t been used in the lineup in full for a cycle now. Able to surpass it.
Also, another very informative write up @Jman. You’ve had a busy holiday season!!
You don’t point out your problems until you fix them. Then you act like you’re the only one that does things this high quality. That’s the corporate marketing way ?
They were already in process of fixing it all before that shock article went up, fwiw.
To be fair, no one else is using 3D X-ray, X-ray yes, not this newest setup where they can look at every single layer.
To be fair, that isn’t what took place. As a company they said there were issues previously, made a huge investment starting 3-4 years ago. And they are the only ones doing this.
I think publicly they kind of acted like they were unfairly targeted, but obviously spending $50 million to do better says they knew they had an issue. I agree this sounds like the next level in QC which is great, but they definitely had a QC issue.
Enter the 2022 Chrome Soft X LS…. They took all of the best aspects of the previous ball and softened the outer layer. Of course, there are other improvements as noted in the THP article, but the noticeable difference for me was in feel and I LOOOOOOOVE it. Off the putter, wedges, driver and woods, it is money. While at The Hideaway on Singles Day, I noticed that the guys playing the LS struggled less in the wind that we were facing later in the day. It cuts through and holds its line like a champ. I haven’t had much SIM time since we have limited access here and our local Edwin Watts GC2 was down for weeks after I returned, but suffice to say as soon as I can get some ball data I will. They should also have a GC Quad shortly and that will help a ton.
In the interim, I will just say the Chrome Soft X LS is the best Callaway ball to date and getting a chance to see how it is literally saving strokes on tour was a huge boost of confidence when putting it in play. We’re not tour players, but everyone one of us has a great round when we get the best out of our ball and in this case, the "best" just got better.
I really believe the CSX was the best ball I put in play last year for me and they will be gamed again this year. I never tried the LS as I don’t think I really need it but the fact that listened and improved is impressive.
I guess I viewed it differently as they definitely talked about issues in the past. Even saying so on THP’s podcast and in our interviews. The issue they took was timing, as in when a hit piece comes out, and takes credit for change, the change had already taken place and had no bearing on the investment. But its the internet and when an axe exists, one will grind it.
Feel for me in huge, especially on or around the green. Love hearing this!
They definitely had a QC issue (which they admitted), but interestingly enough, they weren’t the only ones. A certain site positioned it that way, but social media showed users splitting their balls during the height of the #ballgate craze and found the same issues with almost every manufacturer, including the "big boys". The investment means they knew there were issues and have done more than any to fix them.
I play the Chrome Soft X LS, and this data very much intrigues me: This new softer cover in cooperation with the new core has increased the ball speed, but also managed to increase spin around the greens while lowering it elsewhere. Testing shows almost 1 MPH of added ball speed while dropping off over 100 RPM’s from the driver and 7i.
I look forward to seeing if I can appreciate the difference from last years ball, once I go through my stash of 2021s
Literally all of us noticed it. That’s what I loved most. Many times, you can hear claims of what equipment is marketed to do, but seeing the results of being able to perceive that the difference in feel on every shot was awesome. I can’t wait to order more of these!
I am a bit taken back on how they did this as well. The chrome soft X was my favorite ball last year, so I am quite interested in seeing the improvement.
I would need to find somewhere with a monitor to get numbers as my previous instructor uses Trackman and I could only do testing indoors if I don’t want to throw away a load of balls, but with the lack of space in the bays I never feel 100% comfortable swinging clubs (even though it is enough) and spin is estimated most of the time from what I remember whenever I have hit balls
The LS ball was my ball of choice for 2021. Coming from the Bridgestone Tour B RX, I knew I wanted Triple Track, but never really got along with the Chrome Soft or Chrome Soft X from 2020. So when the CSX LS came out last year, I gave them a try and was immediately hooked. I loved that ball, but did have some areas for improvement.
So the conversation with some other Grandaddy guys went like this: I wish the cover was a bit softer, it does tend to feel a bit clicky, especially off of the putter. And there are some durability concerns, (i personally have sliced/gouged up quite a few in the last year). And I really wish it would have a bit more spin on the greens. I need it to bite more.
Imagine our surprise when @JasonFinleyCG is standing on the stage presenting to us, and immediately rattles off:
HOLY WHAT. We all looked at each other like, was he spying on us earlier?!?!?
I have played now 54 holes, with 4 CSX LS balls. And the only reason it is 4 balls instead of 1, is that I lost 2 in water, and 1 in a back yard. (1 at the Hideaway on Thursday, 2 when I played in Cincinnati a couple weeks ago). I played with the same ball the entire first day at the Hideaway, and it looked great after, even with a fresh set of wedges.
I plan to stockpile on the 2022 CSX LS!
Copied from your article and wondering why they wanted dropped spin in the 7 iron?