Since its inception, the Q-STAR golf ball has been a boon for Srixon Golf. A golf ball for the masses, which focuses on the things that most golfers need, and at a price point that makes them as happy as the performance.

It is because of that, when new release season rolls around, it is always fun to see what tweaks Srixon decides to make, and this year with the sixth generation of the Q-STAR, I think “tweak” is a great way to describe it.
The New 2022 Srixon Q-STAR
As mentioned, this marks the sixth Q-STAR design for Srixon and at the $27.99 price point, it is a popular golf ball, which doesn’t look to change anytime soon. The reason for the success? Yes, the aforementioned price is part of it, but bigger is the fact that it is an all-around performer for the masses.

The Q-STAR remains a two-piece design with an ionomer cover. One aspect where Srixon has made strides with all their golf balls, and the ionomer Q is no exception, is the application of “Spin Skin” with SeRM. While the name is definitely unique, what the coating does on the golf balls is perhaps even more so by allowing the contact to dig deeper into the grooves of wedges with the goal of increasing spin potential into and around greens.

It should be no surprise to hear that Srixon went into this release looking to offer better distance off the tee and more feel as proximity gets closer to the green, after all, that is at the top of the list for pretty much every golfer on the planet. In order to accomplish those goals, Srixon has lowered the overall compression from the previous iterations. The changes to the FastLayer Core look to make distance and control from tee to green more sustainable for moderate swingers. Add in Srixon’s 338 dimple design and the Q-STAR is poised to remain a major player in its price segment.
Initial Impressions
I have actually been able to have the Q-STAR in hand for a bit now, and put them into play. While I’m not going to get too down and dirty with the feedback just yet, that will definitely be coming very soon so stay tuned. But I did want to touch on the overall feedback I have seen.
First, I hit the new version next to the previous and in the mild winter weather we are seeing right now in Oklahoma I could tell the difference in compression, which in my mind is a good thing. Now, I’m more prone to notice these differences than most, so your mileage may vary, but in some blind mixed-up testing of both versions I was able to pick out the new Q in long irons and with wedges.
While I’m a stronger swinger than what this is aimed at, the Q-STAR did quite well for me in the crazy wind we have been seeing and spin differences from urethane golf balls were quite close from long range, but the difference is there getting closer to the green. I also tried to really beat up the golf balls as I have had some past issues with SpinSkin, but so far so good here. Initial thoughts are definitely positive. Keep an eye peeled for a deeper dive in the future!
The Details
Price: $27.99
Colors: Pure White and Tour Yellow
Availability: 12/15/2021




The Q-Star Tour has been my favorite ball for the last couple of years. Nice write up.
[USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] The Q Stars are a great golf ball for their price point. Great write up!
Thanks, Jman. Nice write up. What’s the compression on these? What does the yellow color look like? Taxi cab yellow like the Soft Feel?
[QUOTE=”Carolina Golfer, post: 10304324, member: 44136″]
Thanks, Jman. Nice write up. What’s the compression on these? What does the yellow color look like? Taxi cab yellow like the Soft Feel?
[/QUOTE]
They didn’t disclose that rating in the materials I had. But, hitting the last two models side by side, I could tell a difference.
The yellow on the Q’s is the same as that on the Z’s (y)
[QUOTE=”Danimal, post: 10304263, member: 46311″]
The Q-Star Tour has been my favorite ball for the last couple of years. Nice write up.
[/QUOTE]
You probably are aware of this, but the Q-Star and Q-Star Tour are completely different animals (different ball design). Just wanted to point that out if it wasn’t obvious…
BTW, I also have had a great deal of success gaming the Q-Star Tour (both regular and Divide models) so I can see why it is a favorite for you.
I have used the Q-Star Tour and found it very nice ball at a good price. I use Pro V1s and the Q-Star Tours the most now.
[QUOTE=”Luchnia, post: 10304382, member: 56326″]
I have used the Q-Star Tour and found it very nice ball at a good price. I use Pro V1s and the Q-Star Tours the most now.
[/QUOTE]
QST is a great ball, the QS is as well though. 😉
I’ve always like the Q-Star, I tend to lean more towards it’s Tour brother, but I have happily played it in the past. Definitely one of the better 2 piece balls out there. It’s a crowded market, for sure, and the QS has always been a standout (for me, anyways). Interesting (and good) that performance was noticeably different from the older version, I think a lot of times we get the “latest and greatest” but aren’t sure if there’s truly any real difference.
I usually play the Soft Feel but considering giving QStar a try!
I enjoyed reading the write up about the 2022 Q Star.
I’m going to have to give these a try.
This is a popular ball for a good reason. As far as two piece plastic covered balls go it performs well at a solid price.
Nice preview [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]. The Q Star is a solid performer in its price range.
Not sure why but this ball and the Z-Star just look bada__ to me on a peg. It is a great ball.
I might have to give these a try. I’ve been playing the Q-Star Tour, but course conditions should be a bit softer for awhile and the QS might be a good middle ground between the QST and the Soft Feels. I always like the QS in the past, so I’m sure I could play this one without issue.
I always liked the Q-STAR golf ball. Feels good, offers good performance off the tee and low spin.
I have never tried the regular Q-Star, just always played the QST.
Price range makes it a great winter time option. I’ll give them a try next time I buy balls.
What differentiates this ball from the Soft Feel? The one thing that jumps out is the Spinskin with SeRM on the Q-Stars. Anything else? Compression?
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 10305297, member: 3″]
I always liked the Q-STAR golf ball. Feels good, offers good performance off the tee and low spin.
[/QUOTE]
Agreed. Also, I’ll always have a soft spot for the Q-Star. I was chosen to review that ball here on THP not long after joining the forum. It was a solid performer then and has continued to be through it’s many iterations.
Nice write up on a really good ball. I could hack them around. Waiting on some divide balls to arrive. Might grab a dozen of the new Q Star just to compare to other options in the bag.
[QUOTE=”Duffer Waldorf, post: 10305851, member: 43357″]
What differentiates this ball from the Soft Feel? The one thing that jumps out is the Spinskin with SeRM on the Q-Stars. Anything else? Compression?
[/QUOTE]
On the course I’m guessing you’d be hard pressed to tell any discernible difference with the Soft Feel.
At $27 for a 2 pc surlyn — hard pass. Just too many 3 pc urethane balls out there in that range with prior Gen deals, sales, DTC bulk, etc.
In my opinion their Soft Feel ball is a good choice if you want a decent 2 pc surlyn on the cheap. Just can’t see the $7 premium there on top of the Soft Feel.
Glad to see this line continue.
So many options…..Don’t foresee a Srixon encounter personally.
Nice to see an update on the line I was a long time player of W star until others came along. Awesome straight distance
[QUOTE=”erock9174, post: 10306074, member: 7797″]
At $27 for a 2 pc surlyn — hard pass. Just too many 3 pc urethane balls out there in that range with prior Gen deals, sales, DTC bulk, etc.
In my opinion their Soft Feel ball is a good choice if you want a decent 2 pc surlyn on the cheap. Just can’t see the $7 premium there on top of the Soft Feel.
[/QUOTE]
Maybe, but is today’s 2 piece as good as another 3 piece surlyn and if the spin skin is real?
I’d rock the QST divide balls, I think there pretty neat. I actually bought all the girls on my daughters team a sleeve last year for putting practice. I played them a few times and it was pretty good ball.
[QUOTE=”Carolina Golfer, post: 10306588, member: 44136″]
Maybe, but is today’s 2 piece as good as another 3 piece surylyn and if the spin skin is real?
[/QUOTE]
I’m not talking 3 pc surlyn. I’m talking the availability of lower priced 3pc urethane balls.