What do you look for in a golf ball? Is it distance? Soft feel? Accuracy? Maybe a urethane cover?
Undoubtedly, you are sitting there nodding your head “YES!”, just like the hopeless golfing addicts which we all are, so, what if I told you that Callaway has a ball which checks all those boxes?
What if I told you it is only $39.99? Do I still have your attention?
Well, what if I told you that ball was the ERC Soft?

2023 Callaway ERC Soft
Now, before you accuse me of trying to pull one over on you, sit back and see why the newest iteration of the ERC Soft does, in fact, check all those aforementioned performance traits off of the list. You see, while on the internet, we golfers tend to believe to have a golf ball that offers all of those things then you absolutely must use a “Tour” style golf ball, but there is much more to it than that.

When ERC Soft came onto the scene Callaway was looking to establish a foothold in what was the fastest growing segment for golf balls. The goal was to produce a ball which would not just fill a hole for them at the sub forty dollar realm, but one that also brought a soft feel, higher launch, straight distance, and control around the greens. The ERC Soft did that, quickly gaining popularity among the golfers who represent the biggest portion of the bell curve.
All of that said, although golfers have enjoyed the soft feel and extreme distance through its two iterations, some feedback fell into questioning just how different it was performance wise from others in the lineup at a lower price point, like the SuperSoft. Yes, the ERC Soft is a three-piece compared to the SuperSoft’s two, but there was something in the equation missing to really set it apart not just among other Callaway golf balls, but this segment as a whole. They believe they have done that now.

Don’t fret, the soft feel and extreme distance is still packed into this three-piece design, it might actually be longer. Callaway started with the core and brought their Hyper Elastic SoftFast Core over from Chrome Soft. This was done because the technology in that core works on a molecular level to increase the resiliency of the material by activating more cross-sections. That resiliency means even more speed potential without any sacrifice of compression or feel changes.

The High Speed Mantle keeps the energy transfer between layers efficient, and that is what ties the SoftFast Core together with what is sure to be the most eye catching improvement, the implementation of Callaway’s new GRIP Urethane Coating on the Hybrid Cover. This coating is focused purely on wedge performance and has a higher “elongation point” (how much stretch it can take before breaking) which quite literally keeps the ball on the wedge face longer to increase spin with a flatter trajectory as well. How much spin? Callaway is claiming around 400 RPM more than the previous version of the ERC Soft, which is a massive increase.

You wanted differentiation? It would certainly appear that Callaway was listening. If that wasn’t enough though, they are also bringing the ERC Soft REVA to market in 2023, which is the same impressive design, but with its unique purple and charcoal colorway for the Triple Track which comes standard on both versions.

The Details
The 2023 Callaway ERC Soft is aimed at the golfer who wants more distance, softer feel, and any extra spin around the green they can get. With the implementation of the new GRIP Urethane, hitting stores on 1/27/23 at $39.99, this golf ball might just take that segment by storm and increase Callaway’s golf ball market share surge even more.
Are you the type of player who could benefit from what Callaway is bringing to the table with the 2023 ERC Soft? Let us know why, or why not, on the THP Community or in the comments below!




Nice. I know a few guys that love the ERC. I’m sure they’ll be excited for these.
Haven’t played this style of Callaway ball what was the pricing previously to this update?
Interesting release. Would really enjoy an article or video breaking down each Callaway ball and its performance.
[QUOTE=”Golfers Anonymous, post: 11224440, member: 59233″]
Haven’t played this style of Callaway ball what was the pricing previously to this update?
[/QUOTE]
The original came out back in early 2021 and it was priced at $34.99
My ball for the last 2 seasons, I look forward to giving the newest iteration a run. I’ve never been a huge wedge spin guy, but I will take what I can get if the ball can help.
Had loved the two colors previously so I guess I will have some purple this year as well. Thanks for the write up [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]
I’ve played a few of these I found and it seems like a pretty decent ball. 400 rpm is a big difference from one generation to the next.
This is the most confusing segment of golf balls to me.
Nice write up [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] – I agree with [USER=10652]@obedt[/USER] above and reading that is also my main question.
Is there a way that not even just that there could be someone with a slower swing speed do a video comparison with the different balls, not just Callaway, but these new softs balls that are coming out. They have been so interesting as I learn more about golf balls the more I realize I don’t know about them. I think a lot of us in the non tour market would really appreciate seeing a lot of the different balls and their performance capabilities for us not at the top of the game as we search for our 2023 ball of choice.
Purple and Slate (charcoal) were also my wedding colors, which has me very interested in that ball just because of the color similarity and it would match my full suit when out on the course.
Cool to see this ball get updated. Played the OG version of it and liked it. Pretty cool with the Reva version. A lot will be happy with the update and the Reva addition!
And this is why I don’t end up playing the Supersofts even when I’m feeling too cheap to buy tour balls. For just a little bit more I can get better greenside performance and TT.
Oh baby. There’s almost no reason not to try this especially early in the season with the conditions we will see
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 11224462, member: 1193″]
I’ve played a few of these I found and it seems like a pretty decent ball. 400 rpm is a big difference from one generation to the next.
This is the most confusing segment of golf balls to me.
[/QUOTE]
400 RPM is huuuuuuuuuuuge for sure.
I think it’s an interesting spot in golf ball, that 30-40.00 range has got a chance to be extremely popular, and some. Range have dug in pretty well there. This moving to the new GRIP Urethane coating seems to really be throwing down the gauntlet in that area.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 11224462, member: 1193″]
I’ve played a few of these I found and it seems like a pretty decent ball. 400 rpm is a big difference from one generation to the next.
This is the most confusing segment of golf balls to me.
[/QUOTE]
I played them when they first came out because of my thoughts on Triple Track. I went away from them when that alignment came to Chrome Soft. Yet my lowest round of the year last year was shot with ERC, so I might have to give them a try again.
What other competitors do they have in the segment this sits in, Q-star Tour?
I really am excited that this one now is getting clearly differentiated from SuperSoft besides just 3-piece vs 2-piece.
The cover differentiator now should really let it stand on its own.
[QUOTE=”BuckNasty, post: 11224495, member: 48132″]
What other competitors do they have in the segment this sits in, Q-star Tour?
[/QUOTE]
I am not sure.
Q-Star Tour has a urethane cover. Tour Speed does as well.
This is pretty different and I am not sure it really has a segment. Cover modifiers are not often found across the board, so I would probably say it is its own segment.
Definitely intrigued by the GRIP Urethane cover. I thought the original was a solid ball for my game and with the improvements detailed in the review in the 2023 version, I will certainly give them a try.
[QUOTE=”Golfers Anonymous, post: 11224440, member: 59233″]
Haven’t played this style of Callaway ball what was the pricing previously to this update?
[/QUOTE]
I’ve got some (last release) with your name on them next time we tee it up.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 11224497, member: 1579″]
I really am excited that this one now is getting clearly differentiated from SuperSoft besides just 3-piece vs 2-piece.
The cover differentiator now should really let it stand on its own.
[/QUOTE]
I thought the covers have been different all along. Might be an update to the cover but when we went to the Grandaddy in 2018 they discussed this ball and it was never a surelyn cover which is what SS is.
The cover development is a welcome addition to an already good ball. I gave this ball a run for a minute when it first came out. I loved it off the tee. More spin on approach and in the short game will have a lot more people looking at it.
Thanks, [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER].
Very excited for these, felt like I was in my own thread for a bit on the last ones once I latched onto to these balls last year. Triple Track, good price, and performance that matched up pretty well with my game.
Very excited to see how they compare and like what they did with the Reva color ways.
[QUOTE=”ttucliffhanger, post: 11224502, member: 40538″]
I thought the covers have been different all along.
[/QUOTE]
They have, though the new SuperSoft does use a hybrid blend much more similar. But, there is a bigger story now that the average consumer will cling to and we will see it here, anytime the word urethane is used, even in a coating/hybrid.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 11224508, member: 1579″]
They have, though the new SuperSoft does use a hybrid blend much more similar. But, there is a bigger story now that the average consumer will cling to and we will see it here, anytime the word urethane is used, even in a coating/hybrid.
[/QUOTE]
Your statement was just a little confusing. Thanks for the clarification.
[QUOTE=”Sox_Fan, post: 11224499, member: 9583″]
Definitely intrigued by the GRIP Urethane cover. I thought the original was a solid ball for my game and with the improvements detailed in the review in the 2023 version, I will certainly give them a try.
[/QUOTE]
It’s not a urethane cover, fwiw. The GRIP Urethane coating is part of the hybrid cover equation, but it’s not a true urethane cover.
[USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]. Great write up this golf ball has always interested me.
Which player this this golf ball for? A player who wants a soft feeling golf ball with more tour like qualities at a cheaper price?
If you were a consumer how would you know if you were ready to make the step from an ERC Soft to the Chromesoft family (obviously a fitting would tell you too).
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 11224508, member: 1579″]
They have, though the new SuperSoft does use a hybrid blend much more similar. But, there is a bigger story now that the average consumer will cling to and we will see it here, anytime the word urethane is used, even in a coating/hybrid.
[/QUOTE]
So do they coat the cover with urethane to get those properties or is it blended into a version of the last hybrid cover that came from the partnership with DuPont? Really curious on the materials side
[QUOTE=”hadi05, post: 11224515, member: 50784″]
[USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]. Great write up this golf ball has always interested me.
Which player this this golf ball for? A player who wants a soft feeling golf ball with more tour like qualities at a cheaper price?
If you were a consumer how would you know if you were ready to make the step from an ERC Soft to the Chromesoft family (obviously a fitting would tell you too).
[/QUOTE]
The player who wants soft feel at a super low compression, extreme distance, but more greenside precision. The straight forward player, really.
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 11224519, member: 62865″]
So do they coat the cover with urethane to get those properties or is it blended into a version of the last hybrid cover that came from the partnership with DuPont? Really curious on the materials side
[/QUOTE]
It’s a coating on top of the cover, some other companies have done some similar things
I like the Reva’s TT colorway
going to have to give those a try
Seems like Callaway has made some improvements to close the gap and make this ball better. The spin claims are crazy and something I would have no way of testing outside of trying to put these against others in their category and see what happens. I liked ERC but for me it was a little too soft and didnt provide the distance through the bag that the CSX does. I am sure those who play these will welcome the updates.
Does these get the same “precision technology” for quality control as the chrome soft line of was that not added to this manufacturing line? The box logo highlights the grip urethane tech. Given the price point I could see how they might not.
[QUOTE=”mikeg_74, post: 11224540, member: 15992″]
Seems like Callaway has made some improvements to close the gap and make this ball better. The spin claims are crazy and something I would have no way of testing outside of trying to put these against others in their category and see what happens. I liked ERC but for me it was a little too soft and didnt provide the distance through the bag that the CSX does. I am sure those who play these will welcome the updates.
[/QUOTE]
I feel in a very welcoming mood this morning with this release ?
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 11224545, member: 62865″]
Does these get the same “precision technology” for quality control as the chrome soft line of was that not added to this manufacturing line? The box logo highlights the grip urethane tech. Given the price point I could see how they might not.
[/QUOTE]
Every Callaway golf ball goes through that process.
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 11224545, member: 62865″]
Does these get the same “precision technology” for quality control as the chrome soft line of was that not added to this manufacturing line? The box logo highlights the grip urethane tech. Given the price point I could see how they might not.
[/QUOTE]
I genuinely don’t know that, but I bet [USER=19461]@JasonFinleyCG[/USER] can answer it. I did not think so as of yet, but not sure.
While this looks and sounds like a golf ball that sort of just created it’s own segment, I think consumers may bucket it with the other balls in the $30-$40 price range. And that’s ok because it will do well against those offerings. I’m curious how many other companies will follow suit in modifying covers now.
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 11224550, member: 62865″]
I feel in a very welcoming mood this morning with this release ?
[/QUOTE]
Honestly, these kinds of golf balls would benefit a majority of amateurs in a lot of ways. Built on extreme distance and a soft feel, there is a ton to like. But, we are sort of programmed on the internet to HAVE to play a Tour ball. ?
[QUOTE=”PhillyV, post: 11224556, member: 6890″]
While this looks and sounds like a golf ball that sort of just created it’s own segment, I think consumers may bucket it with the other balls in the $30-$40 price range. And that’s ok because it will do well against those offerings. I’m curious how many other companies will follow suit in modifying covers now.
[/QUOTE]
It’s competing with the other balls in that segment, that’s the goal, dig into that realm and increase market share. It’s a competitive area.
This is the ball that had 400 rpm more spin on a 20 yard short game shot 😳
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 11224527, member: 1579″]
The player who wants soft feel at a super low compression, extreme distance, but more greenside precision. The straight forward player, really.
[/QUOTE]
That makes sense to me. Thanks!
[QUOTE=”captaincaution, post: 11224563, member: 20606″]
This is the ball that had 400 rpm more spin on a 20 yard short game shot 😳
[/QUOTE]
I had to do a double take when I learned about it. 400 rpm is massive.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 11224527, member: 1579″]
The player who wants soft feel at a super low compression, extreme distance, but more greenside precision. The straight forward player, really.
[/QUOTE]
The greenside precision has me very intrigued. This ball checks many boxes for me. I will likely try it at some point this season.
Might have to give a sleeve a try. Like the reva colorway too.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 11224558, member: 1579″]
Honestly, these kinds of golf balls would benefit a majority of amateurs in a lot of ways. Built on extreme distance and a soft feel, there is a ton to like. But, we are sort of programmed on the internet to HAVE to play a Tour ball. ?
[/QUOTE]
Even setting aside the price considerations, the y characteristics of this one should fit a bunch of folks really well. I know it does for me with knocking spin off the driver, keeping in the first cut instead of under a tree. And if I play a one hop and stop checker around the green it was because I messed up, give me a nice little controller chip with good weight that starts rolling as soon as it can.
[QUOTE=”pumbaa, post: 11224587, member: 24169″]
Might have to give a sleeve a try. Like the reva colorway too.
[/QUOTE]
I dig the reva colorway as well. Glad it’s the same ball.
Good chance it will be the first box I get after I burn through my current ERC stash. I think it’s six boxes which could into summer or be gone by Easter if I can’t tame my tee game ?
[USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] do you think there is a swing speed in which you would “outgrow” this ball?
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 11224599, member: 62865″]
I dig the reva colorway as well. Glad it’s the same ball.
Good chance it will be the first box I get after I burn through my current ERC stash. I think it’s six boxes which could into summer or be gone by Easter if I can’t tame my tee game ?
[/QUOTE]
I have 6 boxes of chromesofts, a dozen srixon prototypes, and the Wilson zips I got from the secret holiday thread, if I buy more than a sleeve of these my wife might harm me.
[QUOTE=”hadi05, post: 11224602, member: 50784″]
[USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] do you think there is a swing speed in which you would “outgrow” this ball?
[/QUOTE]
I don’t think there’s a hard and fast rule/answer to that
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 11224605, member: 1579″]
I don’t think there’s a hard and fast rule/answer to that
[/QUOTE]
How is durability on the urethane spray? Does it wear off or will it last until the golf ball is scuffed and no longer used?
[QUOTE=”pumbaa, post: 11224611, member: 24169″]
How is durability on the urethane spray? Does it wear off or will it last until the golf ball is scuffed and no longer used?
[/QUOTE]
I wouldn’t just call it a spray either fwiw, we tend to visualize one extreme to the next hahahaha
The durability will be longer than most golfers manage to not lose a golf ball id venture. ?
Compared the ERC to the Q-Star Tour last year. The ERC was longer and stopped fine on full shots. The Q-Star Tour was much better on approach shots 100 and in as well as partials. Different covers obviously so will try a sleeve of this new release for comparison. I thought it sat really well at $35. Not so sure about $40.
[QUOTE=”just8abug, post: 11224637, member: 12543″]
Compared the ERC to the Q-Star Tour last year. The ERC was longer and stopped fine on full shots. The Q-Star Tour was much better on approach shots 100 and in as well as partials. Different covers obviously so will try a sleeve of this new release for comparison. I thought it sat really well at $35. Not so sure about $40.
[/QUOTE]
39.99
I’m teasing.
But seriously, I’d be prepared for price increases across the golf ball segment.