What do you look for in a golf ball? Is it distance? Soft feel? Accuracy? Maybe a urethane cover?
Undoubtedly, you are sitting there nodding your head “YES!”, just like the hopeless golfing addicts which we all are, so, what if I told you that Callaway has a ball which checks all those boxes?
What if I told you it is only $39.99? Do I still have your attention?
Well, what if I told you that ball was the ERC Soft?

2023 Callaway ERC Soft
Now, before you accuse me of trying to pull one over on you, sit back and see why the newest iteration of the ERC Soft does, in fact, check all those aforementioned performance traits off of the list. You see, while on the internet, we golfers tend to believe to have a golf ball that offers all of those things then you absolutely must use a “Tour” style golf ball, but there is much more to it than that.

When ERC Soft came onto the scene Callaway was looking to establish a foothold in what was the fastest growing segment for golf balls. The goal was to produce a ball which would not just fill a hole for them at the sub forty dollar realm, but one that also brought a soft feel, higher launch, straight distance, and control around the greens. The ERC Soft did that, quickly gaining popularity among the golfers who represent the biggest portion of the bell curve.
All of that said, although golfers have enjoyed the soft feel and extreme distance through its two iterations, some feedback fell into questioning just how different it was performance wise from others in the lineup at a lower price point, like the SuperSoft. Yes, the ERC Soft is a three-piece compared to the SuperSoft’s two, but there was something in the equation missing to really set it apart not just among other Callaway golf balls, but this segment as a whole. They believe they have done that now.

Don’t fret, the soft feel and extreme distance is still packed into this three-piece design, it might actually be longer. Callaway started with the core and brought their Hyper Elastic SoftFast Core over from Chrome Soft. This was done because the technology in that core works on a molecular level to increase the resiliency of the material by activating more cross-sections. That resiliency means even more speed potential without any sacrifice of compression or feel changes.

The High Speed Mantle keeps the energy transfer between layers efficient, and that is what ties the SoftFast Core together with what is sure to be the most eye catching improvement, the implementation of Callaway’s new GRIP Urethane Coating on the Hybrid Cover. This coating is focused purely on wedge performance and has a higher “elongation point” (how much stretch it can take before breaking) which quite literally keeps the ball on the wedge face longer to increase spin with a flatter trajectory as well. How much spin? Callaway is claiming around 400 RPM more than the previous version of the ERC Soft, which is a massive increase.

You wanted differentiation? It would certainly appear that Callaway was listening. If that wasn’t enough though, they are also bringing the ERC Soft REVA to market in 2023, which is the same impressive design, but with its unique purple and charcoal colorway for the Triple Track which comes standard on both versions.

The Details
The 2023 Callaway ERC Soft is aimed at the golfer who wants more distance, softer feel, and any extra spin around the green they can get. With the implementation of the new GRIP Urethane, hitting stores on 1/27/23 at $39.99, this golf ball might just take that segment by storm and increase Callaway’s golf ball market share surge even more.
Are you the type of player who could benefit from what Callaway is bringing to the table with the 2023 ERC Soft? Let us know why, or why not, on the THP Community or in the comments below!





[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 11224643, member: 1579″]
39.99
I’m teasing.
But seriously, I’d be prepared for price increases across the golf ball segment.
[/QUOTE]
😉 You’re right and I am….as much as it pains me.
The triple track tweak is interesting. Wonder if there is something to it or just a bit of desire/need to be fresh
[ATTACH type=”full”]9150137[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 11224659, member: 62865″]
The triple track tweak is interesting. Wonder if there is something to it or just a bit of desire/need to be fresh
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”DD59B0DA-4670-499A-BCCB-7ABAC253C5AD.jpeg”]9150137[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
The dagger was personally designed by [USER=19461]@JasonFinleyCG[/USER] for use at the GOAT Cup and Grandaddy to explain the outcome to THPers.
None of that is true. :ROFLMAO:
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 11224628, member: 1579″]
I wouldn’t just call it a spray either fwiw, we tend to visualize one extreme to the next hahahaha
The durability will be longer than most golfers manage to not lose a golf ball id venture. ?
[/QUOTE]
I was asking for other I’m losing it by hole 6
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 11224659, member: 62865″]
The triple track tweak is interesting. Wonder if there is something to it or just a bit of desire/need to be fresh
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”DD59B0DA-4670-499A-BCCB-7ABAC253C5AD.jpeg”]9150137[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
There was some feedback that influenced that decision.
We weren’t shown the design at Callaway, but I kind of like it. More of a definitive point to aim with.
I’m re-reading this again along with the comments. Everything else had my interest. This might be my 23 ball, Reva colorway to me is awesome. The selling points on this seem to be great. I might be in – I’ll have to see if there’s a place with a launch monitor that I could do some testing during the winter here after they are all out. Maybe buy a few different sleeves.
Thanks for the preview [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]. I have always liked the ERC when I played it. I will have to give the new version a try. The extra spin is huge and with the chrome soft core being used and cover update the price is still really good!
Good write up [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] ! I have tried the Callaway ERC a few times in the past. I’m a big fan of Triple Track Technology! I always felt a little disappointed after using it. It did everything well, but never great. Green side spin was my biggest issue. Maybe I need to give these another look?
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 11224535, member: 1579″]
It’s a coating on top of the cover, some other companies have done some similar things
[/QUOTE]
Great write up as always [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]
So is the coating like Spinskin SeRM that is on the Q-Star?
Gotta think there is a CS vs. ERC wedge test coming from someone, somewhere.
[QUOTE=”Iceman!, post: 11224737, member: 32688″]
Great write up as always [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]
So is the coating like Spinskin SeRM that is on the Q-Star?
Gotta think there is a CS vs. ERC wedge test coming from someone, somewhere.
[/QUOTE]
Different modifier.
I want to see a launch monitor comparison between the 23 ERC Soft and the std. Chrome Soft. I am specifically interested in which launches higher and reduces spin more with driver. I need launch and forgiveness off the tee, something the std. Chrome Soft does very well
I’ve never tried these balls. I have no real excuse why. May have to change that
ERC Soft is my current gamer, so I’m anxious to give these a try.
As I’m quickly becoming an old guy, I wouldn’t mind trying these at all.
I have played the original ERC balls, and found them hard compared to the Srixon Q-star Tours. I like the TT feature, but these balls for me, did not touch the Srixons.
The tacky cover feels very good. Reminds me of the Bridgestone S models.
I was looking at the last years ERC at Golf Galaxy the other day. All the write ups on the mid-tier balls lately have been great. Really appreciate it [USER=1193]@Hawk[/USER] and [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]. This is exactly the sweet spot in price that I look for. Going to be snagging a some ERCs this season to give them a shot.
Good article. I had got away from ERC for various reasons but will pick up some of the new ERC Reva as soon as I see them.
[QUOTE=”oumagic, post: 11225099, member: 52535″]
Good article. I had got away from ERC for various reasons but will pick up some of the new ERC Reva as soon as I see them.
[/QUOTE]
do you think the changes address some of the reasons you went another way? or you just got away because of…
[media=giphy]NoHe3HpB1Mg8w[/media]
So with the new coating on the cover is this also going to help durability? The prior version (for me) was terrible for durability, cover would get chewed up easily.
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 11225115, member: 62865″]
do you think the changes address some of the reasons you went another way? or you just got away because of…
[media=giphy]NoHe3HpB1Mg8w[/media]
[/QUOTE]
If they added any spin around the green, that is a plus. I could play the prior version but wanted a little more there. I fell out of love with triple track when I switched putters and I think the new color way is worth a try. I had switched to Chrome Soft from ERC and then away from CS due to cost, so new ERC might be good for me.
[QUOTE=”xThor, post: 11225062, member: 19092″]
The tacky cover feels very good. Reminds me of the Bridgestone S models.
[/QUOTE]
Hmm… Launch Monitor Wedge testing forthcoming? (Please & Thank You!)
As someone who doesn’t like the price point for tour balls this is a welcome addition. 400 additional RPM is superb. I wonder about that cover…how durable is it, how long does it retain its properties to add extra spin? And does the effect carry down into the scoring irons – could we expect more spin with say a 9i?
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 11224659, member: 62865″]
The triple track tweak is interesting. Wonder if there is something to it or just a bit of desire/need to be fresh
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”DD59B0DA-4670-499A-BCCB-7ABAC253C5AD.jpeg”]9150137[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
At the Grandaddy, we were told about these coming and the new “dagger” setup, but not much on details. This looks even better than I thought it would.
I can’t wait to try this new setup. Being I am one to lose way too many golf balls and the expected price increase coming, I am looking forward to trying these.
[QUOTE=”tequila4kapp, post: 11225282, member: 9704″]
As someone who doesn’t like the price point for tour balls this is a welcome addition.
[/QUOTE]
I was of the same mindset as you the last few years- however the 2023 version is now $39.99 from $34.99- so if we’re saying that we’re ok with $5.00 increase, why would we reject a $5-$10 to go to those tour balls if they perform better for you individually??
[QUOTE=”jlew2144, post: 11225434, member: 40346″]
I was of the same mindset as you the last few years- however the 2023 version is now $39.99 from $34.99- so if we’re saying that we’re ok with $5.00 increase, why would we reject a $5-$10 to go to those tour balls if they perform better for you individually??
[/QUOTE]
because rumors have tour balls coming out at the $60 mark
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 11225440, member: 62865″]
because rumors have tour balls coming out at the $60 mark
[/QUOTE]
Apparently I missed that rumor……:oops::oops: Thanks.
You can really feel the difference on the cover of this ball compared to previous generations. Also, I really liked the new TT. Got a few of these back in November at our sales meeting. Proceeded to put one in the water, and then one somewhere in the deep rough that we couldn’t find at Gainey Ranch out in AZ. Neither bad shot had anything to do with the ball and more to do with how bad my swing was that day.
[QUOTE=”jlew2144, post: 11225434, member: 40346″]
I was of the same mindset as you the last few years- however the 2023 version is now $39.99 from $34.99- so if we’re saying that we’re ok with $5.00 increase, why would we reject a $5-$10 to go to those tour balls if they perform better for you individually??
[/QUOTE]
[media=giphy]1fgI4bZpCo9S57r4Vd[/media]
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 11224628, member: 1579″]
The durability will be longer than most golfers manage to not lose a golf ball id venture. ?
[/QUOTE]
[media=giphy]1zTqgW6bS2jWU[/media]
Seriously, though, this sounds like its right up my alley. A soft urethane distance ball? With Triple Track? Yes, please.
I’ve gamed a few ERC Softs in the past, they feel great but always found them lacking to other balls in my bag. This addition to the cover is definitely going to impress those who love this ball. I’ll have to give it a test but at that price I think there are others that suit my game for a few $$ more, will have to wait and see.
Looking forward to trying, I liked everything about the ball except around the green. Will try it and see how this version stacks up.
If other companies can bring a true urethane cover at a similar or lower price point why does Callaway not just do it as well?
Do they feel a modifier is more advantageous than using a urethane cover ?
Or is it a cost/margin grab (meaning it’s less costly for the modifier but we’ll charge what others do for their “soft urethane” offering) and take the extra margin on it ?
never Thought I’d see the day of $40 surlyn balls.
:unsure:
I remember thinking the first version of this ball was too low spin off driver for me and I lost distance. That nay still be the case but the changes make me interested enough to try them again
The new urathane coating and dagger TT sound fantastic!
Is the change to TT only going here to be in these for the first year like the original TT was on the first version of ERC?
The Reva ERC? So dope!
I think I’m going to have to grab some Reva’s. Color scheme is dope! ERC was already a fun ball and now, with it being even longer, this sounds like a blast.
[QUOTE=”jdtox, post: 11225868, member: 5944″]
I’ve gamed a few ERC Softs in the past, they feel great but always found them lacking to other balls in my bag. This addition to the cover is definitely going to impress those who love this ball. I’ll have to give it a test but at that price I think there are others that suit my game for a few $$ more, will have to wait and see.
[/QUOTE]
Curious for your game, what areas did you find it lacking compared to others?
I ask because I know you like to dabble with a bunch of balls throughout the early season before picking the honored ones to go win a trophy with.
TT color scheme on the Reva is nice! I might give these a try this year – I love the Supersoft and Chrome Soft both, so a ball at an in-between price point that’s a mix of both balls at least interests me enough to give it a shot.
Thanks James.
I like the look of the updated TT, especially the Reva. I thought the previous version of the ERC was a good ball. I’ll definitely try the new one this season.
My wife is a big fan of the ERC ball, so much that every time I find one, it goes straight into her bag so rarely get an opportunity to play one. Hopefully this year if I snag one, I’ll keep it out of sight and give it a go.
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 11227386, member: 62865″]
Curious for your game, what areas did you find it lacking compared to others?
I ask because I know you like to dabble with a bunch of balls throughout the early season before picking the honored ones to go win a trophy with.
[/QUOTE]
It’s been a minute since I’ve played one but if I recall It was a little too soft for my liking and greenside spin was lacking, other than that I enjoyed the experience. This new version sounds like at least one of those areas could be better. I kind of dig the new dagger TT too.
FWIW CSX has ended up in my bag at the end of the year the last 2 years
I’m excited to give these a go, I want to SEE the 400 rpm versus the previous model for my own eyes, because that is a TON of added spin.
[QUOTE=”just8abug, post: 11224637, member: 12543″]
I thought it sat really well at $35. Not so sure about $40.
[/QUOTE]
I love the first two versions of the ERC and still play them even though I think the $35 price was a little high for a non-urethane ball, even though it is a unique to Callaway hybrid cover. They have addressed that, I guess, with the urethane coating but agree about the $40 price. So many good urethane balls at less than that price.
Also, is my memory faulty? I thought the triple track technology was based on the spacing of the lines, the thickness of the lines and [I]also the color[/I]s. The Reva version is not red and blue like triple track has been. Maybe it isn’t the actual colors, but the relationship between the colors used?
[QUOTE=”Phil75070, post: 11227900, member: 22997″]
Also, is my memory faulty? I thought the triple track technology was based on the spacing of the lines, the thickness of the lines and [I]also the color[/I]s. The Reva version is not red and blue like triple track has been. Maybe it isn’t the actual colors, but the relationship between the colors used?
[/QUOTE]
That’s a great question. It crossed my mind as well.
I think they offered a green and grey one on the chrome softs that I played a box of. I didn’t notice any marked change in performance.
[QUOTE=”Muchmore18, post: 11227357, member: 56094″]
Is the change to TT only going here to be in these for the first year like the original TT was on the first version of ERC?
[/QUOTE]
Just a little bump to this in case anyone knows
This is a quality ball, if I was a higher spin player I would definitely be putting this in play. CSX is too good for me to switch from it, but saving a $10/dozen is very enticing.
Nice article. I tend to be quite stubborn on staying to my golf ball type but I may test it out to see how this feels.
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 11227964, member: 62865″]
That’s a great question. It crossed my mind as well.
I think they offered a green and grey one on the chrome softs that I played a box of. I didn’t notice any marked change in performance.
[/QUOTE]
The colors are important. The biggest thing is contrast in the colors – this played into what colors we choose when not red and blue. This is why those who use three black lines are not getting as much benefit.