It is hard to believe that it was six years ago now that TaylorMade golf caused a shockwave throughout iron design with the introduction of the P790’s. Six years later, today introduces a new fourth generation of the P790 and as has been the case, it may be the same name, but it is not the same old iron. No matter what you think of their direction in recent years, when it comes to this specific set of irons, TaylorMade has never stopped pushing.
So, the most versatile iron in TaylorMade’s arsenal is definitely back to try and keep its foothold as a premier part of the hollow body player’s distance segment it was a founding part of.

2023 TaylorMade P790 Irons
This time around, TaylorMade is flat out telling you, it’s what is inside that counts, but that has always kind of been the mantra for the P790 when you think about it. Sure, it is a more playable and forgiving iron that was among the first to break minds with its in hand looks by giving golfers who can’t game a traditional MB the chance to play something that looks like one.

Talking aesthetics, the 4th generation of the P790 is obviously going to be extremely familiar. It retains that muscleback like look thanks to its hollow body design, but TaylorMade has again massaged the shape to improve the appeal. The pearl satin finish this time is intersected by a single band of TaylorMade’s “tour satin scratch” that breaks things up and at the same time remains cohesive to the overall design.

Spec wise, TaylorMade has actually kept the lofts the same in the 2023 P790 as they did the 2021 version, with the irons playing off of a 30.5-degree 7i and 45-degree PW. That is in large part thanks to all of the internal changes going on. As you will see below, thanks to the fantastic cutaway internal pics that TaylorMade is putting out there of the four generations of P790, this is by far the busiest version under the hood.

The forged hollow construction itself has always allowed more ability for the designers to place discretionary weight to impact flight and forgiveness, but the development has kept pushing boundaries. This year the actual opening where the Forged 4041 face plate attaches to the body is larger than ever which means the tungsten weighting of each iron is now the furthest to the toe we have seen yet. There is up to 38g of tungsten per iron that has helped increase the sweet spot while also toning down any hot spot issues the previous versions have had.

Internally there is also a “Thick Thin Back Wall” which is now using a honeycomb structure to allow more mass to be moved while not sacrificing any strength. This is working in conjunction with the Sound Stabilization Bar and return of SpeedFoam Air which is 69% less dense than what was used in the first two P790’s creating a more solid sound/feel at impact which has improved with each version of the P790 we have seen thus far.

The biggest story this time, however, for TaylorMade is the “Individual Mass Optimization” and “FLTD CG”. In the past, they have designed unique faces for each club in the set, but now the internals of every single iron are also unique. All the previously discussed features are in each iron, but formed in a way to create optimal performance for each club and give the users what they need there. That blends to the FLTD CG which addresses some CG issues with the 2021 version moving the CG of the long irons down almost 1 mm (which in design is a ton) to increase launch and shifting it up into the 6/7 part of the bag to add a bit of spin.

Of course, we cannot forget that all of these things still work in tandem with TaylorMade’s long patented Thru Slot Speed Pocket. What does it all mean? Well, according to TaylorMade it means an iron that again looks more demanding than it plays. The P790 remains focused on speed, forgiveness, and distance but this time it would certainly appear that all of that is in the most tuned designs we have seen from TaylorMade thus far.
The Details
TaylorMade will be selling the 2023 P790’s for $1,399 (steel) or $1,499 (graphite) in 7-piece standard sets, and of course individual irons will be available. The irons will be available in 3-PW and AW in both right and left handed orientations. Standard shafts will be True Temper DG 105 (S) or DG 95 (S/R) in steel and Mitsubishi Chemical MMT in 75 (S), 65 (R), and 55 (A) with Golf Pride Z-Grip +2’s.
The P790’s will be available for pre-order on 8/8/23 and at retail on 9/1/23.
Has a Ping like redesign this year in the looks department.
Will produce great ball speed and look pretty good doing it.
Got to see these last week. It’s weird that I always expect them to look more different than they do. I shouldn’t, but at first glance it was kind of eh, that’s it? They are different on the inside though and should be an improvement. Don’t fix what’s not broken I guess.
[QUOTE=”hedley_lamarr08, post: 11678283, member: 37622″]
Will produce great ball speed and look pretty good doing it.
[/QUOTE]
Indeed, the sound/feel becomes the question, and some early feedback has been it’s more of the same even with the changes they’ve made internally.
p790 has become an industry in itself. Always a popular release.
I really like the version that’s out now. I’m sure these will perform pretty similar
I’ve always found the P790’s and P770’s to be some of the better looking irons. I’ve swung them both before and had really nice numbers. Definitely looking forward to giving the new 790’s a go.
[QUOTE=”templeton80, post: 11678473, member: 53139″]
p790 has become an industry in itself. Always a popular release.
[/QUOTE]
I think it’s their best iron on the market
[QUOTE=”ddec, post: 11678529, member: 782″]
I think it’s their best iron on the market
[/QUOTE]
I can’t say that you are wrong. It is pretty good. I always feel that their p770 has huge potential that is missed.
Those looks great. Some of my best iron play has come from playing TM irons. I think I would have a lot of fun with these.
[USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] how does the size compare to some of the previous releases?
Four generations in 6 years! That’s a new P-790 every 1.5 years. Is technology really moving at that rate or is it trying to dial in/correct the design? Also “thick thin back wall”? I guess it’s more catchy than saying variable thickness.
It is amazing how similar but different the irons look in the 4 different versions. The specs are pretty similar across all 4 versions as well. To see the tungsten weight moved around so much shows that they are not just copying one version to the other. I tried V3 and was really impressed with how they felt and performed.
[QUOTE=”War Eagle, post: 11678586, member: 6727″]
Those looks great. Some of my best iron play has come from playing TM irons. I think I would have a lot of fun with these.
[USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] how does the size compare to some of the previous releases?
[/QUOTE]
I’ve not seen them in hand yet, but it’s pretty much identical to past 790’s
The internal cutaways are solid. If they made sound improvement, this could be a good set
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 11678659, member: 3″]
The internal cutaways are solid. If they made sound improvement, this could be a good set
[/QUOTE]
Im honestly shocked they made the cutaways of a ll four generations available, it’s a hell of a way to show evolution.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 11678665, member: 1579″]
Im honestly shocked they made the cutaways of a ll four generations available, it’s a hell of a way to show evolution.
[/QUOTE]
I know many believe irons are irons, but so much goes into design. I have been pretty critical in my thoughts on P790s in the past from the feel stand point, but this appears to be a good step forward on the surface
[QUOTE=”Thrillbilly Jim, post: 11678613, member: 50607″]
Four generations in 6 years! That’s a new P-790 every 1.5 years. Is technology really moving at that rate or is it trying to dial in/correct the design? Also “thick thin back wall”? I guess it’s more catchy than saying variable thickness.
[/QUOTE]
The Dad Bod of iron design – thick thin. :ROFLMAO:
Like the look and the satin finish looks sharp.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 11678665, member: 1579″]
Im honestly shocked they made the cutaways of a ll four generations available, it’s a hell of a way to show evolution.
[/QUOTE]
It keeps people from just looking at the outside and saying it’s the same iron repackaged. I’m sure there will still be plenty of that on the Internet, but the picture helps tell the story of what changed. I’m hoping continuing the name means a new P790 UDI is under development.
[QUOTE=”hackitup, post: 11678696, member: 42140″]
It keeps people from just looking at the outside and saying it’s the same iron repackaged. I’m sure there will still be plenty of that on the Internet, but the picture helps tell the story of what changed. I’m hoping continuing the name means a new P790 UDI is under development.
[/QUOTE]
Gotta do something when you use the same exact letter number naming every time I suppose
I think the article tells the story pretty well too ?
Man. I think these look fantastic. A must-try for sure.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 11678707, member: 1193″]
Man. I think these look fantastic. A must-try for sure.
[/QUOTE]
They’re just, really really clean.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 11678709, member: 1579″]
They’re just, really really clean.
[/QUOTE]
I think a satin finish on irons is super underrated.
I need more speed pocket in my life.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 11678709, member: 1579″]
They’re just, really really clean.
[/QUOTE]
Definitely! I feel like I’ve experience both ends of the hollowbody spectrum when it comes to feel. Very curious how these compare.
[QUOTE=”War Eagle, post: 11678716, member: 6727″]
I think a satin finish on irons is super underrated.
I need more speed pocket in my life.
[/QUOTE]
Give me all the satin and none of the polished chrome
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 11678718, member: 1193″]
Definitely! I feel like I’ve experience both ends of the hollowbody spectrum when it comes to feel. Very curious how these compare.
[/QUOTE]
I hope it’s better, I really do. They’ve always been a little on the harsh side
The TM iron recommendation tool says these would be my 91% best fit. Love the look. I do plan to do an iron fitting late 23/early 24 so we’ll see.
I’ve always loved the look of 790’s. That satin finish is always a preference for me.
These look really good in pictures and in hand they look really good. Love the satin finish, I have never tried the P-790’s but would like to give these a swing. I wonder when the next version of the 770’s are set to be released?
Club Champion …. NO difference! 6i results…
[ATTACH type=”full”]9197508[/ATTACH]
I remember well when these were first released and PXG sued for patent infringement. It brought a lot of attention to the “hollow body player distance” design that is now a staple with virtually every OEM. I think the P790 is now one of those iconic irons that will always be remembered by those who love golf equipment.
These are some clean looking game improvement irons. Love the aesthetics. Performance we shall see but they look really good.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 11678467, member: 1579″]
Indeed, the sound/feel becomes the question, and some early feedback has been it’s more of the same even with the changes they’ve made internally.
[/QUOTE]
This club series and the i500 is why I’ve just never been able to commit to hollow. I’m sure it’s gotten better. Hasn’t it?
[QUOTE=”hedley_lamarr08, post: 11679444, member: 37622″]
This club series and the i500 is why I’ve just never been able to commit to hollow. I’m sure it’s gotten better. Hasn’t it?
[/QUOTE]
Ehhhhhh. Mixed bag of feedback right now. We are hoping to get a set in to take a closer look ourselves.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 11679463, member: 1579″]
Ehhhhhh. Mixed bag of feedback right now. We are hoping to get a set in to take a closer look ourselves.
[/QUOTE]
This release is intriguing to me. Not because I want them. Because Cobra, Mizuno, and some others make some nice feeling hollow irons. p770 is excellent. The 790 feels like hitting a railroad spike.
good looking irons, interesting stuff going on on the inside it seems.
These look SO damn good
[QUOTE=”hedley_lamarr08, post: 11679569, member: 37622″]This release is intriguing to me. Not because I want them. Because Cobra, Mizuno, and some others make some nice feeling hollow irons. p770 is excellent. The 790 feels like hitting a railroad spike.[/QUOTE]
Have you hit them? Any gen? A railroad spike is not what comes to mind.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[QUOTE=”Minarets, post: 11680253, member: 3000″]
Have you hit them? Any gen? A railroad spike is not what comes to mind.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[/QUOTE]
I have. Actually try everything I can get my hands on. The first Gen turned me away and I’ve never really considered them.
[QUOTE=”amarkabove, post: 11679396, member: 75272″]
Spin numbers are going to be entirely dependent on the individual and their swing though, no? For example, in your post directly above this one, the new one spun more than the 2021, but in this chart it’s significantly less.
[/QUOTE]
Not usually if compared. Here is the Club Champion comparison!
NO DIFFERENCE!
[ATTACH type=”full”]9197658[/ATTACH]
Still liking my ( i think they were 2020) P790’s but these new ones look nice, but all depends on the person swinging the club on how they compare to the older versions. I do like them, but I also like the Mizuno JPX 923.
[QUOTE=”Minarets, post: 11680253, member: 3000″]
Have you hit them? Any gen? A railroad spike is not what comes to mind.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[/QUOTE]
Oh, it’s pretty accurate imo.
[QUOTE=”BirdieBob, post: 11680374, member: 3526″]
Not usually if compared. Here is the Club Champion comparison!
NO DIFFERENCE!
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”P790CC.jpg”]9197658[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Not true, I look at that and there is better spin, more speed, and clearly a higher peak and better descent that leads to less roll out. That’s an accuracy improvement.
I know people always want revolutionary, but improvement is improvement.
Also, the 7i and long irons had the biggest CG change, that is where they should have tested, not 6i.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 11679463, member: 1579″]
Ehhhhhh. Mixed bag of feedback right now. We are hoping to get a set in to take a closer look ourselves.
[/QUOTE]
Answered my question. Was wondering if you were going to get some in hand to try out.
Some more testing results from Michael Newton Golf….7 iron
Higher club speed = higher ball speed and low spin = more distance
No noticeable difference in feel or sound
[MEDIA=youtube]9mtu94oxsws[/MEDIA]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”790MN.jpg”]9197680[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 11680427, member: 1579″]Oh, it’s pretty accurate imo.[/QUOTE]
Not mine. I went from 921F to 21 P790 and while there is definitely a feel difference I don’t think P790 feel hard at all. They feel powerful to me but not harsh or hard. Not seeing any resemblance to something harsh or hard.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[QUOTE=”Minarets, post: 11681939, member: 3000″]
Not mine. I went from 921F to 21 P790 and while there is definitely a feel difference I don’t think P790 feel hard at all. They feel powerful to me but not harsh or hard. Not seeing any resemblance to something harsh or hard.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[/QUOTE]
I too have hit a few iron sets, here and there, and we will def have to agree to disagree on this one. They’re not as bad as they used to be, but they’re still the most harsh hollow body from a major OEM I’ve hit (3rd gen, as I don’t have the 4th in yet).
[QUOTE=”BirdieBob, post: 11680736, member: 3526″]
Some more testing results from Michael Newton Golf….7 iron
Higher club speed = higher ball speed and low spin = more distance
No noticeable difference in feel or sound
[MEDIA=youtube]9mtu94oxsws[/MEDIA]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”790MN.jpg”]9197680[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Numbers look better across the board. Higher SF also accounts for some of the higher ball speed. Tighter spin SD. I’d have to watch the video to see how thin those three strikes were. But a 97 ft. apex with 45.9 descent off a skinny iron ain’t bad
[ATTACH type=”full”]9199575[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full”]9199576[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full”]9199577[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full”]9199578[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”Thrillbilly Jim, post: 11699743, member: 50607″]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_0152.jpeg”]9199575[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_0153.jpeg”]9199576[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_0154.jpeg”]9199577[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_0155.jpeg”]9199578[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Those look fun. I love the simplicity