Callaway’s approach to golf ball design has increasingly centered on data, manufacturing precision, and real-world performance. Rather than chasing distance at the expense of feel or control, the company has focused on tightening dispersion, improving consistency, and delivering innovative ways to gain speed through new materials.

The 2026 Chrome Tour golf balls build directly on that philosophy. After two strong years of momentum in the Tour ball category, Callaway is refining what already works by increasing ball speed, improving consistency, and maintaining the playing characteristics golfers already trust.
As Gordon Gray, Director of Brand Marketing at Callaway, explained, Chrome Tour has quickly become a cornerstone of the company’s golf ball lineup. For 2026, the focus is not reinvention, but refinement, making a fast and consistent golf ball even better.
What’s New for 2026
While the 2026 Chrome Tour lineup retains the familiar names Chrome Tour, Chrome Tour X, and Chrome Soft, there are meaningful performance upgrades under the hood. The common thread across all three models is added speed and tighter consistency, achieved without forcing golfers to adjust to a different feel.
Tour Fast Mantle: More Speed Without Changing Feel
The headline technology for the 2026 Chrome Tour lineup is a completely new material Callaway calls Tour Fast Mantle. Developed over the last four years in close collaboration with material suppliers, this mantle layer is new to the golf industry and exclusive to Callaway.

Eric Loper, Senior Director of Golf Ball R&D, explained that the goal was to make an already fast golf ball even faster, without relying on higher compression or changing the feel players already trust. “We challenged ourselves to make a golf ball that’s already fast, even faster,” Loper said. “What we didn’t want to do was use compression to get that ball speed. That’s easy, but we feel like we’re in a really good spot with the feel of Chrome Tour, Chrome Tour X, and Chrome Soft.”
The Tour Fast Mantle achieves that by using a material that is 16 percent more rigid than previous mantle designs. In simple terms, a stiffer material behaves like a stronger spring. When the ball compresses at impact, particularly with the driver, it rebounds faster, creating higher ball speed.
“That golf ball is going to deform under load,” Loper explained. “If you have a stiffer spring or a more rigid material, when it compresses and rebounds, it’s going to have higher velocity.”



Beyond raw speed, the new mantle material also expands Callaway’s design flexibility. In Chrome Tour X, it allows engineers to reduce driver spin for added distance while maintaining the high iron and wedge spin players expect. “That golf ball is great around the green,” Loper said. “What we really wanted was to make it longer off the tee, and this material helps us unlock that.”
For Chrome Tour, the approach was different. “We felt like our spin throughout the set was ideal,” Loper said. “All we really wanted to do was make it faster.” The same concept applies to Chrome Soft, which remains Callaway’s lowest-compression urethane ball, now with added speed and slightly lower long-game spin where it benefits golfers most.
Across the lineup, Tour Fast Mantle delivers more distance and speed while preserving the short-game control and feel that Chrome Tour players already expect, making it the most significant technology story for Callaway’s 2026 golf balls.
Seamless Tour Aero: Consistency Regardless of Ball Orientation
Every golf ball is produced in two halves, which creates a parting line where the molds meet. After the cover is formed, excess material remains along that seam. Traditionally, manufacturers remove this excess using a process called seam buffing, which involves grinding down the seam area.
The challenge is that this grinding process is localized. When material is removed only along the seam, the dimples closest to that parting line can become slightly distorted. While those changes are nearly impossible to see with the naked eye, they can influence how air flows around the ball during flight.

In practical terms, that means the same golf ball can fly differently depending on how it is oriented at impact. A shot struck with the seam aligned one way may launch slightly higher or shorter, while the same shot struck with the seam rotated differently may fly lower or longer. Because ball orientation is random on most shots, this can introduce inconsistency, particularly on approach shots into the green.
Callaway’s Seamless Tour Aero approach is designed to address that problem. Instead of relying on localized grinding along the seam, Callaway uses a more uniform finishing process that treats the entire surface of the ball evenly. By maintaining consistent dimple geometry around the full circumference of the ball, flight characteristics remain more stable regardless of how the ball is oriented at impact.
The result is tighter front-to-back dispersion and more predictable distances into the green. Rather than needing a perfectly aligned ball to get a consistent result, golfers benefit from a ball that flies the same way shot after shot.
Precision Technology and Manufacturing Consistency
Beyond materials and aerodynamics, Callaway continues to emphasize what it calls Precision Technology, a manufacturing mindset focused on reducing variation from ball to ball. The goal is not just peak performance, but repeatable performance across an entire dozen.
“To make the perfect golf ball, you really need to understand what makes a golf ball imperfect,” Eric Loper explained. “What we do is audit our products, audit competitor products, and hit golf balls downrange just as a player would experience on the course.”
That approach has driven major investment into Callaway’s golf ball manufacturing and quality control. According to Gordon Gray, the company now captures more than 150 million data points per day, allowing engineers to identify even small sources of inconsistency during production.

One area of focus is paint and surface uniformity. “When the paint layer isn’t uniform, you end up with changes in how air flows over the ball,” Loper said. “That can create instability in flight and lead to wider dispersion.”
For golfers playing a premium Tour ball, that consistency matters. It means the ball you pull from the sleeve should behave predictably, giving players confidence that results are driven by the swing, not hidden variation in the ball.
Our Perspective: Speed and Consistency That Show Up on the Scorecard
From our standpoint, the most compelling part of the 2026 Chrome Tour story is how Callaway managed to push both speed and consistency forward at the same time. Added ball speed, particularly off the driver, is one of the most reliable ways for golfers to lower scores, shorten approach shots, and improve strokes gained off the tee.
What stands out is how that speed was achieved. Rather than changing compression or dramatically altering feel, Callaway used the new Tour Fast Mantle to create real distance gains while preserving the playing characteristics golfers already trust. That balance matters, especially for players who rely on feel and control around the green.

Consistency remains the other half of the equation. Tighter dispersion, more predictable carry distances, and reduced variation from ball to ball all contribute to better scoring over time. When golfers can trust that the ball will fly the same way regardless of orientation or which ball they pull from the sleeve, decision-making becomes simpler and confidence increases.
Just as important, the lineup itself remains clearly defined. Each model serves a distinct purpose, making it easier for golfers to choose a ball that fits their swing speed, spin preferences, and performance priorities rather than guessing between overlapping options.
Callaway Chrome Tour (2026)

Balanced Tour Performance
The 2026 Chrome Tour is designed to be the most balanced option in the lineup. It delivers a strong blend of speed, control, and consistency without pushing spin or feel to extremes.
For 2026, Callaway focused on increasing ball speed while keeping the spin profile intact. The result is more distance off the tee and consistent flight characteristics through the bag, without changing the feel that Chrome Tour players already trust.
Who it’s for:
Golfers looking for Tour-level performance with a balanced combination of speed, control, and consistency.
Callaway Chrome Tour X (2026)

Higher Spin with Added Distance
Chrome Tour X remains the highest-spinning option in the lineup, particularly around the greens and with irons. For 2026, the goal was clear. Keep that short-game and iron control while unlocking more distance off the tee.
The Tour Fast Mantle allows Callaway to lower driver spin while increasing speed, producing longer tee shots and a slightly flatter iron flight. That flatter trajectory can also lead to improved consistency in windy conditions.
Who it’s for:
Players who prefer higher spin and control but want more distance and a more penetrating flight off the tee.
Callaway Chrome Soft (2026)

Soft Feel with More Speed
Chrome Soft continues as Callaway’s softest Tour-caliber golf ball and remains a three-piece construction with a urethane cover. While feel remains the defining trait, the 2026 update brings added speed and slightly lower long-game spin where it helps most.
The result is a golf ball that still feels great around the green but provides more carry distance and efficiency off the tee, helping golfers use less club into approach shots.
Who it’s for:
Golfers who prioritize soft feel and control but still want modern speed and distance benefits.
Final Thoughts
With the 2026 Chrome Tour line, Callaway found a way to make an already fast golf ball noticeably faster, tightened up consistency where it actually shows up on the course, and did it all without asking golfers to give up the feel they’ve come to trust.
What makes this release even more exciting is that members of the 2025 Grandaddy of ’Em All were among the first golfers to put these balls into play. During A/B testing, participants saw immediate increases in ball speed when compared to competing golf balls, reinforcing many of the performance claims Callaway is making for 2026. Those results were not subtle, and you’ll want to keep an eye out for videos from that testing dropping on our social media channels in the coming days.
Whether you’re focused on picking up more speed off the driver, tightening dispersion into greens, or simply playing a ball that performs the same shot after shot, the 2026 Chrome Tour lineup offers clear options that make choosing the right ball easier.
The 2026 Callaway Chrome Tour golf balls will be available for presale on January 6, 2026, with retail availability beginning Friday, January 30, 2026, at a price of $57.99 per dozen. For more details, visit callawaygolf.com, and be sure to join the conversation in the THP Forums.





[QUOTE=”0dom, post: 13779543, member: 46310″]
Here’s the durability on a sim into a net with the new Chrome Tour X. I have the SkyTrak+ so I have to face the logo towards the camera. That accounts for all the shot in a ring around the ball.
Since being back from the Grandaddy, I’ve hit approximately 1,000 shots on the sim. It’s way more do to misses and the shanks that I delete. And this ball has been used over 50% of those shots. So let’s say 500+ shots with this ball into a net.
Besides the paint coming off that axis and a small chunk here or there, the ball isn’t too bad.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”20260114_205741.jpg”]9404838[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”20260114_205759.jpg”]9404837[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full” alt=”20260114_205728.jpg”]9404839[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Very similar to what I am seeing hitting mine into a net with the MLM2 Pro, and since I added sticker dots to it, it gets impacted in the same spot repeatedly so I don’t tear off the dots.
Nets chew up golf balls, and then they get a bounce or two on concrete in my garage. I think they are holding up really well considering.
[QUOTE=”That post, post: 13780252, member: 65950″]
In my ball testing thread I’ve only tested two balls through my official protocol so far but it seems like I’m seeing just a little bit faster ball speeds with Mizuno Pro X. However, better and more consistent spin with CTX.
I actually prefer the higher and more consistent spin.
[/QUOTE]
I’ll definitely test this ball as well. Once I can find a place to get them.
[QUOTE=”That post, post: 13779920, member: 65950″]
Were you guys also using the new driver for that average gain? I’ve been trying to figure out why I haven’t seen it yet. I’ll keep testing but it’s continuing to fall in my same average range with driver and slower than some others off the irons. But like I said I’d perfer the extra spin (which I do see) over a hotter ball off the face.
[/QUOTE]
We were. Yet we used it for testing both balls.
We were but we used the new driver on both the competitor ball and the new ball.
We were also comparing a like ball to a like ball. Meaning an X style to an X style.
Yeah I'm even more flummoxed on why I'm not seeing it then. Definitely not for lack of trying. I'll give it another go tomorrow for my sim time.
But like I keep saying, I think I'd rather take the spin increase that I am seeing then a hotter ball off the face.
[QUOTE=”Coulter, post: 13775685, member: 84628″]
I like the standard triple track plenty but just something about seeing the 360 roll end over end is too satisfying
[/QUOTE]
Except when your putts don’t roll straight and you get a wobbly line haha
Nailed it
[QUOTE=”Lord Tox, post: 13782293, member: 5944″]
Except when your putts don’t roll straight and you get a wobbly line haha
[/QUOTE]
This is some glass half empty talk sir 🤣
Gotta play the game for those hero moments, they might only come once every other round but when it does happen… 🙌
[QUOTE=”That post, post: 13782290, member: 65950″]
Yeah I’m even more flummoxed on why I’m not seeing it then. Definitely not for lack of trying. I’ll give it another go tomorrow for my sim time.
But like I keep saying, I think I’d rather take the spin increase that I am seeing then a hotter ball off the face.
[/QUOTE]
Which two balls are you comparing and what did you play last year?
[QUOTE=”That post, post: 13780252, member: 65950″]
In my ball testing thread I’ve only tested two balls through my official protocol so far but it seems like I’m seeing just a little bit faster ball speeds with Mizuno Pro X. However, better and more consistent spin with CTX.
I actually prefer the higher and more consistent spin.
[/QUOTE]
I’m going to see if I still have any Mizuno Pro X laying around and compare because I don’t buy this at all. I’m not saying its not possible but I need to see it for myself
[QUOTE=”Lord Tox, post: 13782293, member: 5944″]
Except when your putts don’t roll straight and you get a wobbly line haha
[/QUOTE]
Excuse me, this is the internet where all putts go end over end.
[QUOTE=”Lord Tox, post: 13782318, member: 5944″]
I’m going to see if I still have any Mizuno Pro X laying around and compare because I don’t buy this at all. I’m not saying its not possible but I need to see it for myself
[/QUOTE]
Yeah that’s how I am too. I like to see stuff for myself when possible. That’s why I keep chasing this 2.7mph increase
[QUOTE=”That post, post: 13782325, member: 65950″]
Yeah that’s how I am too. I like to see stuff for myself when possible. That’s why I keep chasing this 2.7mph increase
[/QUOTE]
Its not going to be the same for everyone. Some see more some see less but I’ve not seen a ball be faster than this one in my testing
[QUOTE=”That post, post: 13782290, member: 65950″]
Yeah I’m even more flummoxed on why I’m not seeing it then. Definitely not for lack of trying. I’ll give it another go tomorrow for my sim time.
But like I keep saying, I think I’d rather take the spin increase that I am seeing then a hotter ball off the face.
[/QUOTE]
What type of sim are you on? If it’s radar based, the different finishes of the covers could be effecting the results.
[QUOTE=”Lord Tox, post: 13782318, member: 5944″]
I’m going to see if I still have any Mizuno Pro X laying around and compare because I don’t buy this at all. I’m not saying its not possible but I need to see it for myself
[/QUOTE]
I know we’ve both done this test numerous times, with pretty much every ball out there, typically there’s some impact location involved.
Testing golf balls for most people is tough when searching for a single metric. Less tough for you with the dime size mark you leave on a driver, but for lay people like me, it usually comes down to impact.
It’s why it was so unique to see a unanimous test again, because it’s happened less than five times in 18 years of doing this
[QUOTE=”That post, post: 13782325, member: 65950″]
Yeah that’s how I am too. I like to see stuff for myself when possible. That’s why I keep chasing this 2.7mph increase
[/QUOTE]
Remember the 2.7 was just the average for our team and we had one guy gain 5. I believe in Callaway’s full testing it was closer to 2 than 3.
[QUOTE=”amarkabove, post: 13782329, member: 75272″]
What type of sim are you on? If it’s radar based, the different finishes of the covers could be effecting the results.
[/QUOTE]
I don’t love doing this, but it’s easier this way here’s a copy paste from Gemini on how Trackman iO measures ball speed.
The Trackman iO measures ball speed through a hybrid technology called [B]Optically Enhanced Radar Tracking (OERT)[/B]. Unlike traditional launch monitors that often rely on just one method, the iO combines radar and high-speed imaging to ensure precision in indoor environments.
[HEADING=2]How It Works[/HEADING]
[LIST]
[/LIST]
[QUOTE=”hedley_lamarr, post: 13779898, member: 37622″]
The ball has taken a positive step in each direction in every category. Don’t forget….
Grandaddy crew tested and gained 2.7mph average over the “market leading” premium ball.
[/QUOTE]
Think that is a good point that I keep forgetting is its vs. a different “market leading” ball. Perhaps the gain may or may not be as much for some just going from ’24 to ’26, but I do believe its been an all around improvement/step forward in the ’26 model that I am seeing on the course. They’ve taken a great ball (CT in my instance) and made it even better.
as a former TD user this is pretty intriguing. I didn’t quite have enough speed to take advantage of the TD so this may be worth a shot.
The tour is lower spinning off irons right?
[QUOTE=”amarkabove, post: 13782339, member: 75272″]
Remember the 2.7 was just the average for our team and we had one guy gain 5. I believe in Callaway’s full testing it was closer to 2 than 3.
[/QUOTE]
I know there’s other variables at play, but to even see 5mph gain vs. a similar profile ball is also pretty wild in itself.
I know everyone loves distance, but the difference in dispersion and spin into and around the green I'm seeing (even over the '24 CTX) are what I'm excited about the most
Oh… yeah, that IS a good point and something I guess I keep skimming over too. Anyone care to disclose what the "market leading" ball was? Should we assume it was PV1?
[QUOTE=”KY Golfer, post: 13782364, member: 21072″]
I know everyone loves distance, but the difference in dispersion and spin into and around the green I’m seeing (even over the ’24 CTX) are what I’m excited about the most
[/QUOTE]
The consistency from shot to shot has been pretty impressive for sure.
[QUOTE=”KY Golfer, post: 13782364, member: 21072″]
I know everyone loves distance, but the difference in dispersion and spin into and around the green I’m seeing (even over the ’24 CTX) are what I’m excited about the most
[/QUOTE]
I’ve had more than a few people notice the amount of spin the ’26 CTX gets around the green. It’s almost insane to see a 3/4 swing take one hop and completely stop.
[QUOTE=”That post, post: 13782290, member: 65950″]
Yeah I’m even more flummoxed on why I’m not seeing it then. Definitely not for lack of trying. I’ll give it another go tomorrow for my sim time.
But like I keep saying, I think I’d rather take the spin increase that I am seeing then a hotter ball off the face.
[/QUOTE]
One thing I have noticed too is that even when ball speed against a competitor ball in my testing on the MLM2 is similar, the carry and total are longer with the CT and/or CTX. So even when ball speed and other metrics have been similar, I am still seeing more distance.
Yes I am too and I noted that in the big testing post I did in this thread earlier this week. Even with similar ball speed to what I always see I'm getting 5-7 yards more carry off driver specifically. It's pretty impressive. The ball is an efficiency monster.
In fact, even with slightly more ball speed with MPX I saw a bigger carry with CTX.
Also to note in the average CTX was faster by about 1mph but it never touched 160 like MPX did. As @JB noted that definitely could be a strike issue as there is a reason I play an Adapt Max K hahaha
[QUOTE=”That post, post: 13782430, member: 65950″]
Yes I am too and I noted that in the big testing post I did in this thread earlier this week. Even with similar ball speed to what I always see I’m getting 5-7 yards more carry off driver specifically. It’s pretty impressive. The ball is an efficiency monster.
[/QUOTE]
Yeah it really is crazy to see. I can’t wait to be able to get back out on a course.
[QUOTE=”That post, post: 13782430, member: 65950″]
Yes I am too and I noted that in the big testing post I did in this thread earlier this week. Even with similar ball speed to what I always see I’m getting 5-7 yards more carry off driver specifically. It’s pretty impressive. The ball is an efficiency monster.
In fact, even with slightly more ball speed with MPX I saw a bigger carry with CTX.
[/QUOTE]
That kind of efficiency is impressive.
so lets presume someone… has a sub-par swing, should hit further than they do based on clubhead speeds but struggles with dispersion also, existed…
for a while I was going to start with Chrome Soft and then try the CT.
But I am intrigued by some of the CTX talk.
Someone with a 7i, this was about a median swing
87.6 clubhead
114.2 ball speed
5276 spin
1.3 smash
-6.8 AoA
17.1 launc
92.9 peak height
165..4 carry
some of those I know what mean, some I don’t…2.8R spin axis right suggests to me I would fade and sure enough the Flightscope called it fade and it was 9.5R of target
based on stuff I saw earlier I had one thought but now I am wondering…I may end up trying all three but which would those of you whom have hit them think was the best start place and why? What do I look for?
[QUOTE=”amarkabove, post: 13782339, member: 75272″]
Remember the 2.7 was just the average for our team and we had one guy gain 5. I believe in Callaway’s full testing it was closer to 2 than 3.
[/QUOTE]
You rang?
[QUOTE=”THE BOV, post: 13782701, member: 41109″]
I did a ball fitting before the Goat Cup last year and it put me in the CT. I continue to use it as I had my best season ever last year using that ball. The 2026 balls are even better. I do find it curious though when I use the online ball fitting tool it always seems to recommend the Chrome Soft. I have a dozen of this year’s release from the GD and can’t wait to try them out.
[/QUOTE]
I wonder if I shouldn’t give the CS a try myself. I probably will at some point as well.
[QUOTE=”KY Golfer, post: 13782713, member: 21072″]
I wonder if I shouldn’t give the CS a try myself. I probably will at some point as well.
[/QUOTE]
We should try all 3 of course… for science and all.
[QUOTE=”THE BOV, post: 13782718, member: 41109″]
We should try all 3 of course… for science and all.
[/QUOTE]
Exactly right, I have plenty of time with the CT & CTX so it’s only right.
[QUOTE=”KY Golfer, post: 13782713, member: 21072″]
I wonder if I shouldn’t give the CS a try myself. I probably will at some point as well.
[/QUOTE]
The Chrome Soft is such a fun ball. I’ve only used it indoors, but it’s soft and goes high. Plenty far too
Your numbers are wildly similar to mine except that I’d sell my soul to launch my 7i 17° 🤣. I too don’t hit it as far as I should relative to SS. I’m in the CT and love it, but the CTX certainly could work.
Could argue maybe a touch more spin off the 7i could be beneficial. What was your descent angle?
I look forward to trying the new line. I have absolutely loved ChromeSoft forever but when at a lesson was told I needed more spin. I switched to some of the CT from last year during my practice session and my spin went up. I just have always loved the feel of CS and felt it was more forgiving than CT.
I will be getting a few sleeves of all the new balls to try. I have lots of CS/CT to use up, though.
[QUOTE=”oumagic, post: 13782955, member: 52535″]
I look forward to trying the new line. I have absolutely loved ChromeSoft forever but when at a lesson was told I needed more spin. I switched to some of the CT from last year during my practice session and my spin went up. I just have always loved the feel of CS and felt it was more forgiving than CT.
I will be getting a few sleeves of all the new balls to try. I have lots of CS/CT to use up, though.
[/QUOTE]
I have some Volviks, Maxflis, TP5s, and some Provs that may never see the light of day.
Believe me, I have dozens in the garage that will be given away. But not the older, premium Callaway balls.
CTX – I like it for you to add a little more 7 iron spin. Maybe a little peak height. Help with land angle since you appear to be lower spin like me.
[QUOTE=”LeftyGolferWI, post: 13782940, member: 77319″]
Your numbers are wildly similar to mine except that I’d sell my soul to launch my 7i 17° 🤣. I too don’t hit it as far as I should relative to SS. I’m in the CT and love it, but the CTX certainly could work.
Could argue maybe a touch more spin off the 7i could be beneficial. What was your descent angle?
[/QUOTE]
Not sure descent…numbers are off flightscope but I did not do the upgrade as until just a couple weeks ago I have had memberships at various simulators that had more robust stats.
Considering it for the club path/face stuff but have to make sure I can master target alignment first… I don’t post the groupings because often it takes 15 or 20 shots for me to figure out what target it picked…which never seems to be what I point it at lol.
User error 100% and a lot of wind to say…don’t have the descent parameter
I am playing on Sunday and I only have 1 CTX left! I need release day to get here stat so I can order.
I just got done testing another ball in the simulator but i decided to hit the CTX for my SIM round this morning.
I can say unequivocally that the CTX is the best feeling golf ball I've hit in 2026. And that's a huge for me.
Well, isn't that something… Just shot my best sim round ever with it.
I know I know … BUT..
This ball man. This ball..
[QUOTE=”That post, post: 13785063, member: 65950″]
Well, isn’t that something… Just shot my best sim round ever with it.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”24841.png”]9405311[/ATTACH]
I know I know … BUT..
[IMG]https://media4.giphy.com/media/Qz5qqMop4LGx5giOvp/200.gif[/IMG]
This ball man. This ball..
[/QUOTE]
Well done! Love to see it.
I hit up the simulator again over lunch today and once again, I saw more of the same.
Driver:
– With driver it was 1-2mph more ball speed over one of my previous gamers, the ProV1
– Compared to the TP5 it was usually 2-3mph more
– Spin hits that nice slot of 2,100-2,350 that I like to be in.
– Launch is slightly lower, but nothing major.
Irons:
– 1-2* lower launch than ProV1, closer to 2-3* than the TP5
– Spin was higher by a couple hundred RPM vs PV1, even more against the TP5. Roughly 300RPM.
– Feel off the iron face is perfection for me. Solid with some “give” to it and not clicky at all. It’s perfect!
Wedges:
– Again, slightly higher spin with maybe a touch lower launch and peak height
– Feel again is perfect for my preferences. Feel with wedges is a huge factor for me when deciding on a ball and this is right in my happy place.
This has been a really fun test so far because I feel like it really has shown improvements over what I have played the past year, including the previous Chrome Tour.
14 days…..
I have used the same ball now for over 350 shots in the simulator. The wedge work today finally made some real scuffs. If I can get that kind or durability and still NOT LOSE PERFORMANCE I cant see why I would ever change golf balls.
[QUOTE=”KEV, post: 13786348, member: 36767″]
I hit up the simulator again over lunch today and once again, I saw more of the same.
Driver:
– With driver it was 1-2mph more ball speed over one of my previous gamers, the ProV1
– Compared to the TP5 it was usually 2-3mph more
– Spin hits that nice slot of 2,100-2,350 that I like to be in.
– Launch is slightly lower, but nothing major.
Irons:
– 1-2* lower launch than ProV1, closer to 2-3* than the TP5
– Spin was higher by a couple hundred RPM vs PV1, even more against the TP5. Roughly 300RPM.
– Feel off the iron face is perfection for me. Solid with some “give” to it and not clicky at all. It’s perfect!
Wedges:
– Again, slightly higher spin with maybe a touch lower launch and peak height
– Feel again is perfect for my preferences. Feel with wedges is a huge factor for me when deciding on a ball and this is right in my happy place.
This has been a really fun test so far because I feel like it really has shown improvements over what I have played the past year, including the previous Chrome Tour.
[/QUOTE]
Its a damn good ball
[QUOTE=”Tevenor, post: 13786469, member: 55541″]
14 days…..
[/QUOTE]
I’ll get me a few dozen stashed away on launch
Have been getting putting practice in with the CT. The test balls are just the plain white which I actually haven’t played in a while. Excited to try the CT with alignment aids when they’re available.
In terms of the feel of the ball when putting, I really like where CT sits. I think paired with the softer insert on the S2S tri hot that I’m gaming now is a fantastic combo. The CT actually feels a touch softer off the putter than off my irons (not that they’re super firm off irons), which I like.
I believe Jason Finley has mentioned before to try testing a new ball starting from the green and working backwards. Feel is the big one for me on the greens with the putter and the CT is checking the box for me.