As always, the Qi4D driver release for TaylorMade will get the majority of the initial attention, but as a brand, they are quick to remind everyone that they have also been a leader on Tour for well over a decade now when it comes to fairway woods and Rescues. In fact, though the Qi35 may not have met expectations as far as the driver was concerned, the rest of the lineup saw a huge jump in play during the 2025 cycle.
With that in mind, TaylorMade knew that although the drivers were set to undergo a significant metamorphosis design-wise, the fairways and rescues only needed tweaks as opposed to wholesale changes. Some may call such decisions playing it safe, but the reality is, sometimes little changes can make the most impact when riding a wave of success.
2026 TaylorMade Qi4D Fairway Woods

The most prominent wording that TaylorMade is using to discuss the new Qi4D fairways is “Proven Recipe,” and it makes a ton of sense. The name of the game here remains technology and speed, and within that, the core design attributes remain. The Speed Pocket is alive and well in all the models, though it is slightly more elongated to the toe this time around. Similarly, Twist Face lives on, as does the infinity carbon crown design, which makes for an authentically TaylorMade look.
While this article will certainly get into the unique changes for each model, there are a couple of overarching evolutions worth noting on their own. First, all of the fairway models now feature a flatter standard lie angle. This was done via feedback from Tour as well as their fitters at The Kingdom in order to improve overall playability, and make the 4-degree (+/- 2 degree) loft sleeve even more effective. Also, the fairways will feature a new REAX shaft design created in tandem with Mitsubishi Chemical’s material expertise alongside TaylorMade’s massive data archives.
QiD4 Fairway

The Qi4D Fairway constitutes the “core” option within the family of fairway woods, and it will no doubt be the most popular of the three. The elongated Speed Pocket design helps keep spin more consistent while still maximizing speed potential, and the head features a C300 face to take it even further. Every loft is not only CG optimized, but also now all use loft sleeves to maximize fit potential. This head sits between the other two in size (3W is 185cc) and brings confidence both from the tee as well as the grass.


Standard shaft pairing for the Qi4D is the REAX FW 65 (X, S) and 55 (R, A). It will be offered in 3 (15), 3HL (16.5), 5 (18), 7 (21), and 9 (24) wood loft options.
Qi4D Max Fairway
When it comes to maximizing forgiveness, the Qi4D Max Fairway seeks to check that box well with its notably larger overall footprint and more shallow face depth. In fact, this one is 17% larger than the Tour model, with the 3W coming in at 200cc.


Meanwhile, it still features all of the technology as its siblings, including the reshaped Speed Pocket and Twist Face, while adding in a single rear TAS weight for more fine tuning. The Max is built to maximize launch and inspire confidence, and at this footprint, it should do both. It is offered in 3W (15), 5W (18), 7W (21), as well as 9W (24), with the 3 and 5 featuring the brand’s adjustable loft sleeve.
The fairways will be paired with a REAX FW 55 (S, R, A) shaft as standard. There will also be a Max Lite version available as well.
Qi4D Tour Fairway

Not only does the Qi4D Tour remain the most compact of the three models, it has also undergone the most significant change. The 3W remains 170cc with its Tour-driven shaping and aggressive footprint while also featuring the same Twist Face as well as Speed Pocket tech as its siblings.
However, TaylorMade found that people either didn’t understand their various enhanced weight adjustment systems in past Tour models or just didn’t use them. So, the Qi4D Tour moves to a three–TAS weight system (two forward, one back) while keeping 65g of tungsten forward in the clubhead as well.


The 3W (15), 5W (18), and 7W (21) all feature an adjustable loft sleeve and are paired with the REAX 75 (X, S) and 65 (R) as standard options.
2026 TaylorMade Qi4D Rescues

Annually, the Rescue options from TaylorMade remain very business-like in their design principles and placement within the lineup. While we have seen tweaks over the years as far as the family goes, they definitely still stay true to their roots of functioning as standalone clubs as well as blending into the core model irons which the brand produces. This year specifically, it was all about cleaning things up, both in visuals and performance.
Qi4D Max Rescue
It should surprise no one that the Qi4D Max Rescue is built to be the most playable. It keeps the multi-material construction, which allows a deeper and more strategically placed CG location that blends well with the more friendly overall shaping/footprint.

This year, there is a single TAS weight (8g) at the rear of the club, which will allow more fine tuning, though all models of the Max will be bonded.

The Qi4D Max is being offered in 3 (20), 4 (23), 5 (26), 6 (30), and even a 7 (34) to maximize their iron replacement potential, though the two highest lofts will be RH only. Each will be paired at standard with a REAX HL 50 (S, R, A) shaft.
As was the case with the fairways, the Max Rescues will also be available in a Qi4D Max Lite version for those seeking out ways to maximize ease and swing speed.
Qi4D Rescue

On the other hand, we have the Qi4D Rescue. Given that there is no Tour model this year, the footprint here is one that will appeal to a broad range of golfers, as it is noticeably more compact than the Max.

This model not only features a 450 stainless face, but also a carbon fiber crown as well as a single forward TAS weight (8g). The goal was also a more balanced look, so gone is the T alignment emblem, and in its place is a single “dash,” which should get some interesting feedback.
TaylorMade is producing the Qi4D Rescue in 2 (17), 3 (19), 4 (22), and 5 (25) loft options. All four models feature their loft sleeve system and will be paired with a REAX 85X, 75S, 65R, or 55A shaft.
The Details
Will TaylorMade be able to capitalize on their momentum in fairway woods from 2025 while finding new footholds in hybrids with their trademark Rescue options? Time will tell, but what we do know is that there is clean and straightforward refinement here which certainly doesn’t take unnecessary risks.
All of the Rescue models will be priced at $299.99, while the fairways sit at $379.99 for Qi4D core and Max options. The Qi4D Tour fairway comes in at $449.99. Pre-orders begin 1/8/26, with product at retail 1/29/26.
For more information, check out www.TaylorMadeGolf.com





Great write up [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]
These look very much like TM fairway woods. Unfortunately for me, that has meant hard to hit in the past. I do like the ditching of the weight track.
And I’m very curious about this REAX shaft.
The Tour fairway is much improved in looks. TM usually solid in this area and no reason to believe that will change.
The rescues will be excellent yet people will be brainwashed to order from the 4 letter word as per usual.
I think the rescues might be my favorite out of everything from the 4D line. They look great, and I dig how they sit at address.
I always dig the Tour fairways. I seem to get along better with the smaller profile.
This is an area where Taylormade always seems to be really strong.
Great article, [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]
Sitting at work eating popcorn and thought I’d look at the headcover. The biggest improvement in this lineup is the head cover. No more Jiffy Pop cover.
Will order core 9wd on day one –
Which is todayView attachment 9403385
Great article [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] . I need to hit their fairways this year, they got a lot if love in 25’ and they look even better in 2026.
I need to settle the top end of my bag this year and I really need to give these a shot
These look and sound good. The Max version making them easier to hit and launch could be great for a lot of golfers. It’s also nice to see that they get up there in lofts as well for iron replacements. [USER=42778]@Lougle[/USER] is going to love that they have a 9W in case his old faithful breaks down.
I want to see someone put the Max 3W against the 15-degree R7 mini. I know it’s not an apples-to-apples comparison, but I still want to see it.
Another great writeup [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] – I really like the look of these, especially the Tour. I could see these being a big hit on the Tour and with better players pretty quickly.
Still want to learn more about this shaft though – seems like they are def going all-in on this approach.
Nice write up [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] it makes sense with the success of their 25 Fairway woods that they would settle on some tweaks instead of wholesale changes. The fairway woods look nice, and you know i’m a huge fan of the higher lofted fairway woods.
a little bummed the core fairway model went flatter. TM tended to be more upright than others making it historically a good fit for me. Their adaptor shifts it more upright which helps but always gave their stuff one of my first looks due to that historical more upright piece.
@Jman The Reax shaft in the Drivers are engineered with Mitsubishi Chemical. The Reax shafts in the Irons are made by KBS. Do we know who makes the Reax fairway shafts and is Taylormade focusing on rotation instead for launch for the fairway and hybrid shafts as well?
Edit: The Taylormade website has the wood and hybrid shafts as Mitsubishi Chemical, so did the article if I read more carefully….sorry @Jman
[QUOTE=”amarkabove, post: 13755613, member: 75272″]
Great write up [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]
These look very much like TM fairway woods. Unfortunately for me, that has meant hard to hit in the past. I do like the ditching of the weight track.
And I’m very curious about this REAX shaft.
[/QUOTE]
For the fairway the REAX Is created with the same data points in collab with Mitsubishi, but without the multiple release options, it’s more a hit the biggest part of the. ELL curve one compared to driver.
The last few generations of drivers have been love/hate for me, but TaylorMade fairways have been on a strong run, so I hope that success continues.
I have always thought TaylorMade fairways and rescues performed really well. Have always liked the looks too.
[QUOTE=”JimmyDee, post: 13755662, member: 16050″]
Great article [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] . I need to hit their fairways this year, they got a lot if love in 25’ and they look even better in 2026.
[/QUOTE]
It’s pretty smart of them to just keep riding that wave to an extent, their fairways have been towards top of class for so long now.
The core 7W is on my try list this year for sure, I heard and saw enough last year from the 35 fairways in that high lift spot that my curiosity is real
Some great options
I’m intrigued by these for sure. Seeing how quick a lot of the tour staff adopted these FWs caught my attention since FWs are usually the slowest to find their way into bags.
Great write up [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]
[USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] can you explain this a bit more?
[I]TaylorMade found that people either didn’t understand their various enhanced weight adjustment systems in past Tour models or just didn’t use them.[/I]
[QUOTE=”Lord Tox, post: 13756184, member: 5944″]
[USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] can you explain this a bit more?
[I]TaylorMade found that people either didn’t understand their various enhanced weight adjustment systems in past Tour models or just didn’t use them.[/I]
[/QUOTE]
Absolutely.
It’s pertaining specifically to the Tour/LS Fairways, which for the past several years (a LOT of years actually, all the way back to M1 Tour a decade ago, my god I’m getting old) had movable or shiftable weights.
Some like the M1 were a simple slider right to left in the head, but others got WAY more complicated. To the point that while they moved a ton of weight (usually tungsten) and had significant impacts on CG/Spin/Speed, it was overwhelming to mess with and intimidated people imo.
So the move back to their TAS weights at the perimeter keeps tuning simple, while imbedding tungsten internally forward gets that CG forward where they want the tour model.
That was a lot, I hope it reads ok, I’ve had no caffeine hahaha
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13756211, member: 1579″]
Absolutely.
It’s pertaining specifically to the Tour/LS Fairways, which for the past several years (a LOT of years actually, all the way back to M1 Tour a decade ago, my god I’m getting old) had movable or shiftable weights.
Some like the M1 were a simple slider right to left in the head, but others got WAY more complicated. To the point that while they moved a ton of weight (usually tungsten) and had significant impacts on CG/Spin/Speed, it was overwhelming to mess with and intimidated people imo.
So the move back to their TAS weights at the perimeter keeps tuning simple, while imbedding tungsten internally forward gets that CG forward where they want the tour model.
That was a lot, I hope it reads ok, I’ve had no caffeine hahaha
[/QUOTE]
I personally love the TAS weights, its simple and makes sense. I was just curious why nobody used the previous versions. This is a much cleaner look IMO anyway, especially on a fairway
[QUOTE=”Lord Tox, post: 13756220, member: 5944″]
I personally love the TAS weights, its simple and makes sense. I was just curious why nobody used the previous versions. This is a much cleaner look IMO anyway, especially on a fairway
[/QUOTE]
Yeah, I’m the same way. I’ve always thought it hey were simple and easy.
I think it’s really driven by their Tour Feedback as well as their fitters that it’s been underused, so why not save pain on their design end and simplify with a system that is easier too.
Personally, I also like that no more sliding parts means no more dirt/junk being imbedded in those spots haha
I like these. I heard from a lot of places that the QI35 fairways were excellent, and glad Taylormade just went with the tweak option.
I noted that you said there is use of adapters across the line. I assume that means the 7W and 9W too, correct? I love that if so. I wish every OEM did that.
[QUOTE=”JTinMO, post: 13756237, member: 68067″]
I like these. I heard from a lot of places that the QI35 fairways were excellent, and glad Taylormade just went with the tweak option.
I noted that you said there is use of adapters across the line. I assume that means the 7W and 9W too, correct? I love that if so. I wish every OEM did that.
[/QUOTE]
Yep, it was a move they made this year on the fairways. I like it too.
Well, core and Tour at least, in the Max the 7/9 are bonded, and I believe all max lite are bonded.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13756211, member: 1579″]
Absolutely.
It’s pertaining specifically to the Tour/LS Fairways, which for the past several years (a LOT of years actually, all the way back to M1 Tour a decade ago, my god I’m getting old) had movable or shiftable weights.
Some like the M1 were a simple slider right to left in the head, but others got WAY more complicated. To the point that while they moved a ton of weight (usually tungsten) and had significant impacts on CG/Spin/Speed, it was overwhelming to mess with and intimidated people imo.
So the move back to their TAS weights at the perimeter keeps tuning simple, while imbedding tungsten internally forward gets that CG forward where they want the tour model.
That was a lot, I hope it reads ok, I’ve had no caffeine hahaha
[/QUOTE]
This new system will also be a lot easier to get the turf out of I imagine. I could never get that front to back weight track cleaned.
Who makes the REAX Shafts for TM?
[QUOTE=”El Rayo X, post: 13756437, member: 12075″]
Who makes the REAX Shafts for TM?
[/QUOTE]
Mitsubishi in driver and fairways, KBS in Rescues
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13756453, member: 1579″]
Mitsubishi in driver and fairways, KBS in Rescues
[/QUOTE]
Oh that’s weird to have two different OEMs making shafts with the same name.
[QUOTE=”amarkabove, post: 13756478, member: 75272″]
Oh that’s weird to have two different OEMs making shafts with the same name.
[/QUOTE]
Eh, yes and no? Not the first time it’s happened, and the Rescue is a bit of the stepchild anyway.
The fairways look really good. Would be interested in seeing those and the hybrids.
While the new fairways/hybrids look great, I’m very skeptical that they would be of any sort of significant improvement over the QI10’s. I have the tours in both, and while there is no tour rescue, even the core is very similar.
I wouldn’t pass an overall judgement without trying, but just remain skeptical. The Qi10’s were just sooooo good. That goes for the driver as well, but the Qi4d driver could be my new gamer. Time and price will tell, but mostly price.
Good looking clubs
[MEDIA=youtube]Qjluyho8Hd8[/MEDIA]
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13756506, member: 1579″]
Eh, yes and no? Not the first time it’s happened, and the Rescue is a bit of the stepchild anyway.
[/QUOTE]
It is and it shouldn’t be. This is one part of the bag TM does very very well
Haven’t even given these a look yet but I will be curious. The Qi35 3W and 5W were great for me. I always considered a 7W. Not sure if they are in the cards for me this year or will gap better for me than my 3W/5W combo did into the 4h.
I do like that it looks like the 7W is now adustable since I recall it was bonded last year.
[QUOTE=”Daluteh, post: 13755671, member: 59803″]
These look and sound good. The Max version making them easier to hit and launch could be great for a lot of golfers. It’s also nice to see that they get up there in lofts as well for iron replacements. [USER=42778]@Lougle[/USER] is going to love that they have a 9W in case his old faithful breaks down.
[/QUOTE]
Remember kids-if you want 7 woods and 9 woods in flexes that are not regular or stiff, BUY IMMEDIATELY!
Whenever people come to me in October looking for an XS 7 wood, it’s game over.
[QUOTE=”Lougle, post: 13761667, member: 42778″]
Remember kids-if you want 7 woods and 9 woods in flexes that are not regular or stiff, BUY IMMEDIATELY!
Whenever people come to me in October looking for an XS 7 wood, it’s game over.
[/QUOTE]
Its a hilariously vicious cycle hahahaha
[QUOTE=”Lougle, post: 13761667, member: 42778″]
Remember kids-if you want 7 woods and 9 woods in flexes that are not regular or stiff, BUY IMMEDIATELY!
Whenever people come to me in October looking for an XS 7 wood, it’s game over.
[/QUOTE]
Not regular or stiff …. so senior flex – heard. I hear the underlying old person joke in your comment sir!
The fairways MIGHT make my RBZ 17* fairway a tad bit nervous. I like the crown color better on these than the gray on the 35s.
Was looking at the shafts in the components book and came upon this. I really like the comparison and visualization of the overlap between Woods, Rescues, and Irons:
[ATTACH type=”full”]9403753[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”Daluteh, post: 13761803, member: 59803″]
Not regular or stiff …. so senior flex – heard. I hear the underlying old person joke in your comment sir!
[/QUOTE]
It wasn’t really a burn on senior flexers like yourself. Rather, the manufacturers tend to build those high lofted woods for stock purposes in the softer flexes to cover the proper market. What inherently happens is the rest of the golf world realizes the tour pros are using 7 woods and they want them in stiff and regular. Which were barely in stock to begin with. Then come end of summer they are out of heads for custom and BOOM, no one can get them.
Got to see a core 7w today, holy crap it’s gorgeous.