Golf courses have never looked better. Fairways are striped, greens are smooth, bunkers are freshly raked and golfers have come to expect consistent conditions almost everywhere they play.
But are golf courses too easy?
On Episode 10 of Splitting Fairways, Hawk and Jeremy debate whether modern golf courses do enough to punish bad shots and, more importantly, where that punishment should actually come from.
The conversation starts with bunkers. For better players, a perfectly maintained bunker can sometimes be preferable to thick greenside rough. Would footprints, buried lies and inconsistent sand make them more of a true hazard, or simply introduce unnecessary randomness into the game?
Then there is rough. Growing it seems like an easy way to punish inaccurate shots, particularly at the professional level. For everyday golfers, however, thicker rough can mean more lost balls, longer searches and slower rounds.
That leads to another question: Should professional golfers face different consequences than the rest of us? Tour players have the speed and skill to recover from difficult situations, not to mention galleries, volunteers and spotters helping locate wayward shots.
Ultimately, the debate comes down to the difference between interesting difficulty and annoying difficulty. Firm surfaces, contours, strategic bunkering and angles can make golfers think their way around a course. Losing a ball barely off the fairway or hacking out of impossibly thick rough might just make golf more frustrating.
So, are golf courses too easy? Or is pristine conditioning exactly what golfers should expect?
What do you think? Are modern golf courses too manicured, or are consistent conditions exactly what golfers should expect? Check out Episode 10 of Splitting Fairways for the full debate.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download