Could a company that doesn’t produce golf balls enter the ball fitting world? The answer is yes and it will begin shortly. PING is set to launch something they are calling Ballnamic and golfers will have the ability to be fit at their fittings (as well as online) and for a fee get information.

The website is setup and you can find it at www.ballfitting.com and while not a ton exists on their parameters, it appears on the surface to be quite in depth. We are told from someone that has gone through Ballnamic already, that it is well done.
Do you trust a company to offer “better” information if they do not have skin in the game with their own product? With recommending other companies will some loyalists decide to possibly try that other brand’s equipment as well, perhaps finding more technology or a better fit in a driver for instance? Only time will tell on the latter of course, but it is an interesting idea and at THP we are all for more information to the golfer.
We expect the roll out of this service to be coming very soon and we will be following up here as golfers get a chance to go through it!







Alright and just like that I have run a new fitting. Top 5 results:
1. Srixon XV (94.6%)
2. TaylorMade TP5 (94.5%)
3. Srixon Z Star Diamond (94.5%)
4. OnCore Vero X2 (92.7%)
5. Maxfli Tour X (92.2%)
I haven’t hit any of the top 4 recommendations. Have limited experience with Srixon and TaylorMade balls and I don’t think I’ve ever even seen an OnCore ball in the wild. Sounds like I’ve got some research to do.
I did it a couple years ago, still have the results. If anything it confirmed what I was already thinking. It recommended the Z-Diamond and my regular Z as #2 option. Nothing surprising.
Current ball: Maxfli Tour X
Used Skytrak launch and spin data from the last week or two averaged out with obvious outliers removed.
1. Wilson Staff Model X – 96.3%
2. Callaway Chrome Tour – 95.1%
3. Bridgestone BX – 93.9%
4. Mizuno Pro X – 93.8%
5. Maxfli Tour X – 89.8%
Have not tried this year’s Chrome Tour, but had issues keeping it in the air off the tee with the prior model but Ballnamic does predict it to be my longest with irons (by 1 yard) and least side spin on irons (27 workability score out of 100 with the others all over 50).
Staff Model X and BX I have played a few holes each so far recently. I think I prefer the feel of the BX overall between the two. Never have tried the Mizuno ball.
I actually had TWO free codes, so I ran it again but told it I didn’t care about fliers, and wanted a soft ball. That one came back with the normal Wilson Staff Model as a 96.7% fit and Staff Model X as 2nd at 94.5%. My current Maxfli Tour X stayed in 5th place but changed to a 90.2% match, up slightly.
Comparing results, it looks like I get slightly better driver performance from the X and slightly better iron performance from the standard in the Wilson, but it is only about 1 yard difference so feel and short game probably a personal preference differentiator for me there.
Always fun to play with.
Need to spend more time with the Staff Model X and BX, I think overall I like those two the best after playing about 9 holes with each.
WELCOME10 promo code for $10 off.
FATHERS40 promo code gets you 40% today only 6/21/26 (I think the only catch is you have to buy 3 or 5 fittings) but $18 for 3 and $24 for 5 is a deal.
I see they are also doing wait list for their tour wind calculator tools. 💨👀
[QUOTE=”PiratePenguin, post: 14145217, member: 2635″]
I see they are also doing wait list for their tour wind calculator tools. 💨👀
[/QUOTE]
Yeah I noticed that. Interesting.
I did my hitting today and it recommended the Maxfli Tour as my #1 fit. Interesting