Could a company that doesn’t produce golf balls enter the ball fitting world? The answer is yes and it will begin shortly. PING is set to launch something they are calling Ballnamic and golfers will have the ability to be fit at their fittings (as well as online) and for a fee get information.

The website is setup and you can find it at www.ballfitting.com and while not a ton exists on their parameters, it appears on the surface to be quite in depth. We are told from someone that has gone through Ballnamic already, that it is well done.
Do you trust a company to offer “better” information if they do not have skin in the game with their own product? With recommending other companies will some loyalists decide to possibly try that other brand’s equipment as well, perhaps finding more technology or a better fit in a driver for instance? Only time will tell on the latter of course, but it is an interesting idea and at THP we are all for more information to the golfer.
We expect the roll out of this service to be coming very soon and we will be following up here as golfers get a chance to go through it!







[QUOTE=”erock9174, post: 12246892, member: 7797″]
I forgot. Can you just add 7i data or do you need driver numbers too ?
[/QUOTE]
It wants driver info as well
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12246901, member: 1579″]
It wants driver info as well
[/QUOTE]
But you can also use generic preferences not just launch numbers.
[QUOTE=”PiratePenguin, post: 12246911, member: 2635″]
But you can also use generic preferences not just launch numbers.
[/QUOTE]
Correct. And generic for one, and data for the other
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12246901, member: 1579″]
It wants driver info as well
[/QUOTE]
Shoot. I just got 7i numbers but Gotta wait for my 430 10k to come in later this week.
[QUOTE=”erock9174, post: 12246988, member: 7797″]
Shoot. I just got 7i numbers but Gotta wait for my 430 10k to come in later this week.
[/QUOTE]
You can put generic info in for driver if you want, it has two options, data, or generic questions to answer.
That said, my results were much more in line with real data for both.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12246992, member: 1579″]
You can put generic info in for driver if you want, it has two options, data, or generic questions to answer.
That said, my results were much more in line with real data for both.
[/QUOTE]
I can wait on real data. I forgot I just bought 4 dozen v1x’s anyway lol so I won’t be needing balls for a while.
[QUOTE=”erock9174, post: 12247022, member: 7797″]
I can wait on real data. I forgot I just bought 4 dozen v1x’s anyway lol so I won’t be needing balls for a while.
[/QUOTE]
Hahaha, you’re an internet golfer, we know better.
Says I who had just bought 10 dozen and proceeded to buy 3 of the one that it picked for me right after. ?
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12247029, member: 1579″]
Hahaha, you’re an internet golfer, we know better.
Says I who had just bought 10 dozen and proceeded to buy 3 of the one that it picked for me right after. ?
[/QUOTE]
It would take me years to go through 13 dozen. I typical buy around 2-3 dozen gamer balls and then another 2-3 dozen of spring and fall balls.
[QUOTE=”erock9174, post: 12247154, member: 7797″]
It would take me years to go through 13 dozen. I typical buy around 2-3 dozen gamer balls and then another 2-3 dozen of spring and fall balls.
[/QUOTE]
I play a wee bit of golf. Hahahaha!
Bought some Chrome Tour and ProV1s to try based on my last fitting
[ATTACH type=”full”]9254549[/ATTACH]Alright then Ballnamic. Let’s see it.
[QUOTE=”LLIB, post: 12252840, member: 50911″]
I might have to try the Chrome Tour and see how it stacks up.
[/QUOTE]
I seriously doubt you regret it. Great ball.
Well, I had some fun with PW’s when I was practicing…each set is the average from 5 shots.
Will do 8, 6, UW, and DR eventually too.
[TABLE]
[TR]
[TH][CENTER]BALL[/CENTER][/TH]
[TH][CENTER]BALL SPEED[/CENTER][/TH]
[TH][CENTER]LAUNCH ANGLE[/CENTER][/TH]
[TH][CENTER]SPIN[/CENTER][/TH]
[TH][CENTER]CARRY[/CENTER][/TH]
[TH][CENTER]TOTAL[/CENTER][/TH]
[TH][CENTER]DESCENT ANGLE[/CENTER][/TH]
[TH][CENTER]PEAK HEIGHT[/CENTER][/TH]
[TH][CENTER]CLUB SPEED[/CENTER][/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][CENTER]Staff Model[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]112[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]24[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]8727[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]144[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]144[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]52[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]36Y[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]84[/CENTER][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][CENTER]Honma[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]109[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]25[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]8853[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]139[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]139[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]51[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]36Y[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]85[/CENTER][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][CENTER]Tour B X[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]109[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]23[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]8242[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]142[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]143[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]53[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]33Y[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]85[/CENTER][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][CENTER]Chrome Tour[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]111[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]25[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]8661[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]142[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]143[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]53[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]37Y[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]84[/CENTER][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12254974, member: 1579″]
Well, I had some fun with PW’s when I was practicing…each set is the average from 5 shots.
Will do 8, 6, UW, and DR eventually too.
[TABLE]
[TR]
[TH][CENTER]BALL[/CENTER][/TH]
[TH][CENTER]BALL SPEED[/CENTER][/TH]
[TH][CENTER]LAUNCH ANGLE[/CENTER][/TH]
[TH][CENTER]SPIN[/CENTER][/TH]
[TH][CENTER]CARRY[/CENTER][/TH]
[TH][CENTER]TOTAL[/CENTER][/TH]
[TH][CENTER]DESCENT ANGLE[/CENTER][/TH]
[TH][CENTER]PEAK HEIGHT[/CENTER][/TH]
[TH][CENTER]CLUB SPEED[/CENTER][/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][CENTER]Staff Model[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]112[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]24[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]8727[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]144[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]144[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]52[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]36Y[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]84[/CENTER][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][CENTER]Honma[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]109[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]25[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]8853[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]139[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]139[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]51[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]36Y[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]85[/CENTER][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][CENTER]Tour B X[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]109[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]23[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]8242[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]142[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]143[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]53[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]33Y[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]85[/CENTER][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][CENTER]Chrome Tour[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]111[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]25[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]8661[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]142[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]143[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]53[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]37Y[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]84[/CENTER][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/QUOTE]
Good stuff. Those are great 7i numbers for me carry wise. ?
[QUOTE=”erock9174, post: 12255430, member: 7797″]
Good stuff. Those are great 7i numbers for me carry wise. ?
[/QUOTE]
Except my 7 iron that distance doesn’t stop on a dime. ?
[QUOTE=”LLIB, post: 12252840, member: 50911″]
Ok, I got my actual numbers today and plugged them in. The recommendations when I put in the vague information were-
1. AVX
2. Callaway Chrome Tour
3. Pro V1x
4. V1x Left Dash
5. LA Golf
The recommendations with my actual numbers were-
1. Chrome Tour
2. Srixon Q Star Tour
3. Pro V1x
4. Wilson Triad
5. Pro V1x Left Dash
Kind of all over the place with my actual numbers. I’ve been playing the Left Dash for awhile and it’s been a good fit. I do not like the Q star tour. I might have to try the Chrome Tour and see how it stacks up.
[/QUOTE]
Definitely all over the place! That is an odd mix of low spin balls and some high spin balls.
Won a box of Wilson Triads last year at an event and they spun way too much for me. Gave half of them away.
The AVX flies too low and doesn’t spin enough for me. Good in the wind or playing links style courses.
[QUOTE=”PiratePenguin, post: 12255485, member: 2635″]
Except my 7 iron that distance doesn’t stop on a dime. ?
[/QUOTE]
Same
[IMG alt=”sorry not sorry GIF”]https://media4.giphy.com/media/r0tGmQTClFyms/200.gif[/IMG]
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12254974, member: 1579″]
Well, I had some fun with PW’s when I was practicing…each set is the average from 5 shots.
Will do 8, 6, UW, and DR eventually too.
[TABLE]
[TR]
[TH][CENTER]BALL[/CENTER][/TH]
[TH][CENTER]BALL SPEED[/CENTER][/TH]
[TH][CENTER]LAUNCH ANGLE[/CENTER][/TH]
[TH][CENTER]SPIN[/CENTER][/TH]
[TH][CENTER]CARRY[/CENTER][/TH]
[TH][CENTER]TOTAL[/CENTER][/TH]
[TH][CENTER]DESCENT ANGLE[/CENTER][/TH]
[TH][CENTER]PEAK HEIGHT[/CENTER][/TH]
[TH][CENTER]CLUB SPEED[/CENTER][/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][CENTER]Staff Model[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]112[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]24[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]8727[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]144[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]144[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]52[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]36Y[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]84[/CENTER][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][CENTER]Honma[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]109[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]25[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]8853[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]139[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]139[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]51[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]36Y[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]85[/CENTER][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][CENTER]Tour B X[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]109[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]23[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]8242[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]142[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]143[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]53[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]33Y[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]85[/CENTER][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][CENTER]Chrome Tour[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]111[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]25[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]8661[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]142[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]143[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]53[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]37Y[/CENTER][/TD]
[TD][CENTER]84[/CENTER][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/QUOTE]
Curious to see the rest of the clubs with the Staff Model as that keeps popping up for me
Does anybody know what higher compression ball has the lowest workability score (straighest) on Ballnamic? I’ve seen Q star and Bridgestone RX very low but they are too low compression for me. I’m looking for a fast ball that’s also super straight, and good in the wind.
I’ve been meaning to try this out. These were my results.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9256840[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full”]9256841[/ATTACH]
Wilson staff ball is getting so many reccos from Ballnamic it seems like. I was very perplexed when I ended up getting the recco for it last month. I did try it out and they aren’t lying about it being HIGH SPIN.. I didn’t get it on a monitor yet but I could tell on course that it was spinning like the devil when I started ballooning irons. I ended up trading the 3 remaining sleeves to a guy at the club for some TP5’s he didn’t like.
I’m out of Ballnamic instances (I think 4 total) so I’ll need to re-up again soon.
Well, the Staff Model that was way up there for me
Is indeed a really dang good ball.
Very interesting. Food for thought.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9258456[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full”]9258458[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”Parrot, post: 12289188, member: 48815″]
Very interesting. Food for thought.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1713473218949.png”]9258456[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1713473395504.png”]9258458[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
I’m always shocked when it spits out that LA Golf ball
[QUOTE=”Parrot, post: 12289188, member: 48815″]
Very interesting. Food for thought.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1713473218949.png”]9258456[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1713473395504.png”]9258458[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
I thought I remembered reading that you are already gaming the BX? Am I mistaken or did something change and your in TP5 now?
[QUOTE=”Parrot, post: 12289188, member: 48815″]
Very interesting. Food for thought.
[/QUOTE]
The Chrome Tour and Tour B X keep showing up in fittings for me as well. Later in the season I’ll pick up a sleeve to test.
LA Golf shows up as well, but at $69 a dozen I’m out.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12289075, member: 1579″]
Well, the Staff Model that was way up there for me
Is indeed a really dang good ball.
[/QUOTE]
It’s impressive. The way they keep a softer feel with good iron distance is really special
[QUOTE=”GoodGriefMan, post: 12289215, member: 78611″]
It’s impressive. The way they keep a softer feel with good iron distance is really special
[/QUOTE]
It’s one I’d definitely like to get some data on. They’re just such a trip as a company, it makes it hard to commit to acquiring some
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12289209, member: 1579″]
I’m always shocked when it spits out that LA Golf ball
[/QUOTE]
It’s not a ball I’ve ever considered. $55/dz is enough for me.
[QUOTE=”That post, post: 12289210, member: 65950″]
I thought I remembered reading that you are already gaming the BX? Am I mistaken or did something change and your in TP5 now?
[/QUOTE]
I tried it and liked it, particularly in windy conditions. I preferred the slightly softer feel and higher greenside spin I saw from the TP5 and B XS (gamer for the most part of 3 years). The TP5 gave me a little more distance than the B XS and flew a bit lower. The BX was a bit longer than the TP5.
[QUOTE=”Parrot, post: 12289269, member: 48815″]
It’s not a ball I’ve ever considered. $55/dz is enough for me.
I tried it and liked it, particularly in windy conditions. I preferred the slightly softer feel and higher greenside spin I saw from the TP5 and B XS (gamer for the most part of 3 years). The TP5 gave me a little more a little more distance than the B XS and flew a bit lower. The BX was a bit longer than the TP5.
[/QUOTE]
Yep, the price is….oof.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12289221, member: 1579″]
It’s one I’d definitely like to get some data on. They’re just such a trip as a company, it makes it hard to commit to acquiring some
[/QUOTE]
I consider committing to them for a year. At the beginning of next year/end of this when new models are released I’ll try some out and see if they’re worth it. And then when they refresh their Staff line, I can check it out again.
I’m shocked how low Ballnamic has the Chrome Tour for wind score. It’s probably the best wind ball I’ve ever played.
[QUOTE=”PiratePenguin, post: 12289604, member: 2635″]
I’m shocked how low Ballnamic has the Chrome Tour for wind score. It’s probably the best wind ball I’ve ever played.
[/QUOTE]
I agree with ballnamic’s assessment on that. It felt like the least stable ball I tested on course.
[QUOTE=”PiratePenguin, post: 12289604, member: 2635″]
I’m shocked how low Ballnamic has the Chrome Tour for wind score. It’s probably the best wind ball I’ve ever played.
[/QUOTE]
I’ve played it in a TON Of high wind and it’s been tremendous, so I definitely agree with you.
[QUOTE=”Parrot, post: 12289269, member: 48815″]
It’s not a ball I’ve ever considered. $55/dz is enough for me.
I tried it and liked it, particularly in windy conditions. I preferred the slightly softer feel and higher greenside spin I saw from the TP5 and B XS (gamer for the most part of 3 years). The TP5 gave me a little more distance than the B XS and flew a bit lower. The BX was a bit longer than the TP5.
[/QUOTE]
Be glad it did not suggest the Attomax ball!
[QUOTE=”flopshotpizza, post: 12260986, member: 78397″]
Does anybody know what higher compression ball has the lowest workability score (straighest) on Ballnamic? I’ve seen Q star and Bridgestone RX very low but they are too low compression for me. I’m looking for a fast ball that’s also super straight, and good in the wind.
[/QUOTE]
Left dash, followed very closely by Chrome Soft X LS. There really was nothing else like the LS. Firm, good in the wind, less iron spin but tons of wedge approach spin, and really good around the greens.
[QUOTE=”Parrot, post: 12289188, member: 48815″]
Very interesting. Food for thought.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1713473218949.png”]9258456[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1713473395504.png”]9258458[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Is that the 21 or new 24 Tp5 you entered as your favorite ball?
What did Tp5 rate for greenside spin and putter feel?
[QUOTE=”Dank, post: 12298298, member: 75824″]
Is that the 21 or new 24 Tp5 you entered as your favorite ball?
What did Tp5 rate for greenside spin and putter feel?
[/QUOTE]
It’s the new ball. It rated high spin and firm. The firm part suprises me because I would’ve said feel was only slightly firmer than the B XS for me.
Checked out my current recommendations based on Aerojet irons and the ’24 CS numbers. The irons are very low spin for me, which affects the scores quite a lot.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9260247[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full”]9260248[/ATTACH]
I have CT X to test and need to get some Tour B X and the new Wilson balls to test. I didn’t really like the feel of the Z Star diamond last year.
[QUOTE=”Inioch, post: 12300979, member: 72219″]
Checked out my current recommendations based on Aerojet irons and the ’24 CS numbers. The irons are very low spin for me, which affects the scores quite a lot.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1713876395005.png”]9260247[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1713876415451.png”]9260248[/ATTACH]
I have CT X to test and need to get some Tour B X and the new Wilson balls to test. I didn’t really like the feel of the Z Star diamond last year.
[/QUOTE]
Some very firm and really spinny balls, and Tour B X. Interesting. It’s a good ball.
[QUOTE=”OldandStiff, post: 12300997, member: 53737″]
Some very firm and really spinny balls, and Tour B X. Interesting. It’s a good ball.
[/QUOTE]
It obviously rates spin as more important than the softness I asked for. But I’d say that has a lot to do with the AJ irons being so low spin for me.
[QUOTE=”Inioch, post: 12301230, member: 72219″]
It obviously rates spin as more important rhan the softness I asked for. But I’d say that has a lot to do with the AJ irons being so low spin for me.
[/QUOTE]
Well B X feels softer to most than the rest of those, and isn’t quite as spinny, so it’s the outlier of the group in that sense. But obviously still rates pretty high for your needs.
[QUOTE=”Inioch, post: 12301230, member: 72219″]
It obviously rates spin as more important rhan the softness I asked for.
[/QUOTE]
I played the B XS for a long time. I liked the combo of soft feel and spin. I’d always shied away from the B X because of my preconceived notion that it was too firm and wouldn’t spin enough for me. It spins plenty off the AJs, though not as much as the XS, and has only a little firmer feel (sound) to it. I didn’t notice much difference in spin between it and the XS off the Snakebites, except on shorter pitches around the green and that wasn’t big.
Give it a look. I think you’ll be very pleasantly surprised.
[QUOTE=”Parrot, post: 12301441, member: 48815″]
I played the B XS for a long time. I liked the combo of soft feel and spin. I’d always shied away from the B X because of my preconceived notion that it was too firm and wouldn’t spin enough for me. It spins plenty off the AJs, though not as much as the XS, and has only a little firmer feel (sound) to it. I didn’t notice much difference in spin between it and the XS off the Snakebites, except on shorter pitches around the green and that wasn’t big.
Give it a look. I think you’ll be very pleasantly surprised.
[/QUOTE]
I played a dozen of B XS last year and was quite pleased with them. But seeing what was written about this years models, I’m thinking of trying the B X first. Can’t find the ’24 versions here yet…
[QUOTE=”OldandStiff, post: 12301363, member: 53737″]
Well B X feels softer to most than the rest of those, and isn’t quite as spinny, so it’s the outlier of the group in that sense. But obviously still rates pretty high for your needs.
[/QUOTE]
It is, looking at the Ballnamic data too.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9260343[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full”]9260344[/ATTACH]
Finally jumped on the Ballnamic train today. Very impressive. I thought I was in the best golf ball for my current game, but it appears not. Looking forward to comparing the top couple recommendations to my current gamer. Currently play the Bridgestone Tour B RX (93.7% match), but Ballnamic recommended the following: LA GOLF ball (96.9%), Chrome Tour (96.7%), Tour B X (96.2%), and Z Star XV (95.2%). Chrome Tour is the only golf ball listed that I’ve already tried, so I’m looking forward to seeing if one of these might fit my game a bit better. If not, I’ve greatly enjoyed the Tour B RX and would have no issue sticking with it.
[QUOTE=”Redd, post: 12322397, member: 5622″]
Finally jumped on the Ballnamic train today. Very impressive. I thought I was in the best golf ball for my current game, but it appears not. Looking forward to comparing the top couple recommendations to my current gamer. Currently play the Bridgestone Tour B RX (93.7% match), but Ballnamic recommended the following: LA GOLF ball (96.9%), Chrome Tour (96.7%), Tour B X (96.2%), and Z Star XV (95.2%). Chrome Tour is the only golf ball listed that I’ve already tried, so I’m looking forward to seeing if one of these might fit my game a bit better. If not, I’ve greatly enjoyed the Tour B RX and would have no issue sticking with it.
[/QUOTE]
You gonna try the LA Golf ball? It has popped up in a lot of the surveys but I don’t if anyone has tried it yet.
[QUOTE=”Parrot, post: 12322439, member: 48815″]
You gonna try the LA Golf ball? It has popped up in a lot of the surveys but I don’t if anyone has tried it yet.
[/QUOTE]
That’s a good question and one for which I don’t think I know the answer to, yet. To be completely honest, my initial reaction was “ya, not happening”. I don’t know if that is more due to the price tag or due to knowing what I get with the Chrome Tour and the Tour B line already. As I am typing this and remembering how expensive the LA GOLF ball is, I’m heavily leaning toward not giving it a serious look.
Yeah, I ain’t payin’ $70 for a dozen balls, LA Golf. They were #2 on my list I think.