Although the journey back hasn’t always been a smooth one, Ben Hogan Golf seems to have finally found their footing not just in balancing the task of being a direct to consumer manufacturer, but living up to the expectations of the Ben Hogan name itself. So, with the decision to bring blended iron sets to their consumers, the need came to also update their utility irons to offer full flexibility for golfers.
After the new UiHi was introduced, THP was soon able to get one in hand for a full rundown of just what Ben Hogan Golf has brought to the table

Quick Take
As is the case with the rest of the Ben Hogan Golf offerings right now, the bang for your buck out of the new UiHi clubs is unmatched. A design that is aesthetically classy and in line with the Hogan name, while offering a utility design that isn’t so hung up on distance it loses its playability and ability to blend into an iron set.
The Ben Hogan Golf UiHi
While this isn’t the first utility we have seen from Ben Hogan Golf since its return to the industry, it was definitely beyond time for a refresh. Not only did the company set out to offer a club which will aesthetically fit better with their current iron offerings, but they wanted to bring in more modern technology while keeping the bang for the buck.

Internally, the UiHi (pronounced you-eye-high) is a design which utilizes the blending of a 1020 carbon steel frame with a MS300 steel face laser welded into place. Why different materials for the face? Well, the MS300 can be made much thinner to allow more of the weight to be shifted in the design while also offering more speed. Two other design features stand out with the UiHi and that is both an internal hollow cavity low in the head as well as an external cavity back cutout in the upper rear flange of the club. What does this mean? It means more weight to the perimeters while also keeping a look that isn’t cumbersome or oversized like most utilities out there.
Aesthetic Acrobatics
I have to admit, what Ben Hogan Golf has done here aesthetically with the UiHi within the pricing framework of their direct-to-consumer business infrastructure is above and beyond what one would expect. Yes, the Ben Hogan name stands for something, but the current iteration of the company is ever changing and digging in to find their way of balancing that with the demand of the modern golfer for not sacrificing performance for name and price. I really believe after working with the UiHi that they’ve found their niche.

As a self-admitted utility iron addict who tends to get around a bit, there isn’t anything out there in that segment that looks like this. What I mean there is two-fold in overall footprint and general design. There was clearly a lot of attention paid to the flow of the UiHi in terms of making sure it’s a look that blends into irons. It has got a lot less width in the sole as well as junk in the trunk compared to almost all of the other utility irons out there. The thinner sole has the benefit of the V-Sole design to keep it amply functional for a variety of swings. Also, the dual-cavity like design of the hollow inner and more traditional looking upper cavity makes for a look that at address doesn’t show the entire rear of the club like other utilities do.

Add in the classic satin finish (with rumors of a dark finish later in the year) and general branding being so well done with the bold Ben Hogan script and BH crest on display it’s just a gorgeous golf club. Personally, I also like that they put the number of the club on the sole as well as the loft, some might call that too much, but its common in utilities and was done quite tastefully here.
Function that Blends
I have no issues admitting that when the 18° 3U showed up, I hadn’t really allowed myself to think the lowest loft could be the one I would be working with. You see, the UiHi’s are being offered in three lofts, 18° (3U), 22° (4U), and 26° (5U) and are meant to plug and play into Hogan irons sets as well as others. My mental takeback came from the fact that historically I’ve not had the most consistent success with irons or utilities below 20°, the UiHi kind of blew that out of the water.

Foremost, I want to get into the sound/feel with the UiHi. Utilities in terms of sound are usually in a realm of their own, sound is feel and most tend to come off more firm/sharp than their iron counterparts. Naturally, there are some who get it absolutely right generating a sensation that blends seamlessly and based on the lineage of the Ben Hogan name and the pride they take in it, it should be no wonder that they nailed it with these. At impact on solid and even quasi-solid strikes there is a plush nature to the sound that is spot on with that of a top end forged iron level of feedback. Many times, I found myself chuckling at how pleasing the experience was in terms of feel, kudos to Hogan for not sacrificing that.

While sound/feel are make or break for many of us, the flight when dealing with an iron of this loft is going to be the biggest key to the puzzle. For me, at 18° even paired with the UST Mamiya SmacWrap 780 F4 shaft, I feared too flat and low of a trajectory. To see exactly what was happening with the 3 UiHi, the Foresight GC2 launch monitor was utilized and that data set will follow this section. What you see below is that the flight I got here was pretty stellar. As a higher swing speed player, the 11.6° average launch and 31-yard peak from the 3 UiHi was eye opening. I’ll be real, the first sessions on course with it, I had a feeling it was hitting a really good window, but it wasn’t until seeing the data over a sample size that I realized just how good. Not only that, the descent angle proved it’s a club I can hit into greens and hold them pretty well, countering the reason I have historically always gone hybrid or fairway in this slot.

I know some are all about the distance, and you can see above a 226-yard average from a utility doesn’t leave a lot to pick apart. Hitting ball speeds in the mid 140’s with an 18° iron also made me laugh…a lot, because it wasn’t at all expected, not based on skill or swing speed, but the fact that the profile here is so much smaller than some of the other utilities where I have hit those speeds in the past. That is a nod to the design and face materials, for me it was definitely doing what it was designed to. Will it replace a 5-wood for me distance wise? Probably not. How about a hybrid in that loft? Maybe. But what it offers most comparatively is versatility and flow.

The fact that my average spin rate here was 3,668 with some creeping into the 4,000’s lent the UiHi to offering a lot of flexibility in the bag. Not only was it useable from the tee, but the deck also, although when working with a 3U, it isn’t going to be a fit there for all players, hybrids are still the friends of many. What cemented the designs ability to be hit from a variety of places though was me also acquiring the 22° 4 UiHi and seeing the same things, but with expectedly even easier to get performance.

Are these the most forgiving clubs out there? Of course not, but they do provide a legitimate and more forgiving option than a traditional iron in those lofts while still being entirely workable and flightable depending on your skill level. That was the biggest takeaway for me here with this review, the UiHi’s really do just seamlessly flow into an iron set, they’re not distance monsters with no spin, instead they are incredibly well-balanced clubs that will go toe to toe with other utilities on the market, but at a $110.00 price tag that should turn heads.
The Details
Availability: Now
Where: www.BenHoganGolf.com
Price: $110.00
Dexterity: RH
Options: 3U (18°), 4U (22°), 5U (26°)




[QUOTE=”baylrballa, post: 9436811, member: 52381″]
Haven’t given up on the 22 uihi quite yet, but I’m not sure it’s going to fit what I need. I think I made a bit of a mistake in putting a shaft in more like my hybrid rather than like my irons. It’s flying more like my set 5i rather than being a lower flight 4i replacement. ?
[/QUOTE]
As I said in the review article, these aren’t low spin low launch utilities. They fit the more playable niche of blending with irons rather than being low/flat driving irons.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 9440515, member: 1579″]
As I said in the review article, these aren’t low spin low launch utilities. They fit the more playable niche of blending with irons rather than being low/flat driving irons.
[/QUOTE]
I get it, I was shooting for a replacement for my set 4i that was a bit easier to hit and a little longer (based on some early reviews), not so much a driving iron.
[QUOTE=”baylrballa, post: 9440526, member: 52381″]
I get it, I was shooting for a replacement for my set 4i that was a bit easier to hit and a little longer (based on some early reviews), not so much a driving iron.
[/QUOTE]
You mentioned it having the same flight, hence my reply. A 4i doesnt have to be lower to still cover a distance gap.
Is it ballooning? Overly fade biased flight causing a distance loss? Remind me, are you blending them into Hogan’s or another set? There are lots of parts to this equation
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 9440579, member: 1579″]
You mentioned it having the same flight, hence my reply. A 4i doesnt have to be lower to still cover a distance gap.
Is it ballooning? Overly fade biased flight causing a distance loss? Remind me, are you blending them into Hogan’s or another set? There are lots of parts to this equation
[/QUOTE]
Adding to 919 forged irons.
Seems to flight fine, maybe ballooning a bit. Non scientifically it’s distance is closer to the set 5 than set 4. Which could be due to any number of factors.
Day 28, still in wait que for UiHi 18
[QUOTE=”pinseeker, post: 9451931, member: 49355″]
Day 28, still in wait que for UiHi 18
[/QUOTE]
I have one and love the launch and length of this with the recoil 780 stiff shaft
[QUOTE=”pinseeker, post: 9451931, member: 49355″]
Day 28, still in wait que for UiHi 18
[/QUOTE]
You are close. Mine combos were 35 days plus shipping
[QUOTE=”donny475, post: 9451943, member: 4683″]
I have one and love the launch and length of this with the recoil 780 stiff shaft
[/QUOTE]
good to know. I believe I went with the KBS Tour 90
This club still haunts me! I can’t wait until it shows up the BH demo program!
just heard back from BH. They are a bit behind, but good news is mine is expected to ship this week.
ok, got em….UiHi 3 18* KBS Tour 90 shaft. feels a bit heavy, need to work on swing. Fan club back and forward seems to work best, but too soon to be definitive.
a bit more…..wider stance, a little closer to ball. Started out with toe hits. Clubhead noticeably larger than icon 4 iron. Shafts same length (Icon is +1/2 from std). getting a bit more consistent. I prolly shudda went with the Recoil, but can always reshaft.
[QUOTE=”J.B. Cobb III, post: 9452051, member: 50607″]
This club still haunts me! I can’t wait until it shows up the BH demo program!
[/QUOTE]
They’re really really really fun.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 9459227, member: 1579″]
They’re really really really fun.
[/QUOTE]
oh yeah? when does that start? (on me, Indian not arrow thing).
[QUOTE=”pinseeker, post: 9459532, member: 49355″]
oh yeah? when does that start? (on me, Indian not arrow thing).
[/QUOTE]
As soon as you clear the noggin and just let them work (y)
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 9459541, member: 1579″]
As soon as you clear the noggin and just let them work (y)
[/QUOTE]
I know…I will get there… I am used to smaller head size, lighter shaft e.t.c. I also find that if I swing with a bit more gusto, I get better contact. And you are right, a lot in my own head. Hitting into a net isn’t much of an indicator either as there is not enough time to see results. But after a few adjustments, I was able to consistently hit same spot on suspended target. I am hoping to see a slow rise, higher apex that you have described previously. Thanks for your inspiration.
[QUOTE=”pinseeker, post: 9459561, member: 49355″]
I know…I will get there… I am used to smaller head size, lighter shaft e.t.c. I also find that if I swing with a bit more gusto, I get better contact. And you are right, a lot in my own head. Hitting into a net isn’t much of an indicator either as there is not enough time to see results. But after a few adjustments, I was able to consistently hit same spot on suspended target. I am hoping to see a slow rise, higher apex that you have described previously. Thanks for your inspiration.
[/QUOTE]
What’s the apex you’re looking for?
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 9459574, member: 1579″]
What’s the apex you’re looking for?
[/QUOTE]
enough. kind of hard to judge when I only see the first 10 feet of travel. I would like enough to get me a bit more distance without ballooning. I find the 4 Icon about right and actually is a bit better than I was getting in 3H from Tour Edge Hybrid.
I did a bit of shaft comparisons. The KBS Tour 90 is the lightest of the line at 102g for S flex, Recoil 760ES F2 is 68g. My thinking for choosing the KBS was that I feel as though the S flex will enhance straighter shots with a long iron and the lighter shaft (for steel) would make it handle a little like a shaft with softer flex. I may be wrong, but that was my thinking. I might have to up my SS to get the stiff to perform, but for a utility, I think I can handle it. Also the KBS is touted to have higher trajectory. Yes, I realize that flex and weight are two different factors, but hoping my choices will sort of equal out each other. In any event – done deal.
I’ve bent my 4U 1.5 strong now to fill the gap in my bag better between my PTx Pro 5i and SIM 5w, and it’s been good. Still amazed at the ability to flight these up or down, and the insnanely stellar feel and consistency in such a compact utility footprint. It’s feel like the Srixon U’s which is the ultimate compliment, but more speed and more distance.
These are just insane fun, and silly good. You will not find a utility that does what these do at this price point, it’s absurd.
Ordered on July 9. Asked today to check on status. The wait isn’t fun but Ben Hogan Golf is DEFINITELY doing something right.
[ATTACH type=”full”]8957761[/ATTACH]
Nothing against the Hogan product but not sure where this would fit in my bag. Have played around with a couple of these. I’m not a particularly long hitter so wouldn’t be using it off the tee on a short par 4.No use for it out of the rough and for a fairway shot would rather use a hybrid-which works better out of the rough.
[QUOTE=”smgoldstein, post: 9469396, member: 4509″]
Nothing against the Hogan product but not sure where this would fit in my bag. Have played around with a couple of these. I’m not a particularly long hitter so wouldn’t be using it off the tee on a short par 4.No use for it out of the rough and for a fairway shot would rather use a hybrid-which works better out of the rough.
[/QUOTE]
It’s all about needs. The UiHi is easier to hit than the PTx Pro it has the same loft as, which is saying something, but a hybrid will always offer more forgiveness than an iron, utility or not.
3 rounds in and it’s not really doing it for me. The thing punishes you if you don’t put a good strike on it. Very little little forgiveness. When you do put a good strike on it, it goes and feels great, but those off centre strikes are crucified. From my experience, if you aren’t a good ball striker, this may not be for you.
[QUOTE=”Mark_UK, post: 9469945, member: 5144″]
3 rounds in and it’s not really doing it for me. The thing punishes you if you don’t put a good strike on it. Very little little forgiveness. When you do put a good strike on it, it goes and feels great, but those off centre strikes are crucified. From my experience, if you aren’t a good ball striker, this may not be for you.
[/QUOTE]
It’s one of the smaller utilities out there so this isn’t all that surprising being honest, to keep this profile, it’s going to be less forgiving than one with a ton of junk in the trunk like so many out there. As with anything, consistency plays a role when you get into the long irons, some need max forgiveness there, and some don’t.
sometimes I wonder if the change in today’s clubs having stronger lofts has anything to do with it. If I think back, I used to carry the low lofts i.e. 2, 3,4 irons and even a 1 iron and didn’t have a whole lot of problems with them. This is back in the blade era i.e. Spalding, and the like. Of course I was 40 years younger then too. I put my newly acquired 18* in the spare bag (for now) because I think it was due to my selection of the wrong shaft. And yeah, I know “get a fitting” but let’s not go there. My point being, today’s 3 iron is yesteryear’s 5 iron. OTOH, one would think if that were the case, I would be hitting my irons further now. While in fact, I have lost 40 yards throughout the bag in the past 3 or 4 years. I don’t know….just go play I guess. I will say though, that the new ICON’s have given me back a little of that yardage loss, but probably a mental thing.
I was recommended to a club builder/fitter by Tom Wishon. ADS Golf in Vista California. I am having them reshaft my UiHi 3 utility. Going with UST Recoil 760ES F2 to match my ICON set. Pricing is reasonable around $60 including new Lamkin Grip. Now I will have a nearly new KBS Tour 90 Stiff with the Ben Hogan Lamkin Z5 grip in case anyone is interested in buying for cheap.
Took this a small bit stronger, and after flirting with the EXS Ti I’m going to put it back in the bag. The real solution for me is when I play longer courses to drop the GW and put the 3 AND 4 into the bag. The data I recorded while reviewing these still stands true for me.
Frankly I don’t know why I’m trying other things besides boredom and a fact I’ve never been as comfortable with my entire bag as I am right now. It scares me :ROFLMAO:
One thing I don’t quite get. On Hogan site, they list swing weight for UiHi 3 iron as D1 for both the KBS Tour and the UST 760ES. There is 30g difference between the two. I had mine reshafted with the 760 with a mid size grip from Lamkin and it measures in at a C8. Hopefully its ok otherwise I will have to resort to a little lead tape.
Just logging back as i read this review in July, I now own 2 of them, i have the 3 and 4 UiHi’s and they are no joke. These pair so well with my Hogan Combo set of PTXPros and Icons, pure money!
Great to see these ubs flat out perform, the looks and technology are awesome at Ben Hogan!
These definitely have been on my radar for some time. When I was chosen for the Hogan Mamiya, event, access to the 4 UiHi was the only thing that made me really consider going with the combo set. The traditional look with a bit more forgiveness in the longer iron appeals to me.
I have the 26° UiHi in my cart right now. I just can’t pull the trigger until I can hit it first.
So, I have Ben Hogan on the brain right now. Maybe a combination of the Ben Hogan Experience announcement and [USER=782]@ddec[/USER] mentioning the ICONs in an MB thread. I poked around their site a bit and noticed the combo set is only available in one configuration in terms of where the ICONs stop. Not that I am pulling the trigger right now. But, I was hoping they had the option of going ICON into the 6 iron. Then, I look at the UiHi and see it has a very similar look to the PTx Pro. Then, my brain goes into ponder mode. How would those compare to the PTx Pro? Would they play more like a standard iron than a UT?
The winter is just too long and I can’t help but dream about equipment.
[QUOTE=”radiman, post: 9746203, member: 15228″]
So, I have Ben Hogan on the brain right now. Maybe a combination of the Ben Hogan Experience announcement and [USER=782]@ddec[/USER] mentioning the ICONs in an MB thread. I poked around their site a bit and noticed the combo set is only available in one configuration in terms of where the ICONs stop. Not that I am pulling the trigger right now. But, I was hoping they had the option of going ICON into the 6 iron. Then, I look at the UiHi and see it has a very similar look to the PTx Pro. Then, my brain goes into ponder mode. How would those compare to the PTx Pro? Would they play more like a standard iron than a UT?
The winter is just too long and I can’t help but dream about equipment.
[/QUOTE]
I think they play more like a UT than an iron, but just my feelings. Then again, I also believe the PTx Pro long irons are the star of the show of combos. Hollow body, but still very small footprint and found better than most hollow body irons.
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 9746231, member: 3″]
I think they play more like a UT than an iron, but just my feelings. Then again, I also believe the PTx Pro long irons are the star of the show of combos. Hollow body, but still very small footprint and found better than most hollow body irons.
[/QUOTE]
Are the UiHi significantly larger than the Pros?
[QUOTE=”radiman, post: 9746232, member: 15228″]
Are the UiHi significantly larger than the Pros?
[/QUOTE]
[USER=24698]@Brewton[/USER] Can you answer this?
[QUOTE=”radiman, post: 9746232, member: 15228″]
Are the UiHi significantly larger than the Pros?
[/QUOTE]
I dont have one here to measure, but I believe [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] might.
[QUOTE=”radiman, post: 9746232, member: 15228″]
Are the UiHi significantly larger than the Pros?
[/QUOTE]
Let me get home to mine today, they’re not though. One of the smaller utilities out there.
[ATTACH type=”full”]8986832[/ATTACH]
4 is a UiHi, 5-7 Pro, 8-P ICON
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 9746471, member: 1579″]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”AA65FFEC-A4FE-47CA-8082-3AFCE41E2EB6.jpeg”]8986832[/ATTACH]
4 is a UiHi, 5-7 Pro, 8-P ICON
[/QUOTE]
Those do blend pretty nicely.
[QUOTE=”J.B. Cobb III, post: 9746236, member: 50607″]
[USER=24698]@Brewton[/USER] Can you answer this?
[/QUOTE]
I would not say significantly larger, but the sold and cavity is definitely bigger than the PTx PRO. The image [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] shows above is a great and accurate representation of how much bigger (slightly) and it was designed to blend into that combo set.
It’s my favorite setup and my current setup:
3 – UiHi
4 – UiHi
5-7 PTx PRO
8-P ICON
Besides the model name on the back, looking down at each iron, you would think it is one set designed to go together while providing features and benefits all the way through the set.
Received a 22* UiHi last Friday that I ordered through the demo program. Took several cuts with it Saturday and Sunday. Seems like a solid club but I can’t see, at least yet, that it is going to give me anything more than I get with the PTx 4 iron, which I actually prefer to the PTx Pro 4 iron. May be a tad easier to launch off the deck for me but not anything substantial and they are very equal off the tee. Have not seen any distance gains and, in fact, the UiHi I think may be a little shorter for me. Will continue playing it over the next week and a half until I have to return it but can’t see this being a future purchase for me.
I added two UiHi utility irons to my iron set to make a combo set with the PTx Pros. Wanted as much help as possible in the long irons. The lofts have been tweaked to 20° and 23°.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9259206[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full”]9259207[/ATTACH]
Still one of my favorite reviews I’ve ever written. Wish that iteration of Hogan had lasted
I’m really excited to play these this season. They just look fun.
[QUOTE=”Thrillbilly Jim, post: 12296379, member: 50607″]
I’m really excited to play these this season. They just look fun.
[/QUOTE]
They are, but I will say they’re not the easiest to hit in terms of forgiveness on the course.
This might be the most underrated club I have ever hit!
If you’re looking for a little extra help in those longer irons, but you don’t want a chunky utility iron, you need to look at this iron. Easy to hit, elevates effortlessly, looks good, not expensive. ????????
The UiHi utility is just a fun club to hit. Has a good medium boring flight. It will come in handy playing in the coastal winds here in Wilmywood.