Are you a short game wizard? The type of player which demands maximum versatility in order to command the highest level of precision into and around the greens?
The safe bet for most of us mere mortals kicking it around our local courses and muni’s is the answer to that is a pretty quick no. If you are, however, a master of all things short game then feel free to dive into any one of our thousands of other articles as this one may not be for you.
This review is about breaking down walls and preconceptions via the cavity back wedge, and no one has been committed to doing just that as much as Cleveland Golf has. So, when we got the chance to get both versions of their new CBZ wedge design which has evolved the concept inside and out, we naturally wanted to bring all the info and feedback to each and every one of you.

Quick Take
Without a doubt, the best cavity back wedge design yet from Cleveland Golf. Yes, the biggest star is the implementation of Z-Alloy into cavity driven wedge design, but that was simply the start. From a feedback perspective, both the standard and full-face high-toe versions are excellent, providing a feel which flows seamlessly into and with the companies RTZ’s. More importantly though, the emphasis on face design as well as sole grind makes them possibly most versatile cavity back wedge on the market.
Filling the Wedgucational Cavity
Sure, that title is a bit on the campy side of things, but there will be no apologies as it sums up what not only Cleveland, but every single golf manufacturer out there is facing when it comes to getting people to try a more forgiving wedge. Clearly, there is a disconnect when 87% of golfers are playing an iron which emphasizes forgiveness, but most continue to automatically put a set of bladed wedges into the bag without consideration of what one, or more, cavity driven designs could provide for them on the course.
In that battle, however, Cleveland Golf has led the charge in trying to get golfers to think of their wedges in the same way that they do their irons. Sure, it is a shot across the bow at how most of us select our wedges, most of the time just opting for what we do out of habit or fear of change more than anything else. But the goal is to break down barriers, and just as once upon a time cavity back irons were seen as blasphemous to traditionalists for fears of sacrificing versatility and workability, wedges are currently undergoing that same battle.

Although they were not the first to do a cavity back wedge design, Cleveland Golf has certainly been the most committed to not only offering them but continuing to innovate and evolve the concept. The company dipped their toes into the water way back into the CG wedge era, but it was with the CBX in 2017 that they jumped all the way into the deep end. Since then, there have been multiple iterations and evolutions with many receiving extremely positive feedback from golfers everywhere. This year, however, marked the first version of the CBZ wedge.
When Cleveland Golf announced their release of the RTZ bladed wedges driven by an all new base material that they created with Z-Alloy (you can read about that here) we here at THP couldn’t help but think about other prospective applications. Sure, many minds went right to irons, but the potential impact into their cavity back wedges was clear given what the material does in terms of not only feel and durability, but mass savings.

So, the company went to work, redesigning the concept, and creating the CBZ. With a 94% larger Gelback TPU internal insert combined with the benefits of Z-Alloy, these wedges look to bring not just better feel to the table but also increased spin consistency and efficiency as well. As if that wasn’t enough, heavy attention also went into the looks and sole grind options available.
We got each in hand for a closer look and put both the 50V (Standard) and 54C (Full Face) through their paces.
Cleveland CBZ 50V
Visually, the standard groove models of the CBZ’s are check all of the boxed. At setup, it doesn’t look like a cavity back and the overall shaping hides everything incredibly well with the topline, leading edge, as well as hosel transition looking very much like a standard Cleveland wedge. Add in the aggressive face/groove milling, and when you put it down next to a 50 degree RTZ, it was nearly impossible to differentiate.


Beyond that, the performance here was stellar. With it being a gap wedge loft, it was fun to be able to treat it as both a full swing wedge as well as still using it for pitches and chips. The V-Grind takes material from both the leading and trail edges to allow for enough bounce to bring more forgiveness but preventing any digging into and out of the soil on full swings.
The feedback through impact was shockingly good, the slightest bit more muted than the RTZ’s are for this reviewer, but the closest to their flagship wedge line that Cleveland Golf has gotten so far. You do keep a “good” feel across more of the face than the RTZ, which is what should happen.

As you can see in the data below, speed nor launch was an issue, and the overall spin on both full and 50 yard shots made for impressive precision with no issues at all holding greens. Honestly, even if you don’t want to give up the versatility of a bladed wedge in sand and lob lofts, the CBZ in a gap wedge is well worth trying, especially if you ever use that club on full swings.
Cleveland Golf CBZ 54C Full Face
While the company is declaring the Full Face as an additional offering within the core CBZ wedge lineup, it is still a different animal in a few ways. Foremost, visually, the size here is notably bigger, which is expected given the Full Face grooves, but it is the altered High Toe shaping which really shifts things.
Now, that does not mean it is bad, quite the opposite actually as like its sibling, every radius on each clubhead makes for a fantastic visual. Unsurprisingly, if you like the High Toe and Full Face look, you will love this, if you prefer the traditional shaping, then it may not be your cup of tea.


In terms of feel/sound, the Full Face feedback during testing was practically identical to that of the traditional shaping. There is the same dense nature to things across a broader margin of the face that you get in the other model, but here the added groove extension takes it up a notch for those that may visit the toe every now and again.
While the feel is excellent, it is the C-Grind here that shined the most during testing. You see, this is the most evolved and versatile grind that this reviewer has tested on any Cleveland cavity back wedge yet. The softer leading edge helps get into the turf, but that rear crescent provided a lot more greenside versatility than in the past.

While they have always been good from bunkers, it was the tight greenside lies that surprised the most, allowing a shocking amount of versatility in a wildly more forgiving design than the standard RTZ. As was with the 50, you can see in the data here that spin was not an issue, hitting right around 9,000 RPM on average for full swings. From full swings to those 75 yard shots, the ability to take dead aim at targets is certainly all there.
Head to Head – CBZ Wedge vs RTZ Wedge
Of course, we also know that it is natural to be a bit skeptical of big changes, and to some people the idea of a cavity back wedge in their bag is indeed a substantial change. Often times the reasoning for not giving a design like the CBZ wedge a chance comes back to the notion that they will launch too high, spin too little, or not offer the same level of consistency. To put that to the test, during the data collection for this review, numbers on the 50 and 54 degree CBZ’s were also recorded.

When taking a look at the averages above, no doubt that some will hyper-fixate on the spin being lower in the CBZ wedge, but in doing so miss the big picture. What exactly is that? It is that the differences are much more minor than most would ever have believed coming into this comparison. In fact, the variance is so minor it might just surprise you when stepping back to see the overall picture the data is painting. The reality is not as much is being left out there as some want to believe, especially when you then add in the increased playability on shots all across the face with the CBZ’s.
The Details – CBZ Wedge
To be clear, we aren’t sitting here saying that everyone should move to the CBZ wedge, individual fit and needs will always vary based on the golfer as well as skill level. However, it is time for the lack of willingness to try cavity back wedges based on what they used to be, to go away. These are the best iteration yet, and also the most widely playable.
Cleveland Golf offers the CBZ wedge in standard face grooves (44-60 degrees) as well as Full-Face (50-60 degrees) to ensure there is something for everyone. The standard shaft pairing is the KBS Hi Rev 2.0 shaft, though there are graphite KBS options available as well.
The new Cleveland CBZ wedges are priced at $179.99. You can order them directly from Cleveland Golf with full customization options available, and they are also available at retailers worldwide.





The CBZ line is by far the best of the cavity back wedges I’ve hit. More consistent and feel better than the other options
Looks like the Srixon Experience is going to give us a bunch more reviews on these very excited to see that they need more press
[QUOTE=”GolfSquatch, post: 13709957, member: 85082″]
Looks like the Srixon Experience is going to give us a bunch more reviews on these very excited to see that they need more press
[/QUOTE]
Hopefully those shooting their shot at getting in take the time to dive into this one, the CBZ’s are so so so solid for sure!
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13710008, member: 1579″]
Hopefully those shooting their shot at getting in take the time to dive into this one, the CBZ’s are so so so solid for sure!
[/QUOTE]
I will be throwing in for sure, and I already have the CBZ’s I hope to add some review stuff as well once I get the shafts changed over to the Catalyst spinners
[QUOTE=”Slowmo, post: 13709888, member: 67660″]
The CBZ line is by far the best of the cavity back wedges I’ve hit. More consistent and feel better than the other options
[/QUOTE]
I had the CBX zipcore from a few generations ago and thought it felt pretty darn good. If the new Z is improved feel as advertised, should be a big deal. Little bit torn on the 50° CBZ as I like the full face grooves but prefer the shape of the traditional vs high toe.
[QUOTE=”Wonger, post: 13710041, member: 74038″]
I had the CBX zipcore from a few generations ago and thought it felt pretty darn good. If the new Z is improved feel as advertised, should be a big deal. Little bit torn on the 50° CBZ as I like the full face grooves but prefer the shape of the traditional vs high toe.
[/QUOTE]
I did that direct compare, and yes, at least to me the feel is much better with the CBZ nice and buttery even wiht a steel shaft vs the graphite on my CBX zipcores
Interesting article, I would not have assumed the spin, launch, and land angle would be so similar.
I am curious as to why the 54* 75y data came out so differently between the two clubs when everything else was so tight. The 4* lower launch, 7* lower descent, and 5yd release almost seem like an outlier.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13709874, member: 1579″]
Agree.
I think Cobra has actually gotten closest, but Cleveland is still by far the leader in the CB wedge designs.
[/QUOTE]
Sadly I have not tried the Cobra model. But I will gladly take your word for it.
[QUOTE=”BigMac, post: 13709724, member: 3386″]
Cleveland has made huge strides in the CB wedge space. The last ones I had in the bag were the 588 RTX CB back around 2013 or so, and I wasn’t much of a fan of those. I thought the feel was pretty hard and didn’t see a lot in the way of forgiveness. The CBZ are light years beyond them in every way, they very well might be the best feeling wedges I’ve ever hit.
[/QUOTE]
I remember sitting in their conference room and them show [USER=3]@JB[/USER] and I the first CBX that would be released later that year. I thought that would hit a really good segment and it’s only gotten better.
Nice write up, these look really good for the CB style and the performance is great based off of the numbers.
[QUOTE=”ddec, post: 13710089, member: 782″]
I remember sitting in their conference room and them show [USER=3]@JB[/USER] and I the first CBX that would be released later that year. I thought that would hit a really good segment and it’s only gotten better.
[/QUOTE]
They really have improved this lineup with each iteration.
[QUOTE=”Wonger, post: 13710041, member: 74038″]
I had the CBX zipcore from a few generations ago and thought it felt pretty darn good. If the new Z is improved feel as advertised, should be a big deal. Little bit torn on the 50° CBZ as I like the full face grooves but prefer the shape of the traditional vs high toe.
[/QUOTE]
Z-Alloy is amazeballs.
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 13710181, member: 3″]
They really have improved this lineup with each iteration.
[/QUOTE]
they really have and it’s neat having seen it from the very early stages.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13709871, member: 1579″]
1) I’m not saying that they can’t be used for partials, it’s more that in that spot specifically the club is usually much more a full swing club for amateurs compared to sand and lob wedges.
Likewise though, some CB wedges have been extremely limited in versatility through wider soles with very straight forward designs and grinds, I think that’s still stuck in the head of some people when reviews of these types of wedges come up. Cleveland has gone all in on improving versatility each and every iteration, and it’s paid off.
2) It’s primarily a visual preference for some imo with the shaping being different than traditional teardrop looks. Add in the full face grooves and it’s more visual surface area for comfort, in the hands of the right player. There’s no impact on delivery/shanks though, that’s a user thing.
3) Biggest thing imo is being honest with how you choose to play your wedge game with what shots you like to hit, as well as where you struggle. Course conditions matter to talk about too, especially if you’re going to an indoor fitting.
I hope that all helps? If not, please don’t hesitate to expound more, I’m here to help!
[/QUOTE]
read through it several times. appreciate it. learning little by little.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13710184, member: 1579″]
Z-Alloy is amazeballs.
[/QUOTE]
If anything this is an undersell
[IMG alt=”Over It Whatever GIF”]https://media4.giphy.com/media/jEirVKZl0JytW/200.gif[/IMG]
Am I allowed to say my cavity has been weducated? I’m like 30% through the article and I think I’m hilarious.
I love the article [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] . I have two of the older model of these wedges and they are fantastic. I can only imagine what the new ones with Z-alloy are going to do. To one of your first points, the thing that I like most about them is how substantial they feel. I don’t like going from being one of the 78% of golfers with GI irons to blade wedges, unless maybe at the highest loft.
Full transparency, CB wedges are a bit of black hole for me at the moment. I absolutely love the look of these, along with the RTZ.
Love how they are trying to cater to a wider swath of golfers there though…
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13710184, member: 1579″]
Z-Alloy is amazeballs.
[/QUOTE]
I wonder how long until we see Cleveland share it with other Dunlop brands…
[QUOTE=”amarkabove, post: 13710417, member: 75272″]
I wonder how long until we see Cleveland share it with other Dunlop brands…
[/QUOTE]
That could be some magical collaboration
Thanks [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] for that rundown and comparison. That CBZ 50 V looks like a really fun club to have in the bag. I am someone who stops with the Gap or AW for my full swings, and this one is checking a lot of what I need from that spot.
[QUOTE=”MikeG, post: 13710575, member: 15992″]
Thanks [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] for that rundown and comparison. That CBZ 50 V looks like a really fun club to have in the bag. I am someone who stops with the Gap or AW for my full swings, and this one is checking a lot of what I need from that spot.
[/QUOTE]
Glad you enjoyed it!
I’ve honestly had a lot of fun with it in that gap spot during review testing. Looks great, fun to hit too.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13709874, member: 1579″]
Agree.
I think Cobra has actually gotten closest, but Cleveland is still by far the leader in the CB wedge designs.
[/QUOTE]
I agree here. I feel like Cobra jumped Callaway and Cleveland is still the gold standard with this. Callaway just struggles to make a CB wedge look appealing
All about design intent.
It’s the unique thing about a CB wedge design. One camp is for it to be its own standalone all about maximizing launch and forgiveness, while the other is about blending and bridging the gap from a bladed wedge to something that offers familiar visuals at setup but with the added playability
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13711040, member: 1579″]
All about design intent.
It’s the unique think about a CB wedge design. One camp is for it to be its own standalone all about maximizing launch and forgiveness, while the other is about blending and bridging the gap from a bladed wedge to something that offers familiar visuals at setup but with the added playability
[/QUOTE]
I think that’s a great description of the Clevland wedge family of products. You even have a bigger forgiveness set when you think smart some too on there
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13711033, member: 1579″]
Glad you enjoyed it!
I’ve honestly had a lot of fun with it in that gap spot during review testing. Looks great, fun to hit too.
[/QUOTE]
I think with this club Cleveland has slowly upped the aesthetics to make it look a lot better and visually remove some of that “game improvement” wedge look if that makes sense. This one looks like it could blend easily with anything it he lineup
[QUOTE=”MikeG, post: 13711138, member: 15992″]
I think with this club Cleveland has slowly upped the aesthetics to make it look a lot better and visually remove some of that “game improvement” wedge look if that makes sense. This one looks like it could blend easily with anything it he lineup
[/QUOTE]
At setup, most wont be able to differentiate, its gotten that good
It looks like they’ve already put the technology to work in the new Srixon ZXiR and ZXiR HL irons with the addition of i-Alloy. If the irons feel anywhere near as good as the CBZ wedges I have a feeling they could be really really good.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13711150, member: 1579″]
At setup, most wont be able to differentiate, its gotten that good
[/QUOTE]
Tale of two 50’s.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9400083[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”Bosco…, post: 13711196, member: 65357″]
Tale of two 50’s.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_9312.jpeg”]9400083[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
I’ve got a solid one of both square at address I’ll put up tomorrow. It’s incredibly hard to differentiate when they’re set up square.
Great article James! I’m still enjoying the OG CBX wedges, but every new Cleveland update made me want to trade up. Now I’m glad I waited lol! These will be in the bag at some point soon.
I’ve generally had no problems playing the CBXs, except maybe really tight lies. I’m thinking maybe it would be a good idea to have a low bounce alternative as an option. Do you have any thoughts on the RTZ Adapt 8* bounce for those type of conditions, or is there a CBZ option as well?
I wouldn’t have guess the ball flight numbers would have been so similar.
I always waffle with a CB wedge at the SW spot but 100% sold for a GW. I’m guessing the waffle it pretty much mental at this point.
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 13711589, member: 62865″]
I wouldn’t have guess the ball flight numbers would have been so similar.
I always waffle with a CB wedge at the SW spot but 100% sold for a GW. I’m guessing the waffle it pretty much mental at this point.
[/QUOTE]
Just do it. I got both the 50 for GW and 56 for SW because we all need help out of the sand. They’re scheduled to be delivered today.
Nice write up, thanks Just so happens I played with a 58 full face, 10* yesterday of a friends with a Dart 75 attached. Nice, for me more mid launch. Felt soft like, was very decent on hard pan, overall pretty nice. I actually like it more than my Opus
[QUOTE=”AuzzieMatt, post: 13711607, member: 54652″]
Just do it. I got both the 50 for GW and 56 for SW because we all need help out of the sand. They’re scheduled to be delivered today.
[/QUOTE]
let me know how they work from hard pan bunkers as I face those a good bit
[QUOTE=”AuzzieMatt, post: 13711607, member: 54652″]
Just do it. I got both the 50 for GW and 56 for SW because we all need help out of the sand. They’re scheduled to be delivered today.
[/QUOTE]
And I already half did, a PW and GW are on order, just held back from the rest. There have been several times I was a CB at 54 with both Cleveland and Cobra but later swapped into a more blade style
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 13711713, member: 62865″]
let me know how they work from hard pan bunkers as I face those a good bit
[/QUOTE]
Next season. Those types of bunkers are plentiful around here!
I have CBX2’s in my bag at 50°, 54°, and 58°. The only drawback, and it really doesn’t bother me too much is opening the clubface on hardpan! But with that said, because of the way the ball comes off of these clubs, I seldom open the face with my 58°, unless in sand, where a close up shot warrants it. Play a tight chip with the club in a normal position is not a problem with the CBX2’s, as the ball comes off fairly softly, and distance is controlled with the backswing, or planting the leading edge of the club if I have a slight uphill. Great feel with these, as I can only imagine that the CBZ’s has improved on this! Not in the market at this time, but will keep an eye out for these in the future…
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 13711720, member: 62865″]
And I already half did, a PW and GW are on order, just held back from the rest. There have been several times I was a CB at 54 with both Cleveland and Cobra but later swapped into a more blade style
[/QUOTE]
What lofts on the PW and GW?
[QUOTE=”GolfSquatch, post: 13711817, member: 85082″]
What lofts on the PW and GW?
[/QUOTE]
44 and 48 for me
Really appreciate you all that dove into this one, doing so. Makes for some fun conversation and I hope it brought a little clarity on the CBZ performance to people.
My custom 56 Full face, can’t wait to receive it. I ordered it almost a month ago haha.
These will be one of the stars in this amazingness upcoming.
[URL unfurl=”true”]https://www.thehackersparadise.com/forum/index.php?threads/the-2026-srixon-experience.8978539/[/URL]
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 13712375, member: 3″]
These will be one of the stars in this amazingness upcoming.
[URL unfurl=”true”]https://www.thehackersparadise.com/forum/index.php?threads/the-2026-srixon-experience.8978539/[/URL]
[/QUOTE]
These could probably carve that Goat Track up.
[QUOTE=”amarkabove, post: 13712381, member: 75272″]
These could probably carve that Goat Track up.
[/QUOTE]
We are going to find out.
[QUOTE=”GolfSquatch, post: 13712391, member: 85082″]
Those wedges plus the goat track is going to be a fun follow I’ll call it early at least one ace coming
[/QUOTE]
I agree with you.
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 13712375, member: 3″]
These will be one of the stars in this amazingness upcoming.
[URL unfurl=”true”]https://www.thehackersparadise.com/forum/index.php?threads/the-2026-srixon-experience.8978539/[/URL]
[/QUOTE]
Love you hat everyone will get these in the bag. I can’t wait to see how players of all handicaps get along with them over an extended period
[QUOTE=”Grins, post: 13711494, member: 6320″]
Great article James! I’m still enjoying the OG CBX wedges, but every new Cleveland update made me want to trade up. Now I’m glad I waited lol! These will be in the bag at some point soon.
I’ve generally had no problems playing the CBXs, except maybe really tight lies. I’m thinking maybe it would be a good idea to have a low bounce alternative as an option. Do you have any thoughts on the RTZ Adapt 8* bounce for those type of conditions, or is there a CBZ option as well?
[/QUOTE]
Sometimes messages can get lost in the shuffle of activity. Tagging someone withe the @ symbol helps with notifications
[USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]
[QUOTE=”drb1956, post: 13711789, member: 72342″]
The only drawback, and it really doesn’t bother me too much is opening the clubface on hardpan!
[/QUOTE]
interested to hear why. I don’t run into a ton of hardpan but sometimes and when I do would rarely want to open the face anyway but would be interested in what you are running into
[QUOTE=”amarkabove, post: 13712381, member: 75272″]
These could probably carve that Goat Track up.
[/QUOTE]
not in my hands! I can miss with anything lol