Are you a short game wizard? The type of player which demands maximum versatility in order to command the highest level of precision into and around the greens?
The safe bet for most of us mere mortals kicking it around our local courses and muni’s is the answer to that is a pretty quick no. If you are, however, a master of all things short game then feel free to dive into any one of our thousands of other articles as this one may not be for you.
This review is about breaking down walls and preconceptions via the cavity back wedge, and no one has been committed to doing just that as much as Cleveland Golf has. So, when we got the chance to get both versions of their new CBZ wedge design which has evolved the concept inside and out, we naturally wanted to bring all the info and feedback to each and every one of you.

Quick Take
Without a doubt, the best cavity back wedge design yet from Cleveland Golf. Yes, the biggest star is the implementation of Z-Alloy into cavity driven wedge design, but that was simply the start. From a feedback perspective, both the standard and full-face high-toe versions are excellent, providing a feel which flows seamlessly into and with the companies RTZ’s. More importantly though, the emphasis on face design as well as sole grind makes them possibly most versatile cavity back wedge on the market.
Filling the Wedgucational Cavity
Sure, that title is a bit on the campy side of things, but there will be no apologies as it sums up what not only Cleveland, but every single golf manufacturer out there is facing when it comes to getting people to try a more forgiving wedge. Clearly, there is a disconnect when 87% of golfers are playing an iron which emphasizes forgiveness, but most continue to automatically put a set of bladed wedges into the bag without consideration of what one, or more, cavity driven designs could provide for them on the course.
In that battle, however, Cleveland Golf has led the charge in trying to get golfers to think of their wedges in the same way that they do their irons. Sure, it is a shot across the bow at how most of us select our wedges, most of the time just opting for what we do out of habit or fear of change more than anything else. But the goal is to break down barriers, and just as once upon a time cavity back irons were seen as blasphemous to traditionalists for fears of sacrificing versatility and workability, wedges are currently undergoing that same battle.

Although they were not the first to do a cavity back wedge design, Cleveland Golf has certainly been the most committed to not only offering them but continuing to innovate and evolve the concept. The company dipped their toes into the water way back into the CG wedge era, but it was with the CBX in 2017 that they jumped all the way into the deep end. Since then, there have been multiple iterations and evolutions with many receiving extremely positive feedback from golfers everywhere. This year, however, marked the first version of the CBZ wedge.
When Cleveland Golf announced their release of the RTZ bladed wedges driven by an all new base material that they created with Z-Alloy (you can read about that here) we here at THP couldn’t help but think about other prospective applications. Sure, many minds went right to irons, but the potential impact into their cavity back wedges was clear given what the material does in terms of not only feel and durability, but mass savings.

So, the company went to work, redesigning the concept, and creating the CBZ. With a 94% larger Gelback TPU internal insert combined with the benefits of Z-Alloy, these wedges look to bring not just better feel to the table but also increased spin consistency and efficiency as well. As if that wasn’t enough, heavy attention also went into the looks and sole grind options available.
We got each in hand for a closer look and put both the 50V (Standard) and 54C (Full Face) through their paces.
Cleveland CBZ 50V
Visually, the standard groove models of the CBZ’s are check all of the boxed. At setup, it doesn’t look like a cavity back and the overall shaping hides everything incredibly well with the topline, leading edge, as well as hosel transition looking very much like a standard Cleveland wedge. Add in the aggressive face/groove milling, and when you put it down next to a 50 degree RTZ, it was nearly impossible to differentiate.


Beyond that, the performance here was stellar. With it being a gap wedge loft, it was fun to be able to treat it as both a full swing wedge as well as still using it for pitches and chips. The V-Grind takes material from both the leading and trail edges to allow for enough bounce to bring more forgiveness but preventing any digging into and out of the soil on full swings.
The feedback through impact was shockingly good, the slightest bit more muted than the RTZ’s are for this reviewer, but the closest to their flagship wedge line that Cleveland Golf has gotten so far. You do keep a “good” feel across more of the face than the RTZ, which is what should happen.

As you can see in the data below, speed nor launch was an issue, and the overall spin on both full and 50 yard shots made for impressive precision with no issues at all holding greens. Honestly, even if you don’t want to give up the versatility of a bladed wedge in sand and lob lofts, the CBZ in a gap wedge is well worth trying, especially if you ever use that club on full swings.
Cleveland Golf CBZ 54C Full Face
While the company is declaring the Full Face as an additional offering within the core CBZ wedge lineup, it is still a different animal in a few ways. Foremost, visually, the size here is notably bigger, which is expected given the Full Face grooves, but it is the altered High Toe shaping which really shifts things.
Now, that does not mean it is bad, quite the opposite actually as like its sibling, every radius on each clubhead makes for a fantastic visual. Unsurprisingly, if you like the High Toe and Full Face look, you will love this, if you prefer the traditional shaping, then it may not be your cup of tea.


In terms of feel/sound, the Full Face feedback during testing was practically identical to that of the traditional shaping. There is the same dense nature to things across a broader margin of the face that you get in the other model, but here the added groove extension takes it up a notch for those that may visit the toe every now and again.
While the feel is excellent, it is the C-Grind here that shined the most during testing. You see, this is the most evolved and versatile grind that this reviewer has tested on any Cleveland cavity back wedge yet. The softer leading edge helps get into the turf, but that rear crescent provided a lot more greenside versatility than in the past.

While they have always been good from bunkers, it was the tight greenside lies that surprised the most, allowing a shocking amount of versatility in a wildly more forgiving design than the standard RTZ. As was with the 50, you can see in the data here that spin was not an issue, hitting right around 9,000 RPM on average for full swings. From full swings to those 75 yard shots, the ability to take dead aim at targets is certainly all there.
Head to Head – CBZ Wedge vs RTZ Wedge
Of course, we also know that it is natural to be a bit skeptical of big changes, and to some people the idea of a cavity back wedge in their bag is indeed a substantial change. Often times the reasoning for not giving a design like the CBZ wedge a chance comes back to the notion that they will launch too high, spin too little, or not offer the same level of consistency. To put that to the test, during the data collection for this review, numbers on the 50 and 54 degree CBZ’s were also recorded.

When taking a look at the averages above, no doubt that some will hyper-fixate on the spin being lower in the CBZ wedge, but in doing so miss the big picture. What exactly is that? It is that the differences are much more minor than most would ever have believed coming into this comparison. In fact, the variance is so minor it might just surprise you when stepping back to see the overall picture the data is painting. The reality is not as much is being left out there as some want to believe, especially when you then add in the increased playability on shots all across the face with the CBZ’s.
The Details – CBZ Wedge
To be clear, we aren’t sitting here saying that everyone should move to the CBZ wedge, individual fit and needs will always vary based on the golfer as well as skill level. However, it is time for the lack of willingness to try cavity back wedges based on what they used to be, to go away. These are the best iteration yet, and also the most widely playable.
Cleveland Golf offers the CBZ wedge in standard face grooves (44-60 degrees) as well as Full-Face (50-60 degrees) to ensure there is something for everyone. The standard shaft pairing is the KBS Hi Rev 2.0 shaft, though there are graphite KBS options available as well.
The new Cleveland CBZ wedges are priced at $179.99. You can order them directly from Cleveland Golf with full customization options available, and they are also available at retailers worldwide.





[QUOTE=”darthweasel, post: 13712717, member: 32906″]
interested to hear why. I don’t run into a ton of hardpan but sometimes and when I do would rarely want to open the face anyway but would be interested in what you are running into
[/QUOTE]
Because with CB wedges, if you open a little too much, the leading edge of the club comes off the ground. And on hardpan, you will NOT get under the ball, or at least what you think you will! So, I have adapted, and have learned to hit chips with the clubface in normal to slightly open most of the time, and have had success for the most part. If I have hit 10 greenside chips, and wanting to open the face, but didn’t, playing straight up, 7 out of the 10 were decent enough to, at most 2 putt.. I had a few in the beginning that just sailed across the green from 10 yards out! Now, hardly happens, but I don’t open the face, until I am in the sand, or a very lush lie, where success from opening the clubface is the best.. If I am greenside, say 20 ft. to the pin, uphill lie, I just plug it in the side of the greenside mound, with my 58° LW, making sure to strike ball first, but no follow thru. Ball goes up, and distance is determined by how hard I hit it. My playing partners are impressed when I do this, because they struggle to get the ball in the air, and are not sure what to expect if they do it my way.Sometimes I just want to get the ball on the green with some momemtum, and let it roll downhill toward the pin. To each his own. I hope this explained why I don’t open the clubface too much, with a CB club…
I went from a Vokey gap wedge to the CBZ. It has been really nice. Definitely notice the extra forgiveness but would like to bring the ball flight down just a bit. I might tinker with a different shaft. I have a modus 125 laying around. I think that combo could be sweet.
Z-Alloy is the shiz and these look great
[QUOTE=”darthweasel, post: 13712717, member: 32906″]
interested to hear why. I don’t run into a ton of hardpan but sometimes and when I do would rarely want to open the face anyway but would be interested in what you are running into
[/QUOTE]
No problems for me with the CBZs from hardpan. I had a 62 yarder from a rocky hardpan lie to an elevated green today, hit it to 4 feet with my 54° and made the birdie putt.
I don’t open the face on a hardpan lie, that’s asking for trouble. I position the ball forward, hit down on it with the toe down making ball first contact, and count on the loft of the club to get it in the air.
I got em, love the looks. I’ll grip them over the Chrissie break and get on the ST+ hopefully Sunday.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9400306[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full”]9400307[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full”]9400308[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”AuzzieMatt, post: 13714454, member: 54652″]
I got em, love the looks. I’ll grip them over the Chrissie break and get on the ST+ hopefully Sunday.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1766577882384.png”]9400306[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1766577896949.png”]9400307[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1766577909892.png”]9400308[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
[IMG alt=”Thats Nice GIF”]https://media2.giphy.com/media/l0HTYUmU67pLWv1a8/200.gif[/IMG]
[QUOTE=”AuzzieMatt, post: 13714454, member: 54652″]
I got em, love the looks. I’ll grip them over the Chrissie break and get on the ST+ hopefully Sunday.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1766577882384.png”]9400306[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1766577896949.png”]9400307[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1766577909892.png”]9400308[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Nice dude. Looking forward to your thoughts.
This was a really run review to write.
Just have to say again how great the feel is on these wedges. The more I hit them, the more I like them. One of my buddies kept “borrowing” my wedges during our round today and he made the same comments about the feel. He’s already strongly pondering them to replace his current blade wedges after hitting them on the range this morning and during our round. Srixon/Cleveland definitely got it right with the Z-Alloy on these.
I have these and they have been pretty good. But not my fav cleveland wedges. I think I prefer the zip cores to these. I may change the shafts and see if that brings some life. They just feel a little dead and I am not seeing the total performance that I would like..
[QUOTE=”BigMac, post: 13714318, member: 3386″]
No problems for me with the CBZs from hardpan. I had a 62 yarder from a rocky hardpan lie to an elevated green today, hit it to 4 feet with my 54° and made the birdie putt.
I don’t open the face on a hardpan lie, that’s asking for trouble. I position the ball forward, hit down on it with the toe down making ball first contact, and count on the loft of the club to get it in the air.
[/QUOTE]
So the key there is making ball first contact. All good if you can be that precise.
I on the other hand am not. These shots scare me because I can be fat/thin and everything in between.
That said I am still leaning that I go CBZ in the 50° vs RTZ. I full swing 50 alot so it does make sense here.
[QUOTE=”Wonger, post: 13719733, member: 74038″]
So the key there is making ball first contact. All good if you can be that precise.
I on the other hand am not. These shots scare me because I can be fat/thin and everything in between.
[/QUOTE]
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying I can do it all the time. :ROFLMAO: My point was more that I don’t find the CBZs any worse than any other wedge from hardpan lies, which are a tough shot no matter what.
[QUOTE=”Wonger, post: 13719733, member: 74038″]
That said I am still leaning that I go CBZ in the 50° vs RTZ. I full swing 50 alot so it does make sense here.
[/QUOTE]
It does make sense if you full swing the 50° a lot. The extra forgiveness is a big plus.
Took a look at some of these in store today next to the RTZ’s. For the less lofted wedges, the CBZ’s look very nice compared to the RTZ’s. I wouldn’t hesitate to game a CBZ gap wedge (48-50ish).
But the high toe on even the non-full face versions of the high lofted wedges didn’t sit well with my eye. Could I get used to it? Yes, I used to play Ping Eye 2 wedges ?. But it’s just not what I’m looking for in my finesse wedges. But they did a pretty good job of not making the top line look really bulky. I think they’d be very usable for lots of players who need some extra forgiveness on those wedges.
Caught one high on the face with a blade wedge. Came up short.
Made me wonder what it would have been like with this in hand instead.
Quick hitter. Did the wedge matrix on the ST+ yesterday and was really liking the 56° for 3/4 swings to 60 yards.
I need to do more on the sim with these but they are just so easy to hit, this coming season is going to be really good wedge wise, I can feel it.
[QUOTE=”AuzzieMatt, post: 13724096, member: 54652″]
Quick hitter. Did the wedge matrix on the ST+ yesterday and was really liking the 56° for 3/4 swings to 60 yards.
I need to do more on the sim with these but they are just so easy to hit, this coming season is going to be really good wedge wise, I can feel it.
[/QUOTE]
I’m so excited to get these in for my PW and GW for that exact reason. I feel like they are so good for me for partial swings. At least the last two generations were, and everything I’ve read here so far points to this generation will be as well.
[QUOTE=”AuzzieMatt, post: 13724096, member: 54652″]
Quick hitter. Did the wedge matrix on the ST+ yesterday and was really liking the 56° for 3/4 swings to 60 yards.
I need to do more on the sim with these but they are just so easy to hit, this coming season is going to be really good wedge wise, I can feel it.
[/QUOTE]
Any initial thoughts about the feel?
[QUOTE=”BigMac, post: 13724134, member: 3386″]
Any initial thoughts about the feel?
[/QUOTE]
[IMG alt=”I Love You GIF by Sesame Street”]https://media4.giphy.com/media/VIKa3CjZDCoymNcBY5/200.gif[/IMG]
Has anyone made the swap from the CBX4s into the CBZs? Was it a worthy upgrade and does the bounce and grind play identical?
Thanks!
[QUOTE=”ak3putt, post: 13733779, member: 85188″]
Has anyone made the swap from the CBX4s into the CBZs? Was it a worthy upgrade and does the bounce and grind play identical?
Thanks!
[/QUOTE]
I had one generation previous to the 4s and switched so not a perfect comparison for you so sorry, But I think the biggest thing is going to be feel and if you like a softer wedge if you like a softer wedge feel then it probably will be. I find the bounces and grinds to line up well though just tweaked slightly to optimize no dramatic differences there.
Gap went out with me again yesterday for my first round of 26 and it was the same story. High, accurate, and with sticking power.
Great feel that flowed into the RTZ’s just like I remembered when I was working on this review article.
Should have the steel shafts in my cbz switched over to Spinner 80’s this week, going to be fun to see a more dollar-for-dollar comparison once that happens.
Eager to test the CBZs out – they certainly look attractive, I am not a full face guy – but the rest of the set up I could make them work – and who knows, maybe the extra bit of forgiveness would help. Eager to see them at the shop when I get back to golf.
[QUOTE=”JW Smoove, post: 13741468, member: 63219″]
Eager to test the CBZs out – they certainly look attractive, I am not a full face guy – but the rest of the set up I could make them work – and who knows, maybe the extra bit of forgiveness would help. Eager to see them at the shop when I get back to golf.
[/QUOTE]
They’re not all full face. You got options, it’s part of why this release is so well done.
Yes you are right – I should not have said that, I did not mean to suggest they were – that was a poorly written and chosen words – I think I said/thought it after seeing one of the photos – I am most eager to give them a whirl. Thanks for clarifying.
I can’t get over how nice the faces look (the original style 🙂 ) and as I have said for a while the new metalurgy not to mention how, while they are CBs they don’t scream CB as some clubs do.
[QUOTE=”JW Smoove, post: 13741483, member: 63219″]
Yes you are right – I should not have said that, I did not mean to suggest they were – that was a poorly written and chosen words – I think I said/thought it after seeing one of the photos – I am most eager to give them a whirl. Thanks for clarifying.
I can’t get over how nice the faces look (the original style 🙂 ) and as I have said for a while the new metalurgy not to mention how, while they are CBs they don’t scream CB as some clubs do.
[/QUOTE]
FWIW, I don’t care for the full face nearly as much as the standard shaping.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13741488, member: 1579″]
FWIW, I don’t care for the full face nearly as much as the standard shaping.
[/QUOTE]
For me – and I am by no means a classicist when it comes to golf, but there something odd/off – for me when I see a full face grooved club – I fear it could mess with my aim and/or alignment.
[QUOTE=”JW Smoove, post: 13741496, member: 63219″]
For me – and I am by no means a classicist when it comes to golf, but there something odd/off – for me when I see a full face grooved club – I fear it could mess with my aim and/or alignment.
[/QUOTE]
I played a PM Grind and a Jaws Raw Full Toe in the 58° slot prior to the CBZ, so the look is really comfortable to me. I like having that extra real estate on the 58°, but don’t feel the need for it on the 54°.
[QUOTE=”JW Smoove, post: 13741496, member: 63219″]
For me – and I am by no means a classicist when it comes to golf, but there something odd/off – for me when I see a full face grooved club – I fear it could mess with my aim and/or alignment.
[/QUOTE]
When I try to get saucy and open a club face the strike moves high toe and having some groves there would really help. The number of times I hit that shot per round would be like .1 but still nice to have
[QUOTE=”BigMac, post: 13741501, member: 3386″]
I played a PM Grind and a Jaws Raw Full Toe in the 58° slot prior to the CBZ, so the look is really comfortable to me. I like having that extra real estate on the 58°, but don’t feel the need for it on the 54°.
[/QUOTE]
I also carry a 54/58 setup, I have been using the 54 less and less in the sand (and much more around the greens) and the 58 more from the sand and opened up to get over a hazard close in (or short sided). I am not against taking one for a spin – could be a totally different beast in play than in a photo.
[QUOTE=”outlawx, post: 13741504, member: 74252″]
When I try to get saucy and open a club face the strike moves high toe and having some groves there would really help. The number of times I hit that shot per round would be like .1 but still nice to have
[/QUOTE]
I don’t intentionally manipulate the face (too often), I mean I do, just not often. Also, seldom take hard swings with these – so wonder how much they would add – as I said above though, I might take one for a test drive.
[QUOTE=”outlawx, post: 13741504, member: 74252″]
When I try to get saucy and open a club face the strike moves high toe and having some groves there would really help. The number of times I hit that shot per round would be like .1 but still nice to have
[/QUOTE]
I look at it kinda like having 4WD on my truck – I don’t need it very often, but when I do I’m sure glad I have it. ?
[QUOTE=”outlawx, post: 13741504, member: 74252″]
When I try to get saucy and open a club face the strike moves high toe and having some groves there would really help. The number of times I hit that shot per round would be like .1 but still nice to have
[/QUOTE]
Same for me when I open up the face. And it just tends to happen sometimes so having those grooves all the way out there are beneficial. Love having that option for anything 54 and up for me.
[QUOTE=”BigMac, post: 13741524, member: 3386″]
I look at it kinda like having 4WD on my truck – I don’t need it very often, but when I do I’m sure glad I have it. ?
[/QUOTE]
That’s a great way of saying it
I think the potential benefit of going full face in the 58 is the C grind has 10 degrees of bounce, where the 58 C grind in traditional face had 12 degrees of bounce. The reduction in bounce probably makes the full face a little more versatile.
With only having experience in the CBX, I do wish there was slightly less bounce to help lower the leading edge a little, so the 10 degrees on bounce in the full face 58 makes it appealing from a sole perspective. I’m not sure I like the look of the larger head and high tow of the full face, but prefer the sole grind so it’s probably worth a try for me.
Just my buddy and I playing today, he’s been eyeballing my CBZs and has hit them a few times on the range and course. He asked to hit my 54 on an approach shot today and I told him he was welcome to hit them as much as he wanted to. He hit both my 54 and 58 on a few holes, everything from approaches to short chips. He hit some nice shots with them and was amazed at how hard they bite and check up on our unforgiving, rock hard greens.
While we were waiting on the 10th tee, he got online on his phone and ordered a 54 and 58. I guess you could say the CBZs made an impression on him. ?
I am picking up my re-shafted CBZ wedges today, can’t wait to get some swings on them with the new shafts.
Re-shafted CBZ’s are in hand cant wait to get to the sim this weekend and get some swings in with them
‘
I’ve had the 50 back in the bag this week for my times out on course and I still stand by my feedback in the article, these are damn good wedges.
While personally, I don’t get along with the Full Face as much (specifically in the 54, I think in a lob it would be different as I used to play FF/High-Toe wedges there), I think the standard faced versions of these remain freaking brilliant. Spin is there. Launch is there. Playability is 2-3x that of a bladed wedge in terms of the way misses react. Shaping is there. They’re just, really good.
Which makes me wonder again, why won’t some golfers out there give these an honest look? If you have, what pushed you to? If you have not, what’s the story you are running with as to not?
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13761583, member: 1579″]
‘
I’ve had the 50 back in the bag this week for my times out on course and I still stand by my feedback in the article, these are damn good wedges.
While personally, I don’t get along with the Full Face as much (specifically in the 54, I think in a lob it would be different as I used to play FF/High-Toe wedges there), I think the standard faced versions of these remain freaking brilliant. Spin is there. Launch is there. Playability is 2-3x that of a bladed wedge in terms of the way misses react. Shaping is there. They’re just, really good.
Which makes me wonder again, why won’t some golfers out there give these an honest look? If you have, what pushed you to? If you have not, what’s the story you are running with as to not?
[/QUOTE]
I am with you on the last part to be honest I hope a couple of anti CB wedge stall warts get into the Srixon experience so we can watch these wedges win them over because I know it will happen.
I am intrigued on your comments on the 54 as I have been lobing the ff 60 so much I was thinking about grabbing a full face 54 too as I open that for a flop like shot on occasion if there are things I need to make sure I carry in the 35 to 40 yard shot range. it is probably overkill though its just a shot I like form time to time.
[QUOTE=”GolfSquatch, post: 13761599, member: 85082″]
I am with you on the last part to be honest I hope a couple of anti CB wedge stall warts get into the Srixon experience so we can watch these wedges win them over because I know it will happen.
I am intrigued on your comments on the 54 as I have been lobing the ff 60 so much I was thinking about grabbing a full face 54 too as I open that for a flop like shot on occasion if there are things I need to make sure I carry in the 35 to 40 yard shot range. it is probably overkill though its just a shot I like form time to time.
[/QUOTE]
It would be fun.
I’m talking personal visual preference with the 54, you might love it.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13761666, member: 1579″]
It would be fun.
I’m talking personal visual preference with the 54, you might love it.
[/QUOTE]
I want to wait it out till I am actually on grass before I make any more changes (you know what I said I was Goggin to do in the first place then got impatient and said screw it I am buying them)
As good as CBZ wedges feel on steel shafts, on graphite, they are truly a thing of beauty.
I just got my first swings in, and the feel with graphite shafts is absolutely wonderful. I know this may sound like an exaggeration, but the CBZ wedges with the Catalyst 80 Spinner shafts honestly feel like hitting a soft forged wedge. In fact, I think they feel better than the last “high-quality” blade wedge I hit, which was a Vokey SM10.
If they were buttery smooth before, the graphite shafts take them to another level—full-on [I]smooth as silk[/I].
Hit some full 54 and 50 degree wedge shots and improved over the CBX version.
50 Degree: Purple is CBZ
[ATTACH type=”full”]9404078[/ATTACH]
54 Degree Orange is CBZ
[ATTACH type=”full”]9404080[/ATTACH]
Best part is I am also still seeing the significant spin gain for the CBZ (in fact, it is even a touch better) with the graphite shafts
The partial shots also seem more controlled. I chipped in two during my sim round with the CBZ 60 degree with the new shaft.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13761583, member: 1579″]
Playability is 2-3x that of a bladed wedge in terms of the way misses react.
[/QUOTE]
Man this is an incredible thought. I’ve not played CB wedges in forever.
But this makes me that much more eager to hit them, 2-3x better on misses…sign me up.
You all are making my wait more challenging the more this feedback comes in. The pitching wedge was back ordered so I think I will get them sometime next month.
[QUOTE=”JW Smoove, post: 13768063, member: 63219″]
Man this is an incredible thought. I’ve not played CB wedges in forever.
But this makes me that much more eager to hit them, 2-3x better on misses…sign me up.
[/QUOTE]
I couldn’t recommend this style of wedge more. So many shots with the gap wedge, I thought I basically missed that ended up in the heart of the green.
[QUOTE=”GolfSquatch, post: 13768049, member: 85082″]
As good as CBZ wedges feel on steel shafts, on graphite, they are truly a thing of beauty.
I just got my first swings in, and the feel with graphite shafts is absolutely wonderful. I know this may sound like an exaggeration, but the CBZ wedges with the Catalyst 80 Spinner shafts honestly feel like hitting a soft forged wedge. In fact, I think they feel better than the last “high-quality” blade wedge I hit, which was a Vokey SM10.
If they were buttery smooth before, the graphite shafts take them to another level—full-on [I]smooth as silk[/I].
Hit some full 54 and 50 degree wedge shots and improved over the CBX version.
50 Degree: Purple is CBZ
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1768155987948.png”]9404078[/ATTACH]
54 Degree Orange is CBZ
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1768156080812.png”]9404080[/ATTACH]
Best part is I am also still seeing the significant spin gain for the CBZ (in fact, it is even a touch better) with the graphite shafts
The partial shots also seem more controlled. I chipped in two during my sim round with the CBZ 60 degree with the new shaft.
[/QUOTE]
Taper or parallel tip? I need to know so when i makes the jump I’m ready!
[QUOTE=”JW Smoove, post: 13768080, member: 63219″]
Taper or parallel tip? I need to know so when i makes the jump I’m ready!
[/QUOTE]
They’re taper.
I used Cleveland house shafts – Project X Catalyst Spinners, so they are an option you can get with the irons that @PiratePenguin was able to get me. I am 90% sure they are .355 tip size though, so taper tip
Never mind @Jman beat me to it right as I was posting this
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 13768066, member: 62865″]
You all are making my wait more challenging the more this feedback comes in. The pitching wedge was back ordered so I think I will get them sometime next month.
[/QUOTE]
The wait is going to make those first few swings that much more rewarding, and trust me, they won’t let you down
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13768105, member: 1579″]
They’re taper.
[/QUOTE]
From ancient memory i thought that was true, thanks for confirming!
[QUOTE=”GolfSquatch, post: 13768049, member: 85082″]
As good as CBZ wedges feel on steel shafts, on graphite, they are truly a thing of beauty.
I just got my first swings in, and the feel with graphite shafts is absolutely wonderful. I know this may sound like an exaggeration, but the CBZ wedges with the Catalyst 80 Spinner shafts honestly feel like hitting a soft forged wedge. In fact, I think they feel better than the last “high-quality” blade wedge I hit, which was a Vokey SM10.
If they were buttery smooth before, the graphite shafts take them to another level—full-on [I]smooth as silk[/I].
Hit some full 54 and 50 degree wedge shots and improved over the CBX version.
50 Degree: Purple is CBZ
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1768155987948.png”]9404078[/ATTACH]
54 Degree Orange is CBZ
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1768156080812.png”]9404080[/ATTACH]
Best part is I am also still seeing the significant spin gain for the CBZ (in fact, it is even a touch better) with the graphite shafts
The partial shots also seem more controlled. I chipped in two during my sim round with the CBZ 60 degree with the new shaft.
[/QUOTE]
I didn’t try the CBZs with steel so I can’t directly compare, but I ordered mine with 65g Recoil Darts and love the feel. Very smooth/soft, but feels solid at the same time.
Your observation vs Vokeys seems to be on target – my buddy who tried mine and bought a set the other day has been playing graphite shafted Vokeys for several years and he commented on how plush the CBZs feel.