Are you a short game wizard? The type of player which demands maximum versatility in order to command the highest level of precision into and around the greens?
The safe bet for most of us mere mortals kicking it around our local courses and muni’s is the answer to that is a pretty quick no. If you are, however, a master of all things short game then feel free to dive into any one of our thousands of other articles as this one may not be for you.
This review is about breaking down walls and preconceptions via the cavity back wedge, and no one has been committed to doing just that as much as Cleveland Golf has. So, when we got the chance to get both versions of their new CBZ wedge design which has evolved the concept inside and out, we naturally wanted to bring all the info and feedback to each and every one of you.

Quick Take
Without a doubt, the best cavity back wedge design yet from Cleveland Golf. Yes, the biggest star is the implementation of Z-Alloy into cavity driven wedge design, but that was simply the start. From a feedback perspective, both the standard and full-face high-toe versions are excellent, providing a feel which flows seamlessly into and with the companies RTZ’s. More importantly though, the emphasis on face design as well as sole grind makes them possibly most versatile cavity back wedge on the market.
Filling the Wedgucational Cavity
Sure, that title is a bit on the campy side of things, but there will be no apologies as it sums up what not only Cleveland, but every single golf manufacturer out there is facing when it comes to getting people to try a more forgiving wedge. Clearly, there is a disconnect when 87% of golfers are playing an iron which emphasizes forgiveness, but most continue to automatically put a set of bladed wedges into the bag without consideration of what one, or more, cavity driven designs could provide for them on the course.
In that battle, however, Cleveland Golf has led the charge in trying to get golfers to think of their wedges in the same way that they do their irons. Sure, it is a shot across the bow at how most of us select our wedges, most of the time just opting for what we do out of habit or fear of change more than anything else. But the goal is to break down barriers, and just as once upon a time cavity back irons were seen as blasphemous to traditionalists for fears of sacrificing versatility and workability, wedges are currently undergoing that same battle.

Although they were not the first to do a cavity back wedge design, Cleveland Golf has certainly been the most committed to not only offering them but continuing to innovate and evolve the concept. The company dipped their toes into the water way back into the CG wedge era, but it was with the CBX in 2017 that they jumped all the way into the deep end. Since then, there have been multiple iterations and evolutions with many receiving extremely positive feedback from golfers everywhere. This year, however, marked the first version of the CBZ wedge.
When Cleveland Golf announced their release of the RTZ bladed wedges driven by an all new base material that they created with Z-Alloy (you can read about that here) we here at THP couldn’t help but think about other prospective applications. Sure, many minds went right to irons, but the potential impact into their cavity back wedges was clear given what the material does in terms of not only feel and durability, but mass savings.

So, the company went to work, redesigning the concept, and creating the CBZ. With a 94% larger Gelback TPU internal insert combined with the benefits of Z-Alloy, these wedges look to bring not just better feel to the table but also increased spin consistency and efficiency as well. As if that wasn’t enough, heavy attention also went into the looks and sole grind options available.
We got each in hand for a closer look and put both the 50V (Standard) and 54C (Full Face) through their paces.
Cleveland CBZ 50V
Visually, the standard groove models of the CBZ’s are check all of the boxed. At setup, it doesn’t look like a cavity back and the overall shaping hides everything incredibly well with the topline, leading edge, as well as hosel transition looking very much like a standard Cleveland wedge. Add in the aggressive face/groove milling, and when you put it down next to a 50 degree RTZ, it was nearly impossible to differentiate.


Beyond that, the performance here was stellar. With it being a gap wedge loft, it was fun to be able to treat it as both a full swing wedge as well as still using it for pitches and chips. The V-Grind takes material from both the leading and trail edges to allow for enough bounce to bring more forgiveness but preventing any digging into and out of the soil on full swings.
The feedback through impact was shockingly good, the slightest bit more muted than the RTZ’s are for this reviewer, but the closest to their flagship wedge line that Cleveland Golf has gotten so far. You do keep a “good” feel across more of the face than the RTZ, which is what should happen.

As you can see in the data below, speed nor launch was an issue, and the overall spin on both full and 50 yard shots made for impressive precision with no issues at all holding greens. Honestly, even if you don’t want to give up the versatility of a bladed wedge in sand and lob lofts, the CBZ in a gap wedge is well worth trying, especially if you ever use that club on full swings.
Cleveland Golf CBZ 54C Full Face
While the company is declaring the Full Face as an additional offering within the core CBZ wedge lineup, it is still a different animal in a few ways. Foremost, visually, the size here is notably bigger, which is expected given the Full Face grooves, but it is the altered High Toe shaping which really shifts things.
Now, that does not mean it is bad, quite the opposite actually as like its sibling, every radius on each clubhead makes for a fantastic visual. Unsurprisingly, if you like the High Toe and Full Face look, you will love this, if you prefer the traditional shaping, then it may not be your cup of tea.


In terms of feel/sound, the Full Face feedback during testing was practically identical to that of the traditional shaping. There is the same dense nature to things across a broader margin of the face that you get in the other model, but here the added groove extension takes it up a notch for those that may visit the toe every now and again.
While the feel is excellent, it is the C-Grind here that shined the most during testing. You see, this is the most evolved and versatile grind that this reviewer has tested on any Cleveland cavity back wedge yet. The softer leading edge helps get into the turf, but that rear crescent provided a lot more greenside versatility than in the past.

While they have always been good from bunkers, it was the tight greenside lies that surprised the most, allowing a shocking amount of versatility in a wildly more forgiving design than the standard RTZ. As was with the 50, you can see in the data here that spin was not an issue, hitting right around 9,000 RPM on average for full swings. From full swings to those 75 yard shots, the ability to take dead aim at targets is certainly all there.
Head to Head – CBZ Wedge vs RTZ Wedge
Of course, we also know that it is natural to be a bit skeptical of big changes, and to some people the idea of a cavity back wedge in their bag is indeed a substantial change. Often times the reasoning for not giving a design like the CBZ wedge a chance comes back to the notion that they will launch too high, spin too little, or not offer the same level of consistency. To put that to the test, during the data collection for this review, numbers on the 50 and 54 degree CBZ’s were also recorded.

When taking a look at the averages above, no doubt that some will hyper-fixate on the spin being lower in the CBZ wedge, but in doing so miss the big picture. What exactly is that? It is that the differences are much more minor than most would ever have believed coming into this comparison. In fact, the variance is so minor it might just surprise you when stepping back to see the overall picture the data is painting. The reality is not as much is being left out there as some want to believe, especially when you then add in the increased playability on shots all across the face with the CBZ’s.
The Details – CBZ Wedge
To be clear, we aren’t sitting here saying that everyone should move to the CBZ wedge, individual fit and needs will always vary based on the golfer as well as skill level. However, it is time for the lack of willingness to try cavity back wedges based on what they used to be, to go away. These are the best iteration yet, and also the most widely playable.
Cleveland Golf offers the CBZ wedge in standard face grooves (44-60 degrees) as well as Full-Face (50-60 degrees) to ensure there is something for everyone. The standard shaft pairing is the KBS Hi Rev 2.0 shaft, though there are graphite KBS options available as well.
The new Cleveland CBZ wedges are priced at $179.99. You can order them directly from Cleveland Golf with full customization options available, and they are also available at retailers worldwide.





[QUOTE=”JTinMO, post: 13856983, member: 68067″]
You are going to get to try it out soon on the CBZ’s. You may have to do some hose or lawn sprinkler testing.
[/QUOTE]
Nah. I trust the science.
[QUOTE=”JTinMO, post: 13854437, member: 68067″]
They must have got a large shipment in, as my options are now showing in stock on the site. They have been greyed out for at least the prior month and a half.
I hope that means there will be more options available at retail as well. I looked for these two weeks ago and no lefty options were in the store.
[/QUOTE]
If you’re still having trouble finding lefty models. Check with our friend [USER=42778]@Lougle[/USER] at World Wide Golf. Seems that they have all the options in stock for us lefties. 😉
[QUOTE=”robrandalgz, post: 13857017, member: 44393″]
If you’re still having trouble finding lefty models. Check with our friend [USER=42778]@Lougle[/USER] at World Wide Golf. Seems that they have all the options in stock for us lefties. 😉
[/QUOTE]
They were updated as in stock in the last day. The 52 and 58 models have been an issue for the last 2 months that I’ve been checking.
[QUOTE=”JTinMO, post: 13856346, member: 68067″]
Tried to find these again locally and completely struck out for anything lefty. The RH versions are plentiful and look great.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_1364.jpeg”]9412723[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_1365.jpeg”]9412726[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Where did you find that variety of these wedges, Dicks, close to me , has 5 in total and most are the same loft.
[QUOTE=”mav52, post: 13857324, member: 69967″]
Where did you find that variety of these wedges, Dicks, close to me , has 5 in total and most are the same loft.
[/QUOTE]
PGA Superstore (St Louis area)
[QUOTE=”Chow, post: 13856483, member: 80528″]
I second hydrazip.
My 60 has it and my 56 was an older zip core that didn’t.
I play almost exclusively early mornings. All of a sudden my pitch shots and chips were checking up when I had zero expectation of them doing so. Since then I’m a huge believer in Hydrazip.
[/QUOTE]
I actually tested it by spraying water on wedge faces and hitting balls on a launch monitor. It was really cool. Aside from the added spin, there was a ton more consistency in back to front distance.
I have these wedges and haven’t participated much in this thread. To be fair, I’ve only had them about a month and only a couple of rounds on them but I’ve hit two of the best wedges I’ve hit in a while in my short time with them.
I have experience with this type of profile as I played almost every iteration of the CBX line. There IS something different about these wedges (without going into the technology). They absolutely feel softer than previous versions (I might be weird but I think I can hear it also). The metallurgy is real. It’s probably the fact that I just got a wedge refresh but I am noticing more bite on shorter chips. I’ve never been a guy who was able to spin it back but on full shots (which I DO use because I have some yardages dialed with them) but these stop and drop with zero issues. Other than a chunked shot, I haven’t had a full shot wedge stop any farther than about a foot and a half from my pitch mark (and most shorter than that).
Haven’t really had the opportunity to test out the Hydrazip feature but someone asked about the milling on the toe of the standard wedge. I can’t give any actual data to support but, in my experience, the milling absolutely helps generate some spin as opposed to a wedge without it. The turf interaction with these (for me) is unbeatable. I would never be able to play a traditional blade wedge the way that I play these clubs. I’m just not good enough. The bounce profile from my 50-58 is perfect for me (I play 50, 54, 58). They put a lot of thought into the bounces for each specific wedge in these sets and I think they nailed it. Feel free to ask any questions if I can help.
[QUOTE=”robrandalgz, post: 13857362, member: 44393″]
I have these wedges and haven’t participated much in this thread. To be fair, I’ve only had them about a month and only a couple of rounds on them but I’ve hit two of the best wedges I’ve hit in a while in my short time with them.
I have experience with this type of profile as I played almost every iteration of the CBX line. There IS something different about these wedges (without going into the technology). They absolutely feel softer than previous versions (I might be weird but I think I can hear it also). The metallurgy is real. It’s probably the fact that I just got a wedge refresh but I am noticing more bite on shorter chips. I’ve never been a guy who was able to spin it back but on full shots (which I DO use because I have some yardages dialed with them) but these stop and drop with zero issues. Other than a chunked shot, I haven’t had a full shot wedge stop any farther than about a foot and a half from my pitch mark (and most shorter than that).
Haven’t really had the opportunity to test out the Hydrazip feature but someone asked about the milling on the toe of the standard wedge. I can’t give any actual data to support but, in my experience, the milling absolutely helps generate some spin as opposed to a wedge without it. The turf interaction with these (for me) is unbeatable. I would never be able to play a traditional blade wedge the way that I play these clubs. I’m just not good enough. The bounce profile from my 50-58 is perfect for me (I play 50, 54, 58). They put a lot of thought into the bounces for each specific wedge in these sets and I think they nailed it. Feel free to ask any questions if I can help.
[/QUOTE]
That’s all great feedback, especially on the feel and spin.
I haven’t been super active in this thread but I’ve been gaming a 48* as my gap wedge for about 4 months now and it has really become a trusted club for me. I carry it around 125-130 and have gained a ton of confidence with that distance. I like the extra forgiveness I get out of this as I only use it for full swings. Don’t think I would be nearly as comfortable with a blade style wedge in this spot of my bag.
[IMG alt=”Angry Kick GIF by TRT”]https://media3.giphy.com/media/gwf9QP2mwm9DxATtTh/200.gif[/IMG]
[QUOTE=”PhillyV, post: 13861700, member: 6890″]
[IMG alt=”Angry Kick GIF by TRT”]https://media3.giphy.com/media/gwf9QP2mwm9DxATtTh/200.gif[/IMG]
[/QUOTE]
I’m sure you’re getting details now or soon, but do you have specific lofts in mind for your testing?
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13861716, member: 1193″]
I’m sure you’re getting details now or soon, but do you have specific lofts in mind for your testing?
[/QUOTE]
A big part of me wanted to go 54/60 and shift that 54 to more of a full swing only club, but the experience last month has me wanting to commit to 56/60 and using the 56 around the green more. Plus I have always had 56/60, so it would allow me to give feedback on shots that I would be familiar with. So I went with 56/60.
[QUOTE=”PhillyV, post: 13861726, member: 6890″]
A big part of me wanted to go 54/60 and shift that 54 to more of a full swing only club, but the experience last month has me wanting to commit to 56/60 and using the 56 around the green more. Plus I have always had 56/60, so it would allow me to give feedback on shots that I would be familiar with. So I went with 56/60.
[/QUOTE]
Very nice. You could always bend I’m sure if you want to, but I think those lofts will be really fun for you, especially in the conditions we see up here.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13861742, member: 1193″]
Very nice. You could always bend I’m sure if you want to, but I think those lofts will be really fun for you, especially in the conditions we see up here.
[/QUOTE]
For sure. Im really excited because even around here, wedges can get a lot of work
CBZ 52 and 58 wedges are ordered. I know I’m not going to hold off all year for these, so found a good deal and purchased. I should have them reshafted and ready to hit next week.
I think I’m going to pull the trigger on these too. Waffling on 54/58, 52/58 or 52/56. I’ve always gone 54/58 but I’m not really worried about gapping full shots. Really just what works best inside 50-75.
[QUOTE=”Joshnoble01, post: 13862287, member: 53518″]
I think I’m going to pull the trigger on these too. Waffling on 54/58, 52/58 or 52/56. I’ve always gone 54/58 but I’m not really worried about gapping full shots. Really just what works best inside 50-75.
[/QUOTE]
For the last year i’ve played 52/58 (really 53/58) and it’s worked out well. I use the 58 for everything 60 yards and in. And the 53 for everything from 65-105 yards. I used to be 50-54-58, but found i was a little redundant there.
[IMG alt=”Its Me Hello GIF”]https://media2.giphy.com/media/6EDGSznQA5kVCa0DfD/200.gif[/IMG]
I can’t wait for this!
I’ve been trying to get a 48* , an email to Cleveland notes, short supply, in production.
[QUOTE=”PhillyV, post: 13861726, member: 6890″]
A big part of me wanted to go 54/60 and shift that 54 to more of a full swing only club, but the experience last month has me wanting to commit to 56/60 and using the 56 around the green more. Plus I have always had 56/60, so it would allow me to give feedback on shots that I would be familiar with. So I went with 56/60.
[/QUOTE]
I love reading this! Can’t wait to hear your feedback!
[QUOTE=”Joshnoble01, post: 13862287, member: 53518″]
I think I’m going to pull the trigger on these too. Waffling on 54/58, 52/58 or 52/56. I’ve always gone 54/58 but I’m not really worried about gapping full shots. Really just what works best inside 50-75.
[/QUOTE]
From what I read, you will not be disappointed!
[USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] what surprised you the most about these?!
I haven’t tried the CBZs yet, that changes soon, but I won a set of RTZs on an instagram giveaway ane those wedges are fantastic! I think they’re better than my SM10s. I am looking foreward to trying the CBZs.
[QUOTE=”hadi05, post: 13863557, member: 50784″]
[USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] what surprised you the most about these?!
[/QUOTE]
I got into it pretty deep in the review article itself….
But, spin production and spin consistency
[QUOTE=”mav52, post: 13863343, member: 69967″]
I’ve been trying to get a 48* , an email to Cleveland notes, short supply, in production.
[/QUOTE]
World Wide Golf has them in stock (assuming you’re a righty). I’m sure [USER=42778]@Lougle[/USER] would be happy to help you out……….. 🤷♂️
Thanks my closest store is about 70-80 miles from me in both directions. Jacksonville and the Villages and I'm not driving down I-4 to Orlando :ROFLMAO:
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13863566, member: 1579″]
I got into it pretty deep in the review article itself….
But, spin production and spin consistency
[/QUOTE]
I did read the article. It’s a great one honestly. I think you provided much more detail than the OEM did on their website.
I’ve never played a cavity back wedge, because it lacked in the feel department and many times they felt too light. I’m sure this will change.
Thanks for your feedback!
[QUOTE=”hadi05, post: 13863676, member: 50784″]
I did read the article. It’s a great one honestly. I think you provided much more detail than the OEM did on their website.
I’ve never played a cavity back wedge, because it lacked in the feel department and many times they felt too light. I’m sure this will change.
Thanks for your feedback!
[/QUOTE]
Feel won’t be an issue here, the material combined with the iterations that Cleveland has had to really nail the shaping and dampening effects stands out.
This testing should convert people.
They’re really good.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 13863712, member: 1579″]
Feel won’t be an issue here, the material combined with the iterations that Cleveland has had to really nail the shaping and dampening effects stands out.
This testing should convert people.
They’re really good.
[/QUOTE]
This is 💯 what I’m excited about! Feel and dampening! CB wedge typically struggle mightily in those categories.
Based on my experiences with the prior CBX wedges, feel and dampening are not the selling point. Yes they feel good, and solid. That's true. The key performance aspect for me was distance control. If you struggle with consistent partial wedge contact, these are excellent.
I don't fire at pins. I'm not that guy. I want a decent shot at a putt for par. The CBX wedges helped get me on the green much more consistently. My misses are much more playable with the cavity back wedges.
I’ll be interested to see how partial wedge shots improve for me with these.
Thank you for that feedback!!!
[QUOTE=”mav52, post: 13864107, member: 69967″]
48.12 ????? I’ll have to go look after I get back from 3 week vacation, starting today at 4pm
[/QUOTE]
Yes. I believe 48.12 is the only bounce option available in the 48*.
[QUOTE=”mav52, post: 13864107, member: 69967″]
48.12 ????? I’ll have to go look after I get back from 3 week vacation, starting today at 4pm
[/QUOTE]
This is the one I’m getting. Hoping it’s going to be the gap wedge for me. I want specialty wedge grind with set wedge forgiveness
[QUOTE=”outlawx, post: 13864116, member: 74252″]
This is the one I’m getting. Hoping it’s going to be the gap wedge for me. I want specialty wedge grind with set wedge forgiveness
[/QUOTE]
Same for me, with my Elytes trying to work on a a larger gap between my 42*PW and my 54* SW without have to cart around a 47* AW and a 51* GW,. No harm in giving it a go, except $.
Distance control with the CBZs is pretty amazing. My lateral dispersion isn't great, owing to my inconsistent swing, but I can stand on the range and drop ball after ball at the same distance with these. Considering that I explore the clubface pretty thoroughly, the forgiveness is impressive.
Had a highlight reel shot with the CBZ 54°S in my round yesterday – put my tee shot in the water on a par 3, and my drop was 40 yards from the pin. Hit a pitch with the 54°S and jarred it on a one-hop to save par.
I haven’t been as excited about wedges in quite a while, as I am now waiting for the CBZs to arrive. They are scheduled for delivery Friday, and I have the grips and shafts ready. Barring any unforeseen schedule changes, they should be getting epoxy curing in them saturday morning.
[QUOTE=”JTinMO, post: 13866191, member: 68067″]
I haven’t been as excited about wedges in quite a while, as I am now waiting for the CBZs to arrive. They are scheduled for delivery Friday, and I have the grips and shafts ready. Barring any unforeseen schedule changes, they should be getting epoxy curing in them saturday morning.
[/QUOTE]
Excited to hear how they work for you. Im pumped as well
[QUOTE=”PhillyV, post: 13866210, member: 6890″]
Excited to hear how they work for you. Im pumped as well
[/QUOTE]
We can have a CBZ chip off at Briggs!
[QUOTE=”mav52, post: 13864107, member: 69967″]
48.12 ????? I’ll have to go look after I get back from a 3 week vacation, starting today at 4pm
[/QUOTE]
Don’t get too caught up in the bounce number – look at where they put the relief, if any – heel, toe, trailing edge
[QUOTE=”Desmond, post: 13866264, member: 24109″]
Don’t get too caught up in the bounce number – look at where they put the relief, if any – heel, toe, trailing edge
[/QUOTE]
This is a 💯 true statement!
Pretty excited to put these in play. Currently gaming the cbx zipcores. Very curious about the z alloy
[QUOTE=”hadi05, post: 13866605, member: 50784″]
This is a 💯 true statement!
[QUOTE=”Hibs, post: 13866611, member: 59872″]
Pretty excited to put these in play. Currently gaming the cbx zipcores. Very curious about the z alloy
[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]
So what are your wedge games like. What are you looking to improve in your game?
[QUOTE=”outlawx, post: 13866625, member: 74252″]
So what are your wedge games like. What are you looking to improve in your game?
[/QUOTE]
You’re asking a lot of good questions lately. I like it.
So the cbx have a pretty harsh feel to me. Hoping for a slightly softer feel.
I went with a direct replacement of my 50° and 54°.
I only use my 50 for full shots, but my 54 is probably my most used club aside from the putter. I use it from like 105 in.
I went with full face on the 54 because I tend to miss out towards the toe, on partial swings – and hoping the full face will allow me to flight full shots down a bit when I need to.
Honestlyy short game is probably the strongest part of my game right now…but it definitely isn’t ‘strong’ in the traditional sense.
[QUOTE=”Hibs, post: 13866646, member: 59872″]
You’re asking a lot of good questions lately. I like it.
So the cbx have a pretty harsh feel to me. Hoping for a slightly softer feel.
I went with a direct replacement of my 50° and 54°.
I only use my 50 for full shots, but my 54 is probably my most used club aside from the putter. I use it from like 105 in.
I went with full face on the 54 because I tend to miss out towards the toe, on partial swings – and hoping the full face will allow me to flight full shots down a bit when I need to.
Honestlyy short game is probably the strongest part of my game right now…but it definitely isn’t ‘strong’ in the traditional sense.
[/QUOTE]
Do you keep a lob wedge in the bag too?
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13866648, member: 1193″]
Do you keep a lob wedge in the bag too?
[/QUOTE]
I do. I have a cbx full face that I use primarily in bunkers and when I’m really short sided
[QUOTE=”Hibs, post: 13866650, member: 59872″]
I do. I have a cbx full face that I use primarily in bunkers and when I’m really short sided
[/QUOTE]
Nice. I like that you’re familiar with the platform. I thought there was a solid step up in feel between CBX2 and CB4. With the new material I have a feeling you’ll really see a big difference.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 13866653, member: 1193″]
Nice. I like that you’re familiar with the platform. I thought there was a solid step up in feel between CBX2 and CB4. With the new material I have a feeling you’ll really see a big difference.
[/QUOTE]
Great to hear.
And if I’m not mistaken, the sole has been revamped too?
[QUOTE=”Hibs, post: 13866655, member: 59872″]
Great to hear.
And if I’m not mistaken, the sole has been revamped too?
[/QUOTE]
You know, I just don’t recall the exact progression of the sole geometry enough to expand on that. I really liked what they did with CBX4 though. There’s enough relief in the higher lofts that you can open them in most conditions. The leading edge seems to have a little relief to assist with heavy contact too.
[QUOTE=”outlawx, post: 13866625, member: 74252″]
So what are your wedge games like. What are you looking to improve in your game?
[/QUOTE]
My wedge game is decent. However, ball striking could improve and so could turf interaction on various shots. I have some days where I stick it close and others where it looks like I’ve never used a wedge before.
I’m hoping to see a little more consistency in spin, distance and turf interaction.
I have a 54*, 58* and 60* bent to 62*. My 54 and 60 are most commonly used.
[QUOTE=”Hibs, post: 13866646, member: 59872″]
You’re asking a lot of good questions lately. I like it.
So the cbx have a pretty harsh feel to me. Hoping for a slightly softer feel.
I went with a direct replacement of my 50° and 54°.
I only use my 50 for full shots, but my 54 is probably my most used club aside from the putter. I use it from like 105 in.
I went with full face on the 54 because I tend to miss out towards the toe, on partial swings – and hoping the full face will allow me to flight full shots down a bit when I need to.
Honestlyy short game is probably the strongest part of my game right now…but it definitely isn’t ‘strong’ in the traditional sense.
[/QUOTE]
Do you open the face any for shots around the green?