Terry Koehler has always been on the forefront of wedge design when it comes to the role of weight and its placement within the clubhead. Earlier this year when THP was able to review Edison Golf’s 2.0 wedges (here: Edison 2.0 Wedges Review – The Hackers Paradise) it was the perfect example of the importance of how mass can drastically impact the playability. In our review, the control afforded by the raised mass showed out just as much as the patented “Koehler Sole”, making the 2.0’s some of the most accurate wedges we have worked with.
Fast forward to present day, and OEM’s are raising the mass in wedges to more significant degrees than they have in the past, into the realm of what Edison has been doing all along. Although the methods with which those companies are doing it certainly differ from these, it is enough we thought it worth a little revisit to the Edison 2.0 wedges.

Edison 2.0 Wedges – Revisited
One of the big reasons for wanting to come back around and put the 2.0’s back into play was a lot of recent time spent with some premium wedge designs recently released by a major OEM who has brought the extremely raised CG story to the masses. Depending on the golfer, the performance benefits by moving mass like that in the wedge head can be significant. For example, in my own game, I tend to hit my highest lofted scoring wedges extremely high. Obviously, that has its benefits, but it also costs me at times both with the wind I play in and in general.

So, the raised mass story of the Edison wedges was always an interesting one to me. Terry Koehler has a way of thinking outside the box when it comes to trends versus real performance benefits for average everyday golfers. With the 1.0, I came away thinking that it was a pretty typical Koehler design in the vein of what I had experienced with Eidolon, SCOR, and even Hogan during his time there. However, it was during the review of the 2.0’s that things got a bit more clear.

To be honest, putting the Edison 2.0’s back in the bag was just like I remembered. While they aren’t going to win any beauty pageants, they are a meticulously designed wedge with one of the most compact profiles out there. In the lob and sand wedge spots, I didn’t miss a beat coming from a different higher CG wedge, things remained flatter and much more controlled. The cool thing that continues to separate the 2.0’s is the ability to play such a design down to 45-degrees.

That is where the design really seems to shine the most, offering flatter and more predictable flights while also featuring the Koehler Sole (V-Sole) that allows for consistently clean turf interaction regardless of the lie. If there is a drawback, it might be that in the higher lofts you aren’t going to get the exotic grinds or amounts of relief that other specialty wedges afford you, but to Edison this is about making the most playable and straight forward wedge designs they can. That isn’t to say they can’t be manipulated, as they can, but not to the degree that some might be used to.

All in all, we aren’t going to inundate you with data in this one, for that you can reference back to our previously linked initial review. The purpose of this article is more to the point of making it clear just how relevant and effective these wedges are, even as we work our way into yet another OEM release cycle. Are the Edison 2.0’s for everyone? Of course not, nothing fits everyone, but there certainly are a lot of golfers who could enjoy the repeatability and consistency which Edison has captured here.
The Details
The Edison Golf 2.0 wedges are available in odd numbered lofts from 45 to 59 degrees. The offering of only odd numbered lofts further differentiates Edison, but it also helps control inventory as you canrequest even numbered lofts which will be met by adjusting odd numbered heads. The Edison 2.0 wedges are available now from www.edisonwedges.com and are priced at $199.95 (steel) and $214.95 (graphite) with various shaft options available.
Fun reminiscing about Koehler
I love that V Sole so much – makes me miss my SCORs
That’s a good looking wedge in my eyes….
I purchased a 2.0 58* a few weeks ago. After a couple of sessions at the range and a couple of rounds I just ordered a 54* and 50*. Tracked my shots at the range with my Rapsodo. Compared with my CBX Zipcore Edison’s performance claims were verified.
[QUOTE=”cnl390, post: 12579306, member: 59933″]
I purchased a 2.0 58* a few weeks ago. After a couple of sessions at the range and a couple of rounds I just ordered a 54* and 50*. Tracked my shots at the range with my Rapsodo. Compared with my CBX Zipcore Edison’s performance claims were verified.
[/QUOTE]
Very nice! I look forward to hearing more when the 50 and 54 come in!
Kinda missing my Edisons. I had to move on due to other review commitments, but for various reasons wouldn’t mind giving them another go.
Glad to see these highlighted again, because I really believe they can help the average golfer score better. If you’re on the fence with these, give them a go, you will be pleasantly surprised!
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12579321, member: 1579″]
Very nice! I look forward to hearing more when the 50 and 54 come in!
[/QUOTE]
As soon as they arrive I will do a range session. I’ll use the Rapsodo with balls found on the course that I marked up with an RPT template. Different brands and models, but still should get some good numbers to compare against my Clevelands
How would you say these compare to the old scores? Specifically asking about bounce & turf interaction. I liked the feel of the score’s, but always felt like they played as a low effective bounce type wedge, which wasn’t best for me especially in wet conditions. I’ve had my eye on these, but if they play as “low bounce” I don’t think they would fit my game.
[QUOTE=”Alan4014, post: 12579758, member: 12709″]
How would you say these compare to the old scores? Specifically asking about bounce & turf interaction. I liked the feel of the score’s, but always felt like they played as a low effective bounce type wedge, which wasn’t best for me especially in wet conditions. I’ve had my eye on these, but if they play as “low bounce” I don’t think they would fit my game.
[/QUOTE]
I still have a full set of Scor wedges and love to put them back in play, however, technology these days in the bounce of wedges is key. From the looks of it, and [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] may correct me here, but the Edison 2.0 wedges and the v-sole that will allow for better turf interaction and be a bit more forgiving from various lies than the Scor wedges were.
Hey guys, this is Terry Koehler. The comparison to the SCOR wedges is valid, but I continued to make improvements to the sole versatility over those past dozen years. I think you will find the Edison wedges to be a bit more forgiving and versatile.
Played my first round with the Edison wedges. I’m going to reserve judgment since it’s only one round. But I can say that all my strikes were right on. No chunks or thins. Nice high, straight shots. Even holed out a 22 yard pitch to an elevated green.
The 12th man has arrived…
[ATTACH type=”full”]9304489[/ATTACH]
I have the 52, and love it. Just don’t hit it thin.
[QUOTE=”Bosco…, post: 12687018, member: 65357″]
The 12th man has arrived…
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”FDF33FEB-C3F5-419C-B7E0-921DD907B57A.jpeg”]9304489[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
55?
That’s the one I’ve been considering.
I like V sole wedges , thanks for the revisit.
[QUOTE=”Alan4014, post: 12687186, member: 12709″]
55?
That’s the one I’ve been considering.
[/QUOTE]
Yes sir, it’s going to be a one hit wonder for awhile.
Definitely more compact than Vokey
[ATTACH type=”full”]9304536[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”Bosco…, post: 12687240, member: 65357″]
Yes sir, it’s going to be a one hit wonder for awhile.
[/QUOTE]
I like it. Interested in your thoughts as you put it in play. What are you coming from?
[QUOTE=”Bosco…, post: 12687276, member: 65357″]
Definitely more compact than Vokey
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”5A15DB6E-A538-4627-A12D-014856A5B15F.jpeg”]9304536[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
That’s really interning
[QUOTE=”Alan4014, post: 12687733, member: 12709″]
I like it. Interested in your thoughts as you put it in play. What are you coming from?
[/QUOTE]
Some good feedback in these 2 threads on the Edison 2.0’s if you haven’t already read thru:
[URL unfurl=”true”]https://www.thehackersparadise.com/forum/index.php?threads/introducing-edison-2-0-wedges.8950666/[/URL]
[URL unfurl=”true”]https://www.thehackersparadise.com/forum/index.php?threads/the-pw-challenge.8957135/[/URL]
[QUOTE=”Alan4014, post: 12687733, member: 12709″]
I like it. Interested in your thoughts as you put it in play. What are you coming from?
[/QUOTE]
A pile of crap.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9304573[/ATTACH]
So the wedge rabbit hole began with just wanting some refinishing projects to fiddle with. Then the whole this bounce, that bounce, this loft, that loft, yadda, yadda, yadda.
Basically it just threw in a lot of doubt because no matter what wedge I was using, I was questioning if I should have one of the others instead. I got to thinking I’d probably be better off just staying in the middle of the road. Then [USER=2320]@Canadan[/USER] podcast happened and I heard a lot of what I was thinking and here we are.
My plan is to only carry a PW and this wedge and work more on creating shots.
Will it pan out? Who knows, but I’m going to beat the hell out of this thing.
Made it to the course for a quickie. The ONE f’n day I wanna chip, they had the green closed for repair. Mother f’r.
Opted to tuck my tail and just a small bucket. The grass tee was closed so only mats, double suck.
Anyway, this thing feels pretty dang good. Range balls don’t tell much but it’s pretty consistent. The shaft I picked is the KBS 115g R+. Kind of a tweener. Hard to get decent feedback off mats in my opinion, but I quite like it so far. 18 tomorrow and we’ll see what pans out. I’m not a huge fan of the grip/shape (Lamkin) the texture is great though. That’s just a personal thing, it matters not.
Pay no attention to the offline. Just hitting square off the mat.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9304869[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full”]9304871[/ATTACH]
Played 18 holes of some pretty shitty golf today, maiden voyage for Mr. Ed. A few take aways:
1. Sound and feel with CS is great. Soft off the face, sounds “brighter” than Vokey. If that makes sense.
2. Spin was great. Greens were quite firm and dry today.
3. Turf interaction is interesting. Had a few full shots and the club kinda skated through but the ground is pretty dang firm.
4. I think I like the KBS 115 R+ shaft (?). All I’ve played is Vokey S200 so it’s a bit different. Lots more to do.
5. Yes it’s forgiving high on the face and yes it’s forgiving off the toe. Sucks that I know this.
I didn’t take any full swings before playing, really wanted to just pitch and chip. Did more after the round. Swing/game is a mess, not sure what’s going on. Living out on the toe with the short game and it pisses me off to no end because I “thought” I’d fixed it. Center struck shots were great of course, misses gave me more than I deserved. Few tweaks and I’ll keep going. Grip has got to go, really like them built up on the lower end. Didn’t carry a 60* today and wished I had one on a few holes. Still planning to go one wedge wonder and wring this thing out. Just hard to gauge with so much going wrong.
The polls are closed, I think we have a winner!
Just an update on Eddie Van Wedge 55. Got to the chipping green today and things were MUCH better. A couple videos from Paddy’s Tips kinda got my head straight. Or a little straighter anyway. It’s always the little shit and you have to start at the start.
Went early this morning when things were rather damp and contact was nice, spin putting on the breaks and nice little roll out. I was using the Huge Deal Volviks and quite like them. Feel/sound is so good with this wedge. So not wanting to have too many variables, I went back this afternoon with CS and Volvik hitting the same shots. Maybe more of a “ball review”, but the CS is slightly softer and I think I’m starting to prefer the slightly firmer feel of the Volvik off the wedge. As far as spin I don’t know that I hit enough or am good enough to but I felt like they were pretty close.
This wedge has a feel and sound I love. I did strip off the Lamkin grip. Not a bash because I know they are good and well liked here. It was a little narrow and long for my taste. Put on a standard Royal Mid Taper and all is well in the world. Also did my stupid trick of a piece of round foam backing stuffed about an inch in the shaft. In my head it dampens the vibrations. In reality, who knows. I used to do it on synthetic rifle sticks as well. Anyhoo….
Really like the turf interaction and don’t feel like I’m “wanting bounce” not that I’m even sure anymore. The Koehler sole just glides. I want to get this in some heavier grass….and dare I say I haven’t touched a bunker yet.
If I could ask for one thing…..RAW! I want to gun blue one and monkey with the paint fill so bad.
More to come.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9306847[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”Bosco…, post: 12715353, member: 65357″]
The polls are closed, I think we have a winner!
Just an update on Eddie Van Wedge 55. Got to the chipping green today and things were MUCH better. A couple videos from Paddy’s Tips kinda got my head straight. Or a little straighter anyway. It’s always the little **** and you have to start at the start.
Went early this morning when things were rather damp and contact was nice, spin putting on the breaks and nice little roll out. I was using the Huge Deal Volviks and quite like them. Feel/sound is so good with this wedge. So not wanting to have too many variables, I went back this afternoon with CS and Volvik hitting the same shots. Maybe more of a “ball review”, but the CS is slightly softer and I think I’m starting to prefer the slightly firmer feel of the Volvik off the wedge. As far as spin I don’t know that I hit enough or am good enough to but I felt like they were pretty close.
This wedge has a feel and sound I love. I did strip off the Lamkin grip. Not a bash because I know they are good and well liked here. It was a little narrow and long for my taste. Put on a standard Royal Mid Taper and all is well in the world. Also did my stupid trick of a piece of round foam backing stuffed about an inch in the shaft. In my head it dampens the vibrations. In reality, who knows. I used to do it on synthetic rifle sticks as well. Anyhoo….
Really like the turf interaction and don’t feel like I’m “wanting bounce” not that I’m even sure anymore. The Koehler sole just glides. I want to get this in some heavier grass….and dare I say I haven’t touched a bunker yet.
If I could ask for one thing…..RAW! I want to gun blue one and monkey with the paint fill so bad.
More to come.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”837087EC-6BC3-46A3-9F46-2EEE9C95FB7E.jpeg”]9306847[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Great stuff so far. Glad you’re enjoying them, and can’t wait to hear more.
One question. Can you talk about ball flight compared to other wedges you’ve used?
[QUOTE=”gkeller813, post: 12715500, member: 51675″]
Great stuff so far. Glad you’re enjoying them, and can’t wait to hear more.
One question. Can you talk about ball flight compared to other wedges you’ve used?
[/QUOTE]
I should have more numbers on that, but I don’t. Chipping it seems lower, but I can’t say 100% because I haven’t used another wedge since it arrived. I know it’s supposed to be lower but it’s not something I’ve really been paying attention to. I tend be focused more on spin, contact, and how close I get to the cup.
These numbers are full swing range balls off a mat, for what it’s worth.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9306879[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”Bosco…, post: 12715559, member: 65357″]
I should have more numbers on that, but I don’t. Chipping it seems lower, but I can’t say 100% because I haven’t used another wedge since it arrived. I know it’s supposed to be lower but it’s not something I’ve really been paying attention to. I tend be focused more on spin, contact, and how close I get to the cup.
These numbers are full swing range balls off a mat, for what it’s worth.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”0755F3CB-CCA5-4975-91E2-93ACC528F037.jpeg”]9306879[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Agreed, I too am most worried about consistent distance and being close to the pin!
I started playing in 1990, didn’t play from around 2009-2016, then back at it. All of the “numbers” besides distance (and maybe swing speed), are sort of a new thing for me. It was always “how does the club feel and does it go straight?”
I will say that the sound and feel off this wedge is addictive.
[QUOTE=”Bosco…, post: 12715637, member: 65357″]
I started playing in 1990, didn’t play from around 2009-2016, then back at it. All of the “numbers” besides distance (and maybe swing speed), are sort of a new thing for me. It was always “how does the club feel and does it go straight?”
I will say that the sound and feel off this wedge is addictive.
[/QUOTE]
I see you’ve used the Chromesoft, and agree, the feeling with the CS and Edison wedge is really good.
[QUOTE=”gkeller813, post: 12715648, member: 51675″]
I see you’ve used the Chromesoft, and agree, the feeling with the CS and Edison wedge is really good.
[/QUOTE]
I’m liking it even better with Volvik!
[QUOTE=”Bosco…, post: 12715353, member: 65357″]
The polls are closed, I think we have a winner!
Just an update on Eddie Van Wedge 55. Got to the chipping green today and things were MUCH better. A couple videos from Paddy’s Tips kinda got my head straight. Or a little straighter anyway. It’s always the little **** and you have to start at the start.
Went early this morning when things were rather damp and contact was nice, spin putting on the breaks and nice little roll out. I was using the Huge Deal Volviks and quite like them. Feel/sound is so good with this wedge. So not wanting to have too many variables, I went back this afternoon with CS and Volvik hitting the same shots. Maybe more of a “ball review”, but the CS is slightly softer and I think I’m starting to prefer the slightly firmer feel of the Volvik off the wedge. As far as spin I don’t know that I hit enough or am good enough to but I felt like they were pretty close.
This wedge has a feel and sound I love. I did strip off the Lamkin grip. Not a bash because I know they are good and well liked here. It was a little narrow and long for my taste. Put on a standard Royal Mid Taper and all is well in the world. Also did my stupid trick of a piece of round foam backing stuffed about an inch in the shaft. In my head it dampens the vibrations. In reality, who knows. I used to do it on synthetic rifle sticks as well. Anyhoo….
Really like the turf interaction and don’t feel like I’m “wanting bounce” not that I’m even sure anymore. The Koehler sole just glides. I want to get this in some heavier grass….and dare I say I haven’t touched a bunker yet.
If I could ask for one thing…..RAW! I want to gun blue one and monkey with the paint fill so bad.
More to come.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”837087EC-6BC3-46A3-9F46-2EEE9C95FB7E.jpeg”]9306847[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
They honest to goodness are really damn good wedges that excel in the space they’ve carved out. At setup like that pic, they’re beautiful.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12715754, member: 1579″]
They honest to goodness are really damn good wedges that excel in the space they’ve carved out. At setup like that pic, they’re beautiful.
[/QUOTE]
The back….is the back. You kinda forget about it until you put it in the bag. It is different. Lots of real estate to stamp though.
[QUOTE=”Bosco…, post: 12715761, member: 65357″]
The back….is the back. You kinda forget about it until you put it in the bag. It is different. Lots of real estate to stamp though.
[/QUOTE]
It’s fugly, that’s what it is, hahahaha
But the performance of a TK Wedge is always top tier.
I did have a thought about lofts though. The idea of “we’ll bend it how ever you want” might not sit well with some.
Hear me out.
This wedge seems to be geared towards mid to high handicap players. You’d know better than me, but is this segment the bend it, mess with it, tinker it type? If one wants a brand new 56*, it’s bent and shows up with 55* stamped on it. I’m not sure that it’s not off putting for some. For the crowd here, it’s kind of a normal thing. I just think if I’m looking at two 56* wedges side by side, one says 55 and the other 56, I’m taking the one with 56 on it. I kinda wish the sole was blank and the actual loft was engraved/stamped when you order it. And you know someone would want “59.5*” just for giggles.
Maybe it matters, maybe not.
The only other thing is raw…..I want one raw and gun blue it. Nothing is easier to touch up when it wears. People have different takes on aesthetics though.
[QUOTE=”Bosco…, post: 12715784, member: 65357″]
I did have a thought about lofts though. The idea of “we’ll bend it how ever you want” might not sit well with some.
Hear me out.
This wedge seems to be geared towards mid to high handicap players. You’d know better than me, but is this segment the bend it, mess with it, tinker it type? If one wants a brand new 56*, it’s bent and shows up with 55* stamped on it. I’m not sure that it’s not off putting for some. For the crowd here, it’s kind of a normal thing. I just think if I’m looking at two 56* wedges side by side, one says 55 and the other 56, I’m taking the one with 56 on it. I kinda wish the sole was blank and the actual loft was engraved/stamped when you order it. And you know someone would want “59.5*” just for giggles.
Maybe it matters, maybe not.
The only other thing is raw…..I want one raw and gun blue it. Nothing is easier to touch up when it wears. People have different takes on aesthetics though.
[/QUOTE]
If someone is seeking out Edison, then they’re already doing more homework than most and the bending aspect won’t bother them.
Rae is a durability thing with as soft as the wedges are, TK wants longevity and one SKU. Similarly, inventory control is the reason for bending. TK has done every single loft before with SCOR, and it’s a TON of inventory. With this sole, bending a degree either way doesn’t effect it like a traditional wedge sole.
Sale on demos if anyone is on the fence.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9307479[/ATTACH]
2025 looking good for lefties, ladies, and juniors!
[ATTACH type=”full”]9319372[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full”]9319373[/ATTACH]
I think at this point the only thing keeping me from trying out an Edison wedge is the finish. I just really like a black finish on my wedges especially. The satin is ok, but I don’t love it. Everything else sounds great. Not sure I can overcome that mental hurdle.
[QUOTE=”PiratePenguin, post: 12857418, member: 2635″]
I think at this point the only thing keeping me from trying out an Edison wedge is the finish. I just really like a black finish on my wedges especially. The satin is ok, but I don’t love it. Everything else sounds great. Not sure I can overcome that mental hurdle.
[/QUOTE]
Black would be great!
Passing along this email. I’m thinking about the 59 to finish things off but I’ve got some DIY grinding I’m considering.
Pretty good deal.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9324658[/ATTACH]