Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
After the Barkley workout, I think if the Browns want him, take him at #1 and a QB at #4. Giants aren't gonna pass on him and there will be at least 1 of the top QBs left at #4.
I agree, but Cleveland has the luxury of making sure they get him and still grab their franchise QB.I don’t know. If the Giants covet Rosen, you always pull the trigger on a franchise QB over a franchise RB 100 out of 100 times. I like Barkley as much as the next guy but let’s not forget how many great RB’s come after rounds 2-3. Ultimately I don’t see him dropping out of the top 5.
Sounds like Allen and Mayfield were the QB winners today.
Agree. None of the QBs really stand out so the Browns better take Barkley 1 and decide on what to do with 4 when they're on the clock. Ideally they should sign Cousins, draft Barkley, and whoever is best for at 4. What would be so wrong with letting Kizer learn from Cousins and not drafting a QB at all?
I actually hope Barkley ends up with Colts because they're always on TV here and I'll get to watch him more often.
As of right now, without too much reading or homework, I'm hoping my Steelers get lucky and land Vea or Jackson.
Sent from my BLA-A09 using Tapatalk
With the Brown's having 6 of first 65ish picks I dont know they need to fiddle around with trades to get more.
But what happens if Mayfield is gone before 10 and the top 4 QB are off the board. Then in a year u had 1 and 4 u ended up with no franchise qbThey don't need to, but the idea of selling the #4 spot to move back to #10 or so where Mayfield will likely still be waiting in order to pick even more youth and get some depth is the process they swore by. It's also part of the Patriot Way. Accumulate tons of picks rather than banking on making lots of early round picks work above and beyond.
But what happens if Mayfield is gone before 10 and the top 4 QB are off the board. Then in a year u had 1 and 4 u ended up with no franchise qb
I'm curious about the second tier of QBs in the Draft. Unless the Bills trade up, they'll be looking at Jackson, Rudolph, White, Ferguson, Falk, Litton, etc..
I've heard good things about White.
I don't want the Bills to give up all their assets to trade up.
What say you @lightningbolt44?
I unfortunately think they will trade up. They have so many holes but that said if they truly believe it is a Franchise guy then make the move for me where they are sitting they need to stay put and draft to fill holes which basically means bpa with the amount of holes . If they stay put and draft a second tier guy I wouldn’t be surprised to see Tyrod again next year while the rookie learns. That said one of the sure fire top 10 guys will drop it happens every year for various reasons. Allen is intriguing to me but I think it’s just the gigantic arm and he would end up being frustrating.
I wouldn’t rule out Lamar Jackson either which is going to frustrate as well, however I think he is a special athlete that will win games on his own. Unfortunately I think it will be with his legs more than his arm and that will be really frustrating to many fans that want a pure passer (can’t say I agree but understand where they are coming from)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If we assume the Colts are taking that DL at 3 then the Browns know that at a minimum they can get their franchise QB and the best DB in the draft. In that scenario I think it's tough to trade away picks. Maybe they get really luck and Barkley is available at 4. If not the alternative is pretty damn solid.I agree. My scenario is only if they are really sold on Mayfield. People were earlier trying to find justifications for picking Barkley over (insert QB here) at #1, and the only way I see it is if they have a plan for a QB that isn't Darnold, Allen, or Rosen.
Personally, I think the Browns take whatever QB they think is best at #1, and if they really have a need to get pick up Barkley they swap with the Giants or the Colts to make sure they get him, using their abundance of picks as leverage.
If we assume the Colts are taking that DL at 3 then the Browns know that at a minimum they can get their franchise QB and the best DB in the draft. In that scenario I think it's tough to trade away picks. Maybe they get really luck and Barkley is available at 4. If not the alternative is pretty damn solid.
But taking Barkley at 1 then then being guaranteed to get one of Rosen, Mayfield Darnald or the Wyoming guy (and probably have a choice between three of them) at 4 is pretty nice too.
Looks like Ward ran a very impressive 40 of 4.32, and Jackson put up an average 4.49. I'm guessing that makes Ward the 1st CB off of the board, and Jackson falls to late 1st round or early 2nd... bummer. Oh well, here's hoping a team falls in love with his height, length, and ball skills as he was fun to watch last year, and came across like a very good person in the interviews that i've seen him in.
Man oh man... I surely hope Chubb is there at 3 for the Colts. If not Chubb, I hope Barkley is. If they go 1-2, I am on the trade down bus. If a QB does not go 1 or 2, I would imagine the Colts will have a few teams trying to trade up for the #3 spot to get in front of the Browns.
That could be a big haul for the Colts, but I would not want to move down too far... Quenton Nelson would be my preferred option if we slide back from #3.
I think Chubb will be there for you especially if the Browns go QB at 1. That would spark the Giants to go QB at 2 and then you have your pick. I would hope you go Chubb so we can take Barkley at 4
The Browns hold that wild card at 1. I think they will take a QB at 1, but who knows. It would not shock me to see Chubb/Barkley go 1-2.
I think a lot of it depends on free agency. I dont think we are players for Cousins so that takes us to the McCarron sweepstakes and if thats the case, I want a QB at 1. Some would say just take Barkley at 1 and take your QB at 4. But the way I see it, with how deprived we have been at QB, dont risk your guy not being there at 4. Its the reason weve watched this crap sandwich on Sundays. Take your guy at 1 and best available at 4. Its too important of a position to try and get cute and miss your guy
I think that makes the most sense... As you said, if you do not take "your qb" at 1, then there is a very high chance that he will be gone at 4. The Giants could take a QB and if they don't, all of the QBs will be there at 3 and then the Colts have a pick that a few teams will be desperately trying to trade up for to get in front of the Browns. If the Browns take Barkley or Chubb at 1, it will be chaos.
I think a lot of it depends on free agency. I dont think we are players for Cousins so that takes us to the McCarron sweepstakes and if thats the case, I want a QB at 1. Some would say just take Barkley at 1 and take your QB at 4. But the way I see it, with how deprived we have been at QB, dont risk your guy not being there at 4. Its the reason weve watched this crap sandwich on Sundays. Take your guy at 1 and best available at 4. Its too important of a position to try and get cute and miss your guy