- Thread starter
- #126
usaf_giles;n8895245 said:United and City's transfer strategy has been totally different. I'll be the first to say that under the Glazer's ownership United have had no strategy and just bought people who sold shirts.
Look at the amount of money City's owners (UAE government) have put into the club compared to what the Glazer's have taken out. City has a two deep of $50-60 million players. Other than Foden I don't know of one academy product that will see any PT. United has Rashford, Lingard, Greenwood, Gomes, Mctominay, Tuanzebe, Pereira, and possibly Garner who will all be significant players this season. Even though is buy back was significant, let's not forget that Pogba was from the United youth setup.
Mansour has spent over a billion on players since acquiring the club. Those trophies are covered in oil, and last time I checked United wasn't in trouble for breaching FFP rules.
Man City has a purchased legacy, no doubt about it. I will admit, I don't follow United much, but I don't know who most of those players are, I am sure I will find out. Having Pogba in the youth system, losing him on a free, then buying him back for $100,000,000 is a pretty Utd sort of move. Academy's are quickly becoming a thing of the past in Premier League. kind of a shame really. But don't act like Utd haven't spent over $100,000,000 on it's starting back four.
And yes, FFP might ding City, but we know it won't. Also, FFP is silly anyways. I mean, European soccer is a heart of darkness. Just let the teams spend their own money. The time for FFP was 30 years ago. That ship has sailed.
Also, Arsenal will still have a joke of a backline. They will eat up the little clubs and get torched by the big ones. So is life as a Gooner.