DonJuan
Well-known member
And herein lies the issue. Your question looks at this from a employer-employee standpoint, which is how I look it. What is "fair" compensation for services rendered? Did this guy help Kuch read all the putts? Did he pick angles off the tee? Or did he just carry the bag? I'm not paying anyone 50-100k to carry a bag, unless it's my regular caddie or they undeniably contributed to the win.I have no opinion on the subject, but let me ask a generic question since some are running pretty hot on the subject.
Let's say a player hires a local caddie because his/hers falls ill. He/she knows the course pretty well and they agree to an amount to carry the bag. After about a day, he realizes he is playing really well, has a shot, but the caddie has not helped a single bit. In fact they don't communicate at all. Literally nothing, other than player telling caddie what club and caddie carrying clubs from hole to hole.
Player wins "in spite" of not having any assistance, does he owe the caddie a bonus for the work?
Others are looking at it from a Marxist perspective. Look at this bourgeoisie golfer taking advantage of this poor proletariat caddie. There's also a little social justice stuff mixed in here, too (The white guy with privelege taking advantage of the Mexican guy)
Then others are looking at this from a humanitarian aspect. Kuch could've changed this guy's life. The man wants to open a laundromat! (I'm not sure why it's Kuch's job to do that, but that's out there).
Then there's this weird American tipping culture thing where we expect rich people to tip more because they are rich. And if you don't we're going to shame you. I remember when Drew Brees was shamed for leaving a $3 for a takeout order.
In other words, there a lot of angles people are addressing this from.
Sent from my SM-T820 using Tapatalk