Improving ones short game is the best way to lower scores-no doubt about it. JB-have you tried the SCOR short game clubs yet?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Improving ones short game is the best way to lower scores-no doubt about it. JB-have you tried the SCOR short game clubs yet?
I am, but after speaking with Tadashi today and really knowing my game, I know this is going to be a process, and I am taking my time and making sure I ease back into it. It will have a short term negative effect on my game, but the final outcome will be as good as I was previously I believe.
Today was about testing myself on a shot that was always one of the best parts of my game to see if it was still there. 75 yards away on a flat surface to a pin in the middle of a green. Again we went with 36 Bridgestone B330-RX golf balls and used 2 different wedges for this task. Cleveland 588 60* wedge and Mizuno JPX 58* wedge. 18 balls with each wedge and the kicker is that 9 of them were played from normal ball position and normal shot and 9 were played back in my stance and lower trajectory shot. The goal was 30 out of 36 inside of 15 feet.
I failed at my test today as I only had 21 of 36 inside of 15 feet. All 36 were on the green, however 15 of them were scattered throughout ranging from 15 feet to about 25 feet. The balls played from normal position faired better than those that I played back in the stance with a lower trajectory. I also learned that both wedges performed quite well at this with the 588 getting 12 inside of 15 feet and the JPX getting 9 inside of 15 feet. I definitely preferred the balance and impact that the 588 made, but that is for a different thread and a different time.
I have about 2 more "tests" to complete this week and then the drills will begin to get me going on the right path.
I'd take 100% GIR from that range anyday. 66% within 15ft is really good with the 588, those would be solid birdie opportunities.
Do you feel all this focus on short game may take away from the other parts of your game?
Today was about testing myself on a shot that was always one of the best parts of my game to see if it was still there. 75 yards away on a flat surface to a pin in the middle of a green. Again we went with 36 Bridgestone B330-RX golf balls and used 2 different wedges for this task. Cleveland 588 60* wedge and Mizuno JPX 58* wedge. 18 balls with each wedge and the kicker is that 9 of them were played from normal ball position and normal shot and 9 were played back in my stance and lower trajectory shot. The goal was 30 out of 36 inside of 15 feet.
I failed at my test today as I only had 21 of 36 inside of 15 feet. All 36 were on the green, however 15 of them were scattered throughout ranging from 15 feet to about 25 feet. The balls played from normal position faired better than those that I played back in the stance with a lower trajectory. I also learned that both wedges performed quite well at this with the 588 getting 12 inside of 15 feet and the JPX getting 9 inside of 15 feet. I definitely preferred the balance and impact that the 588 made, but that is for a different thread and a different time.
I have about 2 more "tests" to complete this week and then the drills will begin to get me going on the right path.
Before my round today, I got to the course early and went to work on testing out where I am with the greenside bunker shots. I had 36 Bridgestone B330-RX golf balls and my Cleveland 588 wedge and my goal was to hit them all as I normally would to a pin that was in the middle of the green from the greenside bunker and a flat lie. The goal was to have all of them inside of 15 feet. Even in my "downturn" of short game, I have always been a pretty good sand player and in some ways its about geography. In my neck of the woods, its just a way of life, there are bunkers everywhere and most greens are surrounded. I truly expected to get 30 at a minimum inside the range and I was very surprised that only 17 of 36 balls landed with in 15 feet. 9 more landed between 15 and 20 feet and the other 10 were off the back of the green or extremely far away.
I found that I was trying a little to hard to assist the ball out and scoop it out rather than my way I have always done it and it led to bad things. This is definitely an area that I will continue to focus on as I continue on this journey. More coming soon.
Today was about testing myself on a shot that was always one of the best parts of my game to see if it was still there. 75 yards away on a flat surface to a pin in the middle of a green. Again we went with 36 Bridgestone B330-RX golf balls and used 2 different wedges for this task. Cleveland 588 60* wedge and Mizuno JPX 58* wedge. 18 balls with each wedge and the kicker is that 9 of them were played from normal ball position and normal shot and 9 were played back in my stance and lower trajectory shot. The goal was 30 out of 36 inside of 15 feet.
I failed at my test today as I only had 21 of 36 inside of 15 feet. All 36 were on the green, however 15 of them were scattered throughout ranging from 15 feet to about 25 feet. The balls played from normal position faired better than those that I played back in the stance with a lower trajectory. I also learned that both wedges performed quite well at this with the 588 getting 12 inside of 15 feet and the JPX getting 9 inside of 15 feet. I definitely preferred the balance and impact that the 588 made, but that is for a different thread and a different time.
I have about 2 more "tests" to complete this week and then the drills will begin to get me going on the right path.
Yesterday was a day in which I worked on the more unusual wedge shots. Unusual is not really the correct term, but a shot that is not used all that often in comparison to others. I set up 30 golf balls behind a greenside bunker and had to go over the bunker and land it on a short sided pin. The goal here was to have all the balls on the green with in 15 feet and all of the balls past the pin. I have learned in the past that getting cute with this shot leaves one of two results, either going too far under the ball and leaving it in the bunker or thinning the shot and leaving it skulled off the green. So in working with Amollerud in the past, the goal was always to get it past the pin so that worst case scenario, you are still putting and not giving up other strokes trying to reach the green. It is advice that has worked well for me.
I did the test 2 ways with 15 balls I opened up the Cleveland 588 60* wedge all the way and performed a flop shot and then not opening the club up and working with more of a pitch to go over the bunker and land on the green. I learned that both gave similar results and although I failed my test today, it was not by much.
All balls were in the green, but 8 of them were further than 15 feet away.
28 of 30 balls were past the pin.
When opening up the club head for more of a flop type of shot, the chance of user error was definitely greater if not skilled in the shot in my opinion. The pitch was definitely adequate in getting the ball over the bunker (by using the clubs loft) and settling on the green. While it may be slightly further away from the pin, taking away the big number is a nice thing to have and I may incorporate that in tough areas if I need to.
Overall, I came away pretty happy today and as I complete my tests to see where I am, I have realized where my work will be needed the most and where I should spend the most time. Coming up this week I will begin work on certain segments and will update here accordingly.
JB, Any chance of some photos or videos to show us stance, ball position-would help me as I work on this too. Thanks.
Yesterday was a day in which I worked on the more unusual wedge shots. Unusual is not really the correct term, but a shot that is not used all that often in comparison to others. I set up 30 golf balls behind a greenside bunker and had to go over the bunker and land it on a short sided pin. The goal here was to have all the balls on the green with in 15 feet and all of the balls past the pin. I have learned in the past that getting cute with this shot leaves one of two results, either going too far under the ball and leaving it in the bunker or thinning the shot and leaving it skulled off the green. So in working with Amollerud in the past, the goal was always to get it past the pin so that worst case scenario, you are still putting and not giving up other strokes trying to reach the green. It is advice that has worked well for me.
I did the test 2 ways with 15 balls I opened up the Cleveland 588 60* wedge all the way and performed a flop shot and then not opening the club up and working with more of a pitch to go over the bunker and land on the green. I learned that both gave similar results and although I failed my test today, it was not by much.
All balls were in the green, but 8 of them were further than 15 feet away.
28 of 30 balls were past the pin.
When opening up the club head for more of a flop type of shot, the chance of user error was definitely greater if not skilled in the shot in my opinion. The pitch was definitely adequate in getting the ball over the bunker (by using the clubs loft) and settling on the green. While it may be slightly further away from the pin, taking away the big number is a nice thing to have and I may incorporate that in tough areas if I need to.
Overall, I came away pretty happy today and as I complete my tests to see where I am, I have realized where my work will be needed the most and where I should spend the most time. Coming up this week I will begin work on certain segments and will update here accordingly.