mikedean441
6X HOF
Hope you guys have enough faith in him to pony up the $700K for Fantasy Golf!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Hope you guys have enough faith in him to pony up the $700K for Fantasy Golf!
Me neither. What better way to shut the critics up then go out and win and do so on a course (despite the changes) that he has absolutely owned.
Already did.
And will adjust when he WDs in round 2 on pace for an 80.
Knowing the firestorm that a WD would cause isn't it most likely that TW did have real back stiffness? Have to believe that with all the questions he'll now have to answer from the media would be worth sticking out 5 more holes if there was any way to do so.
I don't care one way or the other, but for what it's worth, the guy that does the Tiger Tracker feed on Twitter mentioned that Tiger was stretching his back out more than normal on the #1 tee before the complete blow-up commenced.
Im not saying a word about the WD, because I believe I know what happened...But when in the world has TW ever cared about whether or not a "firestorm" would turn up?
Was definitely what crossed my mind as well. If ya think about it the small purse he was going to take wouldnt really matter to Tiger.I was watching it as he WD. The first thing that crossed my mind was would he have toughed it out if he was only two shots back? He wins the '08 US Open on one knee but can't finish 5 more holes since he is 10 stokes back? This seems to be the book on Tiger and its not a pretty read. He will have to take several weeks off just to save face now and not look like a quitter.
Already did.
And will adjust if he WDs.
I was watching it as he WD. The first thing that crossed my mind was would he have toughed it out if he was only two shots back? He wins the '08 US Open on one knee but can't finish 5 more holes since he is 10 stokes back? This seems to be the book on Tiger and its not a pretty read. He will have to take several weeks off just to save face now and not look like a quitter.
Tiger is a pouter. He's done tremendous things for the game in helping its popularity grow, but this isn't the same tour that he was playing on 10 years ago. I don't think he can handle the fact that ANYONE can beat him these days. I have a feeling we're going to see fewer and fewer superstars because the fields are so deep now.
I understand that a lot of people can't stand Tiger...I get that, and I do not know how the below compares to other guys pushing 40, but is this really worth all the publicity when there was such a great finish and the story should be about Russell Henley getting a big win.
That surprised me, it seems like it's been more. I guess Tiger's WD gain more buzz than any other, might be aiding in that elevated chatter!I understand that a lot of people can't stand Tiger...I get that, and I do not know how the below compares to other guys pushing 40, but is this really worth all the publicity when there was such a great finish and the story should be about Russell Henley getting a big win.
I tend to agree. Here is an interesting article about WDs and the players who make them.
http://www.golfdigest.com/golf-tour...hdraw-at-an-unusually-high-rate-our-rund.html
I understand that a lot of people can't stand Tiger...I get that, and I do not know how the below compares to other guys pushing 40, but is this really worth all the publicity when there was such a great finish and the story should be about Russell Henley getting a big win.
I understand that a lot of people can't stand Tiger...I get that, and I do not know how the below compares to other guys pushing 40, but is this really worth all the publicity when there was such a great finish and the story should be about Russell Henley getting a big win.
I'm sure a bunch or people have said something like this before, but it'd really help if Tiger put forth the effort to be more likeable. He probably wouldn't be so polarizing if the beaming star of our sport wasn't the the very charismatic and generous golden bear of Jack Nicklaus. Jack is a champion for the game and is so very likeable. I think that's why so many (myself included) root for guys like Phil, Zach Johnson, Rory, etc. is that (on camera) they have such pleasant personalities. We don't want our shining star to be a horny, foul mouthed, robotic interviewer of a person. But then again that's what makes the drama so fun. We wouldn't have these conversations over and over if he were a Jack, Phil, or Arnie.
As far as the story should be about Russell Henley, not really. I mean good for him and everything, but golf fans want (in descending order based on my best guess):
* Tiger
* Phil
* Majors
* Ryder Cup
* Rory
* Major winners contending (Keegan, Webb, Bubba, etc.)
* Best players to never win a major contending (Stricker, Westood, Donald, etc.)
* Upcoming youngsters (Spieth, Rickie)
* The hot story of the week (Jimmy Walker)
* Some pretty something or another on camera (Paulina, Gulbis, Holly Sonders)
* Everything else
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A couple things...
I may be REALLY wrong with this, and someone with more than my 35 years could easily correct me, but I seem to remember hearing accounts that Jack was never the amiable everyman, crowd favorite that Arnold was. I think it is easy to take Jack's competitive persona, and really the pre-scandalous Tiger persona, as quiet, competitive champions. Tiger didn't change post-scandal, the moralistic view of the person he was behind closed doors rubbed certain elements of society (large swaths granted) the wrong way, so now every action is viewed through that prism. Again, to each their own there.
My point was that Tiger withdrew from a tournament he was never in contention to win. He didn't break clubs over spectator heads, punch a playing partner, show up drunk, or anything considerably newsworthy. Hideki Matsuyama and D.H. Lee also withdrew this week...but no one cares. Russell Henley (who I would put in the upcoming youngsters category, ironically with twice as many wins as Fowler now) wins a tournament with a strong field, and everyone (media-wise) channels their energy into Tiger.
Your categories are close to right, but if I am the PGA Tour, I want Henley being discussed, not Tiger.
A couple things...
I may be REALLY wrong with this, and someone with more than my 35 years could easily correct me, but I seem to remember hearing accounts that Jack was never the amiable everyman, crowd favorite that Arnold was. I think it is easy to take Jack's competitive persona, and really the pre-scandalous Tiger persona, as quiet, competitive champions. Tiger didn't change post-scandal, the moralistic view of the person he was behind closed doors rubbed certain elements of society (large swaths granted) the wrong way, so now every action is viewed through that prism. Again, to each their own there.
My point was that Tiger withdrew from a tournament he was never in contention to win. He didn't break clubs over spectator heads, punch a playing partner, show up drunk, or anything considerably newsworthy. Hideki Matsuyama and D.H. Lee also withdrew this week...but no one cares. Russell Henley (who I would put in the upcoming youngsters category, ironically with twice as many wins as Fowler now) wins a tournament with a strong field, and everyone (media-wise) channels their energy into Tiger.
Your categories are close to right, but if I am the PGA Tour, I want Henley being discussed, not Tiger.