Tadashi70
Well-known member
I just see a world now where you are forced to address things like this. It's possible everything is on the up and up. However, I can see media members forcing Tim Finchem or someone to address questions like "One of your biggest stars is being connected to professional gamblers and FBI probes into gambling, sports and insider trading. What is the Tour's stance?" "Commissioner, do you believe there is a connection between one of the game's biggest stars playing below his ability in big tournaments this year, and him potentially owing a gambler for some insider stock advice?"
I struggle with your interpretation of the artlcle. Phil was questioned for possible insider trading not gambling. Did I miss something? Did it say point shaving or illegal gambling ring?