Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Wow, less than 10 hours and over 300 posts already, that was a lot to wade through! Enjoyed the write-up @Jman, these look like they're going to be a HUGE hit for Callaway. Just to make sure I'm clear on the line - I'm currently playing Mavrik irons, so the DCBs would be the closest to them, with the next step up being the standard Apex 21s?
The search is never over for a true club ho
I hear you loud and clear... rowing the same boat. And I love my '19 apex ironsI cant get the pro's out of my head, these and the mim's are constantly on my mind. I cant wait to hit both
This made me LOL for real HAHAHA!!!A true club ho would buy the XXIOs and these!!
I love the looks of the Pro. I think they could have been even better if they would have just left the "Tungsten" badging off all together, but they are sharp looking either way. I'm not entirely sure I'm willing to give up distance from the Mav Pro, but I will definitely hit them this spring. Just to see, of course.
Lots of interesting nuggets in that article. The hollow body sounds interesting from playing the KFT all year. They do look to have a sleeker profile for sure. So many good looking irons out this year. I sound like a broken record every time something new is released.
Same here. I'm definitely intrigued by Apex Pro and I'm sure I could play them. But I don't think I'm willing to give up much distance for improved feel or a profile I might like slightly better, especially since the distance on the Mav Pros has been really consistent for me.i agree. mav pro distance is nice. curious how much i would lose if i went pro.
Same here. I'm definitely intrigued by Apex Pro and I'm sure I could play them. But I don't think I'm willing to give up much distance for improved feel or a profile I might like slightly better, especially since the distance on the Mav Pros has been really consistent for me.
One things the guys touched on with the Pros were with the changes they made with the hollow body construction and the positions of the tungsten, they were seeing higher launch, especially on thin strikes, while gaining distance. Obviously those comparisons weren't made to the Mav Pros, but it sounds like it could be promisingmy mav pro are already 1* weak. loft to loft looks to be about 1.5* weaker in pro 21. and so often, in fittings i’m told i need more launch and more spin. so pro 21 may actually be a good idea for me.
One things the guys touched on with the Pro's were with the changes they made with the hollow body construction and the positions of the tungsten, they were seeing higher launch, especially on thin strikes, while gaining distance. Obviously those comparisons weren't made to the Mav Pros, but it sounds like it could be promising