Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I'm due to replace my 58* PM grind and this could be a great option.
I know they are both full face grooved wedges, but I think they have different missions personally. With a longer and more offset face, the PM grind I feel is more for flop and sand shots. That's just my opinion though. They are both great looking wedges, just think they might suit someone differently, especially when you get in the 58 and above lofts.and I know looks are personal, but I think these look way better than the PM Grind in terms of shape and offset.
In a similar boat. tough to drop $180 on an unfamiliar wedge grind when the PM is so good to me.I'm due to replace my 58* PM grind and this could be a great option.
I have also heard rumors of a new PM grind coming out sometime this summer. Not sure how true that is, but that's the word on the street I have heard.In a similar boat. tough to drop $180 on an unfamiliar wedge grind when the PM is so good to me.
I know they are both full face grooved wedges, but I think they have different missions personally. With a longer and more offset face, the PM grind I feel is more for flop and sand shots. That's just my opinion though. They are both great looking wedges, just think they might suit someone differently, especially when you get in the 58 and above lofts.
I can agree with this. I will say the big difference in the two minus the shape is the direction of the micro grooves. Cleveland's run parallel with the other grooves, but PM grinds run diagonal, which when you open the face, I would think this affects things a little differently. I may be way off though. What do you think?maybe? I mean right on Cleveland's homepage it says "This is not a wedge, it's a flop shot machine."
I think it's just a different way to get a similar result and that's cool.
I can agree with this. I will say the big difference in the two minus the shape is the direction of the micro grooves. Cleveland's run parallel with the other grooves, but PM grinds run diagonal, which when you open the face, I would think this affects things a little differently. I may be way off though. What do you think?
Neither will win a beauty contest, but for that spot it's all about playability.and I know looks are personal, but I think these look way better than the PM Grind in terms of shape and offset.
I don't need a raw full face.
I don't need a raw full face.
I don't need a raw full face.
nice, pretty sure i'd buy one of these if i saw them in the wild.Had a rough outing with my PM Grind 58* and, in a moment of weakness, bought an RTX Full Face that was staring at me in the pro shop. Admittedly, we're still honeymooning but my gosh these are SO GOOOOOOD.
I didn't realize how much I was avoiding my 58* until I replaced it with a new one.
I would be interested in hearing how you contrast playing the PM grind to the RTX Full face. The PM grind is ugly as sin in my eyes but there has to be a method to its madness.Had a rough outing with my PM Grind 58* and, in a moment of weakness, bought an RTX Full Face that was staring at me in the pro shop. Admittedly, we're still honeymooning but my gosh these are SO GOOOOOOD.
I didn't realize how much I was avoiding my 58* until I replaced it with a new one.
I would be interested in hearing how you contrast playing the PM grind to the RTX Full face. The PM grind is ugly as sin in my eyes but there has to be a method to its madness.
Anyone play a 50 or 52 in the full face offering?