- Joined
- Sep 11, 2013
- Messages
- 74,198
- Reaction score
- 87,430
- Location
- Ponte Vedra, Florida
- Handicap
- 11.9
It is!!!! Can’t wait to read @JB drop in the morning!Sooo...tomorrow is the big day?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It is!!!! Can’t wait to read @JB drop in the morning!Sooo...tomorrow is the big day?
It is!!!! Can’t wait to read @JB drop in the morning!
I bet my numbers would be nearly identical to yours. I felt like the ERC and Bridgestone were the highest launching of the 4 balls for sure and they felt very similar off the clubhead. It's funny how similar the Tour Speed and Tour Response perform so similarly. The Tour Response feels so much better I would choose it over that Titleist ball 10 times out of 10.Bridgestone Ball Testing - Driver
I wanted to continue the testing as I moved up my bag and tested my driver and a hybrid. I mainly looked at ball speed, spin, and carry distance for these two clubs. I am going to review the Driver on this post.
I am using the Tour Edge EXS Driver and the Callaway Mavrik Driver, both set at 10.5 and have the same length shaft of 43" I hit 5 shots with each driver to see if there were any differences. First five with Mavrik and the second with Tour Edge
View attachment 8989821
As I have and others have mentioned the Bridgestone Ball is a lower spinning ball. Looking at my averages the swing speed and ball speed were very similar, however, as you can see the spin numbers for the Bridgestone Test Ball were consistently lower. The average overall spin on the Bridgestone ball tended to be from 340 to almost 500 RPMs lower. Also, looking at my carry numbers and I see the Bridgestone Ball with the same average Ball Speed and Club Head Speed provided a carry distance from 7 to 11 yards longer.
Another interesting data point was the data point showing how often I would have hit the fairway. I generally don't play huge fairways at my public course and being in the fairway for the second shot we all know can be the difference between scoring well or poorly on the hole. Assuming a 40-yard fairway (20 on each side from the middle), I would have hit the fairway on 6 of the 10 drives using the Bridgestone. The Callaway had 2 out of 10 drives, the Titleist had 4 out of 10 drives, and the TaylorMade also had only 2 out of 10 drives hit the fairway. My normal drive to fairway ratio with Arccos is 36.5%. The Bridgestone Test Ball performed exceptionally well in this area.
Looking at the launch angle, spin numbers, carry distance, and the number of times I hit the fairway, I can see that this ball is looking very promising toward my game.
They will!!! Time to pick up a dozen for her!I'm curious to see if they come in yellow. Marjorie wants to get a dozen to try out since they performed so well for her and she's a yellow ball player, although she said she would be willing to play them in white if she had to
Decent price too! About 5-10 less than I was expectingThey will!!! Time to pick up a dozen for her!
I bet my numbers would be nearly identical to yours. I felt like the ERC and Bridgestone were the highest launching of the 4 balls for sure and they felt very similar off the clubhead. It's funny how similar the Tour Speed and Tour Response perform so similarly. The Tour Response feels so much better I would choose it over that Titleist ball 10 times out of 10.
Yeah, I got to play 9 Saturday with the Bridgestone and it was high launching. Maybe too high for me off the driver.Based on my launch monitor numbers the Bridgestone launched higher with the driver than the ERC and was the highest of all the balls off the driver. Off the irons the wedges had about the same height and with a 7i the Tour Speed was lower but the other three balls were about the same height.
Yeah, I got to play 9 Saturday with the Bridgestone and it was high launching. Maybe too high for me off the driver.
Club head speed was fire today, smash factor was ice cold with the driver.
Yes it's a little soggy out there. I had planned on hitting on the simulator after my fitting today, but they were doing lessons so it wasn't available. I will do the same, an on course evaluation between the balls. Otherwise it's a hour + to a launch monitor.Tried not to pay too close of attention to the numbers in here until I hit the new ball, but there's quite a bit of data by now. I should get my first chance to test them on Thursday, and know how 2 of the balls perform for me already, so instead of adding to the data load I think I might mostly test them side by side on course with my usual evaluation shots, and then maybe pull just the Bridgestone inside to test. Should be fun, but looks like soggy and 45*. Easy carry evals at least.
I think we were given the other balls to test the Mystery Ball v. The Industry leaders in this price point.
I think the the Q-Star Tour should have been included because it’s a great ball in this price point.