Adding my 6i results, again CSX TT on top:
View attachment 8928177
I was perplexed so I reached out to @rehbirdie to get his thoughts. Responded in less than 5 minutes.
“Hi Mark, I saw your post and it does look like the RX outperformed through when you note that your swing speed was 2.5 mph slower.
CS 89.1 swing speed - 130.6 Ball Speed - 1.47 Smash - 238.8 yards
RX 86.6 swing speed - 128.2 Ball Speed - 1.48 Smash - 233.0 yards
If you extrapolate out to similar swing speeds then...
CS 89.1 swing speed - 130.6 Ball Speed - 1.47 Smash - 238.8 yards
RX 89.1 swing speed - 131.9 Ball Speed - 1.48 Smash - 244.5 yards
Your spins numbers were WAY better with the RX as well. You don’t ever want to be moving toward anything in the 3000s on driver.”
To say that put me at ease is understatement.
Man, this such a “New Bridgestone” I cannot really believe it.
Thank you and Welcome Back!
I get that in your driver tests your swing speed was down with the RX, and that obviously affects the end results, but it wasn't in your 6i test. Your swing speeds were nearly identical and the CSX outperformed the RX on that limited number of swings rather handily. Or am I missing something?
I have no dog in this fight, btw. I'm really excited to try the new B offerings. Never really tried any Bridgestone until the end of last year and didn't get enough input to make any lasting judgements. Going to go ball testing crazy once the weather here allows.