We've launched the new forums! Read more here

2025-2026 College football thread

buckeyewalt said:
Click to expand...

 
Papa 3-Putts said:
I generally don't mind the Big Ten or their fans - except Ohio State.

Their "f**k Dolly Parton" chants and matching t-shirts last year were tantamount to declaring war on the entire State of Tennessee.
Click to expand...
I’m a LSU fan but that Dolly slander will not be tolerated.
 
JDax said:
I’m a LSU fan but that Dolly slander will not be tolerated.
Click to expand...
And here I thought you are the embodiment of Louisiana, you do have a heart 🤣🤣🤣
 
 


Facts… Brian Kelly should be sued for negligence at least.
 
 
buckeyewalt said:
This guy should be a doctor by now!:oops:

Click to expand...

I looked it up
2019 - traditional redshirt
2020 - ”free” Covid year
2021 - played
2022 - torn ACL
2023 - played
2024 - torn ACL
2025 - played
 
tequila4kapp said:
I looked it up
2019 - traditional redshirt
2020 - ”free” Covid year
2021 - played
2022 - torn ACL
2023 - played
2024 - torn ACL
2025 - played
Click to expand...
He tackled Justin Fields in a game. 🤣
 


I just don’t understand what’s happening with people’s brains anymore
 
The NCAA unearthed another revenue stream Friday when Division I leaders approved patches for uniforms in a move that could generate millions to fund athletic departments that are looking for new ways to pay players.

Beginning Aug. 1, Division I teams can place up to two patches of no more than 4 square inches on uniforms for regular-season games. Those are in addition to the logos already allowed for the uniform manufacturers.

Rules committees for the postseason will decide how to handle March Madness, the College World Series and other playoff tournaments, with attention being paid to making sure individual schools aren't advertising for companies that compete with NCAA sponsors. :rolleyes:
 
outlawx said:
lol that would put duke in over Miami 🤣🤣🤣
Click to expand...
If they had to put in Duke and ND would they have kept Bama over Miami? We know JMU would be out but we dont know if they kept a 3 loss Bama in.
 
echico said:
If they had to put in Duke and ND would they have kept Bama over Miami? We know JMU would be out but we dont know if they kept a 3 loss Bama in.
Click to expand...
Miami felt like a reach around for the ACC since they were getting no one in with the season ending rankings.

I just feel like the SEC get preferential treatment. So yeah bama gets dog walked right into the playoff s
 
outlawx said:
Miami felt like a reach around for the ACC since they were getting no one in with the season ending rankings.

I just feel like the SEC get preferential treatment. So yeah bama gets dog walked right into the playoff s
Click to expand...
Again if ND automatically in then would the committee look at Miami that beat them over Bama that lost bad in SEC championship and had 3 losses. They didn't move down at all but with a new format would they have? Cant just assume SEC bias.
 
echico said:
Again if ND automatically in then would the committee look at Miami that beat them over Bama that lost bad in SEC championship and had 3 losses. They didn't move down at all but with a new format would they have? Cant just assume SEC bias.
Click to expand...
Why assume when the track record is there? It’s like innocent until proven guilty.
 
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top