you aren’t wrong - even with Chrome Soft!That little nippy spin is fun.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
you aren’t wrong - even with Chrome Soft!That little nippy spin is fun.
Thanks to the awesomeness of @outlawx and @blugold, I was able to do some testing across the whole line of CTs today (L-R is CTX, CT, and CS).
View attachment 9412990
All-in-all, this is an absolute stellar line - I could truly see me gaming any of these balls without hesitation. With approach shots, I could see the line separate, particularly with the X producing more pronounced height / landing angle.
However, with wedges, each ball felt pretty similar - soft but responsive, and a firm click off the face. Now I know I was landing on turf, so I was paying attention to spin, but all seemed to stop in the same relative zone without much release.
Need to do some more testing on a practice green, but the early front runner is the X - I always desire more height in my irons and think this could be the ticket. Even better that they feel relatively similar - I’ve been turned off by some X balls in the past due to thier hardness.
Still blown away by these balls - well done Callaway.
I’m a huge fan of the CTX for the added height and spin.
Interesting - I saw the opposite. It was only a degree or so difference, but still a difference.I thought the CTX was lower flight/height than the standard CT, like TP5X vs TP5, as opposed to most where X is the higher flight ball. It certainly seemed that way when I've tried them. Nowhere near as high a flight as I'm used to from PV1X or Maxfli Tour X.
That would be incorrect, the Chrome Tour has a softer compression and lower spin/trajectory. Taylormade is the outlier with having the X version as the softer lower flight version.I thought the CTX was lower flight/height than the standard CT, like TP5X vs TP5, as opposed to most where X is the higher flight ball. It certainly seemed that way when I've tried them. Nowhere near as high a flight as I'm used to from PV1X or Maxfli Tour X.
Interesting - I saw the opposite. It was only a degree or so difference, but still a difference.![]()
That would be incorrect, the Chrome Tour has a softer compression and lower spin/trajectory. Taylormade is the outlier with having the X version as the softer lower flight version.
Super interesting- appreciate you sharing your feedback!Then the aero just doesn't work for me. On my ST+ the CTX launches lower and spins less than the Maxfli Tour X, PV1X, and B RX/RXS and on course the other day it was the lowest flying of the group.![]()
Keep in mind that Launch Angle is only piece that truly impacts the flight. You will not get this from most launch monitors or sims as they do not have distinct aero models for each ball in most cases. For example CTX has the most spin of the family but will actually fly lower as a result of the aerodynamics.Interesting - I saw the opposite. It was only a degree or so difference, but still a difference.![]()
Appreciate that clarification @JasonFinleyCG !Keep in mind that Launch Angle is only piece that truly impacts the flight. You will not get this from most launch monitors or sims as they do not have distinct aero models for each ball in most cases. For example CTX has the most spin of the family but will actually fly lower as a result of the aerodynamics.
Ok so I wasn’t crazy about the flight being lower (I’m certainly crazy about many other things).Keep in mind that Launch Angle is only piece that truly impacts the flight. You will not get this from most launch monitors or sims as they do not have distinct aero models for each ball in most cases. For example CTX has the most spin of the family but will actually fly lower as a result of the aerodynamics.
Yep - you weren’t going crazy! Eating crow as we speakOk so I wasn’t crazy about the flight being lower (I’m certainly crazy about many other things).
Thanks for clarifying.![]()
Yep my mistake! I could’ve swore I remembered that the CTX had a higher ball flight as well as more spin. Typically more spin results is a higher ball flight so maybe that where I was getting it.Ok so I wasn’t crazy about the flight being lower (I’m certainly crazy about many other things).
Thanks for clarifying.![]()
For me it’s all about spin profile. I can’t play the CTX even with strong hollow body irons. It was longer off tee but a problem for me otherwise. I would look at ball speed and descent angle.If someone was on the fence between CT and CS, what features in a golf ball or attributes of a golfers swing would someone look at to determine where to start first?
And for the purposes of the question, let’s say that differences in feel is irrelevant
It’s a really good golf ball. The entire “soft is slow” crap doesn’t mean “soft is short” so many more parts than just ball speed to the equation.*don't**sleep**on**the**Chrome**Soft*
High and straight with plenty of stopping power on the greens.
How is short game spin compared to the others? Been a while since I tried a CS, but the CT/CTX don't work for me. Hope to find a sleeve for this weekend.*don't**sleep**on**the**Chrome**Soft*
High and straight with plenty of stopping power on the greens.
The one I had stopped on greens without issues. I would move in this direction for my game over a CTXHow is short game spin compared to the others? Been a while since I tried a CS, but the CT/CTX don't work for me. Hope to find a sleeve for this weekend.
If you mean partial wedges shots, chips and pitches, it's identical. Maybe a couple hundred RPM based on strike quality. Full swings into greens, lots of stopping power.How is short game spin compared to the others? Been a while since I tried a CS, but the CT/CTX don't work for me. Hope to find a sleeve for this weekend.