H8tobogie
MC Team Hackers 2020
These will be a must try for me this year. Great writeup James!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What’s cooler is that’s just the face of the Speed, the others are totally different. And the face that every single loft in the fairways has a unique one as well still blows my mind.
they used the carbon fiber toe patch to take weight from out there and move it internally, creating the bias.
Okay. It's clicking now. That makes sense. Sorry...I'm a bit slow.
Which leads me to this: does the moving of that weight lessen toe forgiveness? Seems like with less weight, their would be a reduction in forgiveness.
@Jman, I loved the review and appreciate your ability to make technical and completely foreign notions to me more easily understandable.
The fairways have me excited as well since I liked the Mavrik fairways when I tested them. One thing that really stood out in our presentation is that they said testing showed the sweet spot was 36% larger than Mavrik. Center hits produced 1.1mph more speed than Mavrik. Low center strikes were 1.4mph faster than Mavrik. I will be purchasing these fairways!!Oh, and great write-up @Jman ! Love hearing the details behind the changes and innovation. For how little I've heard about the lineup I think people are going to get excited in a hurry.
As someone who loved the Mavrik FW's and is a little non-plussed by the TSi3's, it made me almost twitchy to hit these reading about them.
I get what Callaway are trying to do, but as a selfish consumer I wish they wouldn't keep tying spin profile to a directional miss, even though I guess its logical.the conspiracy theory crowd will rehash the tired ol' "they're trying to drive sales to the customs." the looks are very bold, will definitely stand out on a retail shelf, and are polar opposite of what i'd prefer to see. @Jimmy3864 mocked up a pretty sweet custom though.
i'll definitely hit these. i wish callaway would consider a more neutral max model. the mav max has been a great driver for me, but it does have an affinity for the left side of the golf course.
So, I think this is where the adjustability for the Max and Max LS comes in. And I can speak on the LS as it’s the one (lower spin, not low spin) aimed at the trends in golf, particularly the shot shape that’s becoming the go to. That said, they’re adamant the weight adjustability and adapter can get them extremely neutral.I get what Callaway are trying to do, but as a selfish consumer I wish they wouldn't keep tying spin profile to a directional miss, even though I guess its logical.
The fairways have me excited as well since I liked the Mavrik fairways when I tested them. One thing that really stood out in our presentation is that they said testing showed the sweet spot was 36% larger than Mavrik. Center hits produced 1.1mph more speed than Mavrik. Low center strikes were 1.4mph faster than Mavrik. I will be purchasing these fairways!!
I think I understand that.From a technical sense, no. It is more about face closure than it would be about speed and spin retention.
The fairways have me excited as well since I liked the Mavrik fairways when I tested them. One thing that really stood out in our presentation is that they said testing showed the sweet spot was 36% larger than Mavrik. Center hits produced 1.1mph more speed than Mavrik. Low center strikes were 1.4mph faster than Mavrik. I will be purchasing these fairways!!