You're still dodging the question. No one has said the deaths are non-existent. They've said the data to support your 20X claim is non-existent. Either cite your reference or quit claiming it as valid data.You are comparing other contagious diseases in which we never did a shutdown, to a very highly contagious and deadly disease in which we shut down. Without shutdowns, we could have been looking at 70,000+ deaths in the 54 and under age group, based on comparisons of other countries in which non-shutdown rates were 10x higher.
7,000 dead during a shutdown. Non-existent? Wow.
By the way, comparing mortality rates doesn't matter if there were a shutdown or not. Mortality rates aren't affected by the shutdown. Only the infection rate is affected.