how much do you think you saved vs buying one ordered to spec?
I have not recently gone through the exercise of spec'ing out my PC through a custom builder, because I tend to be very hardware specific when I put a build together, and it's not always easy to get those specific components without going to a local builder. When I was able to compare buy vs build for a specific hardware list - and this was maybe ten years ago - it was about 10-15% cheaper to build my own. It's easy to build one, I enjoy it, and so I have not looked into it again.
Compared to buying on comparable performance - custom build vs a less expensive standard model available in the Big Box stores - I see three advantages to building my own:
- I get exactly the components and levels of performance I want.
- Superior build components and quality. I bought two mass-produced models from one of the two biggest suppliers of consumer PCs at two different big box stores. The first was a Media Center PC with all kinds of connectivity, a killer CPU and graphics card, and a terrific price. What I didn't know was that the manufacturer cut costs by using a proprietary motherboard with inferior components, specifically, the capacitors. Two years into ownership, a capacitor failed and that was that. The repair costs were almost the same as replacement costs. The second PC was more general purpose, but the manufacturer cut the lengths of the power supply cables so short that the power cable to the hard disk drive would not stay connected. I returned it on the last day of the return period. Manufacturer's margins on mass market desktop PCs are razor thin, and that's after cutting every possible cost.
- Durability. My homebuilts have lasted a minimum of seven years. This year I upgraded my home server and sold the old (2013) AMD motherboard on eBay for almost what I paid for it new. A family member is using my 2011 build for internet and mail.