We've launched the new forums! Read more here

If the Broncos are sold for $4.5 billion

echico

echico

#MOIJacking
Albatross 2024 Club
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
22,914
Reaction score
35,377
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Handicap
8.5
The highest for any US sports team. If all the teams were for sell now who is over the $4.5 billion number. I think the obvious answers are the Yankees, dodgers, Cowboys, and Lakers. Who else? Which team wouldn't go over $1 billion?
 
Last edited:
I doubt any NFL, NBA, or MLB teams would be valued under $1B. Heck even some MLS teams are approaching $1B valuations.
 
MLS teams WOW! I recall the Lerner's stole (in my opinion) the Nationals for something like $500M, they were last valued over $2B that's what 4 fold increase in about 20 years - nice work if you can get it.
 
echico said:
The highest for any US sports team. If all the teams were for sell now who is over the $4.5 billion number. I think the obvious answers are the Yankees, dodgers, Cowboys, and Lakers. Who else? Which team wouldn't go over $1 billion?
Click to expand...
Celtics would be in there.
I would have to look up to see who owns real estate too.
 
Forbes does articles on this - but they can be wrong, example they value the Commanders at $4.2B - I think they are slightly off - by about $4.2B. As long as Snynder owns them they are void of value.
 
I think both celtics and golden state right now - just watching the finals. Avalanche in Hockey. I'm just going off of finals teams from the past week.
 
I have to imagine most NFL teams would go for around that number or over it
 
I'm not talking valuation. I'm talking free market. All the teams are for sale and the Broncos are the first to sell. Where do we start to fall in?
 
I know we're talking about US sports, but Chelsea FC just sold for $5.35 Billion.

I'd bet the Yankees, Lakers, Celtics would easily be there. Maybe the crappiest team in baseball Cubs.
 
JB said:
Celtics would be in there.
I would have to look up to see who owns real estate too.
Click to expand...
Celtics? I would have had Knicks and Warriors over them. Maybe Brooklyn and the Clippers.
 
MLB I’d say only Yankees, Dodgers, Cubs, Red Sox
 
echico said:
I'm not talking valuation. I'm talking free market. All the teams are for sale and the Broncos are the first to sell. Where do we start to fall in?
Click to expand...
I’d Say at least half of the NFL would sell for more than Broncos
 
RealPretendPsychic said:
Celtics? I would have had Knicks and Warriors over them. Maybe Brooklyn and the Clippers.
Click to expand...
The price tag on history has a huge bonus for potential owners. Most NBA titles looks great on a place holder.
 
BuckNasty said:
I’d Say at least half of the NFL would sell for more than Broncos
Click to expand...
I would consider the Broncos to be at least in the top 10 of NFL franchises with all things considered. In US sports they are in the top quarter at least. That is me spit balling it not really putting pen to paper.
 
I would say most NFL teams would be in nearly the same price range as I believe (though I could be very wrong) that they do profit sharing between all teams.

MLB I would think Yankees, Red Sox, Dodgers, and Cubs would go for more than all the others, maybe the Braves are up there thanks to TBS
 
JB said:
Celtics would be in there.
I would have to look up to see who owns real estate too.
Click to expand...
Rams own the new stadium in LA don't they? I would have to imagine they are in that range of values too.
 
echico said:
I would consider the Broncos to be at least in the top 10 of NFL franchises with all things considered. In US sports they are in the top quarter at least. That is me spit balling it not really putting pen to paper.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't. :ROFLMAO:

Thats why they had to WAY overpay to get a Franchise QB before this sale.
 
echico said:
Which team wouldn't go over $1 billion?
Click to expand...

Sadly my Reds might be on the list. They would go for more than a billion, but not much more. They're probably a bottom 10 valued team of all the 3 major sports leagues.
 
JB said:
The price tag on history has a huge bonus for potential owners. Most NBA titles looks great on a place holder.
Click to expand...
I was even alive for one of them! Still don’t see them being in the same league as the Lakers, Knicks, and Warriors.
 
RealPretendPsychic said:
I was even alive for one of them! Still don’t see them being in the same league as the Lakers, Knicks, and Warriors.
Click to expand...
It shows what current and winning does, because before Curry, the Warriors were on the chopping block constantly about being sold, being moved, etc.
 
JB said:
It shows what current and winning does, because before Curry, the Warriors were on the chopping block constantly about being sold, being moved, etc.
Click to expand...
That’s my case study for star athletes being underpaid!
 
DataDude said:
Rams own the new stadium in LA don't they? I would have to imagine they are in that range of values too.
Click to expand...
Yes Stan owns the stadium and charges the Chargers a $1 a year in rent I believe.
 
Avs are only valued at $680M. Walton already mentioned a new stadium presumably on land his cuz-in-law Kroenke owns next to Ball Arena. He wants to build an entertainment district between them like in Phoenix. This would help the value of all the teams in Denver.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top