Why would courses do this? Raising the cup is idiotic. I understand the idea but the pool noodle works much better & actually gives you a shot of holing it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I suppose if someone saw the ball come into contact with the raised cup and come to rest either against it and bounce off a bit, maybe the situation is different. But, if no one saw that, you don't know if it stopped ever so slightly short.But to me that is very different than this. That has the opportunity to go in, this does not and is just resting against what would be the hole.
MODIFICATIONS TO THE HOLE; NOT REQUIRING THAT PLAYERS HOLE OUT
A number of questions have been received that relate to modifying the hole so that players no longer need to reach into the hole to remove a ball to minimize the possibility of exposing golfers to coronavirus.
These have included some courses setting holes so that the hole liner remains an inch or two above the surface of the green while others have placed various objects into the hole or around the flagstick (such as foam pool noodles or plastic piping) so that a ball is unable to fall to the bottom.
While in all of these instances, the ball is not holed per the Rules of Golf (Rule 3.3c), a round played under these conditions will result in an acceptable score for handicap purposes using the most likely score guidelines (see Rule 3.3 of the Rules of Handicapping).
While the most likely score procedure is intended to support certain formats of play where the player is not required to hole out (such as in match play when the player’s next stroke is conceded or in four-ball stroke play when a partner picks up), it is also temporarily in effect where the above described safety measures are being used.
When using most likely score, the player should consider the number of strokes most likely required to complete the hole, and determine whether the ball would have been holed or not. Most likely score is at the player's best judgment and should not be used to gain an unfair advantage.
I would be more inclined to count this as opposed to a shot that hits the cup at a screaming pace and winds up 40 feet away. With local rules in effect that consider a ball that strikes the cup to be holed, I vote that it’s a 1 on the card. Maybe call it a “Cup in one”
It's not a local rule either, it's a temporary USGA rule. It's officially official.That was my initial thought. If the local rules are calling hitting the cup, holing it, then it has to be, right?
If we were playing cups like this, the folks in my points game would change their tune real quick if I take 8 points for that. They'd all be arguing about how there was no way to see if it hit the cup from the tee box. Those old men are serious about their $12.Unfortunately no for hole in one, but under the current adaptations it should go down as a one on the scorecard. Not a hole in one, but an eagle (assuming it’s a par 3).
Another casualty (of very little consequence in the big picture) of this terrible situation.
You'll see a putt hit the cup. Unless someone sees the tee shot hit the cup and come to rest against it or just a bit off, you don't know that it hit the cup, or stopped just short.So for those of you saying no, how do you make a putt?
But to me that is very different than this. That has the opportunity to go in, this does not and is just resting against what would be the hole.
I would say no & this will probably happen to me now. Now I like the idea that @Jmk202 stated above that his club is doing. If it was like that then yes I would count it becasue the ball dropsughhh don't give me nightmares! My club has simply been putting the cups in upside down, which makes them very shallow but still below the surface.
You'll see a putt hit the cup. Unless someone sees the tee shot hit the cup and come to rest against it or just a bit off, you don't know that it hit the cup, or stopped just short.
I’m going on the premise that the ball was resting on the cup. I believe that what clubs are doing who raise the cup it if it hits the cup it’s holed. In my club there is a $1000 hole in one, that our club insures. So this would be a heated topic if that occurs.If we were playing cups like this, the folks in my points game would change their tune real quick if I take 8 points for that. They'd all be arguing about how there was no way to see if it hit the cup from the tee box. Those old men are serious about their $12.
I believe my ruling would get you to the next tee. One on the card for scoring purposes. But not a hole in one.For all of those saying no, how on earth would you ever advance to the second hole? Stroke limit on every hole?
I believe my ruling would get you to the next tee. One on the card for scoring purposes. But not a hole in one.