There's far worse takes in this thread.Matt Ryan was really good & if the Falcons don’t choke away that Super Bowl, he would have been in the HOF.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There's far worse takes in this thread.Matt Ryan was really good & if the Falcons don’t choke away that Super Bowl, he would have been in the HOF.
But.....stay with me here, what if we put Largent in the system that Rice played and see what his stats would be...... I present to you exhibit AThat's on me. I brought Rice into their dumpster fire.
| Stat | Actual Largent (1976–1989) | Projected Largent | Reasoning/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seasons Played | 14 | 20 | Matches Rice's longevity; Largent was durable. |
| Games Played | 200 | ~290-300 | Similar games-played rate, assuming health. |
| Receptions | 819 | ~1,300-1,450 | ~60-75% increase; targets rise dramatically (e.g., 100+ catch seasons possible multiple times). Largent averaged ~4 rec/game; could push 5.5-6 in prime. |
| Receiving Yards | 13,089 | ~19,000-21,500 | Volume boost + solid YPC (~14.5-15). Not quite Rice's 22k due to less explosiveness, but elite for era. |
| Yards per Catch | 16.0 | ~14.5-15.5 | Slight drop from deeper shots in 80s to more intermediate in West Coast, but still high efficiency. |
| Receiving TDs | 100 | ~140-170 | Big jump; more red-zone targets in winning offenses (Rice had 197; Largent could approach 150+ with better QB accuracy). |
| Pro Bowls | 7 | 10-13 | More All-Pro level seasons with better team/QB. |
| All-Pro | 3 First-Team | 6-9 First-Team | Dominates in prime years. |
| Super Bowls | 0 | 2-3 (likely) | Thrives in contenders; could have SB MVP potential in big games. |
| Other Notes | Held all major records at retirement | Likely breaks some of Rice's records or comes very close (e.g., receptions/yards leader for a time) | Cultural impact huge; still "Broadway Joe"-level fame but with rings. |
I love you man, but put the grass/bottle down.At one point in time, Leonard was the best. 2015 Leonard was a machine.
I think there's a difference between hate and saying near the bottom of a top 10 list.I'm actually a pretty big Peterson fan. The vikings have generally been my #2 team for most of my life......I've never seen a harder runner off tackle who also had the speed that he did.
Im still not sure i would take him over LT, given how much Tomlinson also helped you in the passing game
I am not really sure i understand all the LT hate. He's 6th alltime in total yards.....7th in rushing and 12th alltime in receiving for RBs and has won an MVP.
I'm not sure if people watched football in like 2004
When you get over the legal voting age it absolutely does. Flacco took the BROWNS to the playoffs at like 38 years old.Just that longevity doesn't always mean good.
No doubt LT was great. From what I remember, the NFC West was sort of cupcake back in his prime, so there's that....meanwhile, AD ran for 2k yards in the NFC North.I'm actually a pretty big Peterson fan. The vikings have generally been my #2 team for most of my life......I've never seen a harder runner off tackle who also had the speed that he did.
Im still not sure i would take him over LT, given how much Tomlinson also helped you in the passing game
I am not really sure i understand all the LT hate. He's 6th alltime in total yards.....7th in rushing and 12th alltime in receiving for RBs and has won an MVP.
I'm not sure if people watched football in like 2004
Well then, let's go back to my post that started this and plug Megatron into the AI.But.....stay with me here, what if we put Largent in the system that Rice played and see what his stats would be...... I present to you exhibit A
Projected Stats for Hypothetical Largent (in Rice's Environment)Scaling conservatively: Boost volume by 40-60% (accounting for more attempts, better QB, but adjusting for Largent's slightly lower athletic ceiling and the West Coast's shorter-average targets). Assume he maintains ~90-95% of his real per-game efficiency (strong hands/route-running fit perfectly), but with higher catch totals and slightly lower YPC (14.5-15.5 range).
Stat Actual Largent (1976–1989) Projected Largent Reasoning/Notes Seasons Played 14 20 Matches Rice's longevity; Largent was durable. Games Played 200 ~290-300 Similar games-played rate, assuming health. Receptions 819 ~1,300-1,450 ~60-75% increase; targets rise dramatically (e.g., 100+ catch seasons possible multiple times). Largent averaged ~4 rec/game; could push 5.5-6 in prime. Receiving Yards 13,089 ~19,000-21,500 Volume boost + solid YPC (~14.5-15). Not quite Rice's 22k due to less explosiveness, but elite for era. Yards per Catch 16.0 ~14.5-15.5 Slight drop from deeper shots in 80s to more intermediate in West Coast, but still high efficiency. Receiving TDs 100 ~140-170 Big jump; more red-zone targets in winning offenses (Rice had 197; Largent could approach 150+ with better QB accuracy). Pro Bowls 7 10-13 More All-Pro level seasons with better team/QB. All-Pro 3 First-Team 6-9 First-Team Dominates in prime years. Super Bowls 0 2-3 (likely) Thrives in contenders; could have SB MVP potential in big games. Other Notes Held all major records at retirement Likely breaks some of Rice's records or comes very close (e.g., receptions/yards leader for a time) Cultural impact huge; still "Broadway Joe"-level fame but with rings.
I think there's a difference between hate and saying near the bottom of a top 10 list.
With 7 of those 18 years over .500 - all with the Ravens, who won most of their games with that defense they had. Since then he's 11-27.Your point? 18 years with Flacco in the NFL
lol no he didn’t. He was the last one standing for a team that won with 5 different QB’s. He threw more touchdowns to the defense than the offense in the playoffs for us. He stinksWhen you get over the legal voting age it absolutely does. Flacco took the BROWNS to the playoffs at like 38 years old.
I would love to meet the NFL exec who'd take Frank Gore over Ladainian Tomlinson
And yet HES STILL PLAYING. Clearly he’s still a top 40 QB in the world or they wouldn’t employ a 40 year oldWith 7 of those 18 years over .500 - all with the Ravens, who won most of their games with that defense they had. Since then he's 11-27.
Right time, right place.
But agrees with the rest lmaoooChase > Jefferson
Jarvis Landry > OBJ
No doubt LT was great. From what I remember, the NFC West was sort of cupcake back in his prime, so there's that....meanwhile, AD ran for 2k yards in the NFC North.
He played 4 games, went 1-3, and 0-1 in the playoffs.When you get over the legal voting age it absolutely does. Flacco took the BROWNS to the playoffs at like 38 years old.
Played in 5 games and averaged 300+ yards and 2.5 TDs. Better than mostlol no he didn’t. He was the last one standing for a team that won with 5 different QB’s. He threw more touchdowns to the defense than the offense in the playoffs for us. He stinks
So did I. I wasn't distracted by the pretty powder blue uni and blacked out visor.I used to watch football