|Tier 1||Bryson Dechambeau|
|Tier 2||Xander Shauffele|
|Tier 3||Patrick Reed|
|Tier 4||Scottie Scheffler|
|Tier 5||Webb Simpson|
|Tier 6||Tommy Fleetwood|
|Tier 7||Corey Conners|
|Tier 8||Matthew Wolff|
|Tier 9||Sebastian Munoz|
|Tier 10||Lanto Griffin|
Outside of the norms Im big on Scheffler and like the Wolf inclusion.We do a pool in the office every year for all the Majors. Pick one guy from each tier based on odds.
Here is my selection for this year.....let me know what you think.
Tier 1 Bryson Dechambeau Tier 2 Xander Shauffele Tier 3 Patrick Reed Tier 4 Scottie Scheffler Tier 5 Webb Simpson Tier 6 Tommy Fleetwood Tier 7 Corey Conners Tier 8 Matthew Wolff Tier 9 Sebastian Munoz Tier 10 Lanto Griffin
True. And it didn't look like too rough a stretch at the end of 2008 dropping him down either. Probably the US Open Win points dropping off.and it's not like he was a slouch. Always seemed to be involved in the majors and had a US Open title to his name.
You just never know who is going to show up. I think a lot depends on weather too. I would say if they don’t get a lot of rain then I am looking at @MWard picks. If they do his picks are still looking good but @ddec picks become more intriguing. Especially Cameron Champ. We saw how he played there on a softer course and he could do it again.Last week we got together as a staff and made predictions for The Masters. We were tasked with choosing the winner, as well as a dark horse, someone not ranked in the top 25 that we thought had a chance to grab the green jacket.
Of course directly after the graphic was made, Jordan Spieth won at the Valero, so dark horse might not be the best descriptor.
Crazy to think that none of the staff made the same predictions.
Who do you agree with? Who do you think is way off base? Give us your thoughts below.