- Moderator
- #901
Absolutely you do. Look at the conversation. No doubt he comes back.If you’re Portnoy, do you invite Malosi back next year? He doesn’t have the presence of some of the bigger players, so they could skip him and be fine
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Absolutely you do. Look at the conversation. No doubt he comes back.If you’re Portnoy, do you invite Malosi back next year? He doesn’t have the presence of some of the bigger players, so they could skip him and be fine
I wonder if he's going to be voted off the Good Good island because he was a Bad Bad boy.Even his own good good teammates were calling him out.
I think it would be a loss for GG. He's the most charismatic one besides scharff who is very annoying. I'm pretty low on GG content although they seem nice enoughI wonder if he's going to be voted off the Good Good island because he was a Bad Bad boy.
He will. Because every story needs a villain.If you’re Portnoy, do you invite Malosi back next year? He doesn’t have the presence of some of the bigger players, so they could skip him and be fine
Yeah, I don't watch a whole lot of their stuff...I've never been able to figure out their dynamic.I think it would be a loss for GG. He's the most charismatic one besides scharff who is very annoying. I'm pretty low on GG content although they seem nice enough
With that in mind - will they invite Kwon back again?He will. Because every story needs a villain.
The way Dave loves drama. I will say yes. The bigger question is…will they accept?With that in mind - will they invite Kwon back again?
This is so true. I’ve played with ones in tournaments that I have called out/caught cheating and refused to sign their scorecards because of it. One I busted for moving his ball mark on the green twice cost him a spot in the US Am.they say play golf with someone to find out their real character.
I would say yes because the cheating stuff likely generated a bunch of views and $$$.If you’re Portnoy, do you invite Malosi back next year? He doesn’t have the presence of some of the bigger players, so they could skip him and be fine
Honestly I feel like a lot may get the invite and not want to come back. Paige especially. Too much like competitive golf which many in the YT space didn't want to participate in. But hard to turn down the opportunity for that kind of cashwho do you all think doesnt return?
No way The Duke gets invited back. Daltoosh was barely involved. Yandle didnt seem to get much screen time. Sketch was an odd choice to begin with. I could see at least 10 not getting a second chance
How could you turn it down though? So many eyes on some of these creators that wouldn’t otherwise be seenHonestly I feel like a lot may get the invite and not want to come back. Paige especially. Too much like competitive golf which many in the YT space didn't want to participate in. But hard to turn down the opportunity for that kind of cash
Exactly. I think Brad said on twitter he gained 100k YT subscribers over the last 3 weeks. That’s an insane increaseHow could you turn it down though? So many eyes on some of these creators that wouldn’t otherwise be seen
I think there’s some who won’t return because it wasn’t enough like competitive golf. I think Paige wanted a larger audience to see how good she really is at golf (which she is), and that she’s not just a thirst trap…but I would think the drama in that last round killed her desire to come back - or it will at least take some convincing.Honestly I feel like a lot may get the invite and not want to come back. Paige especially. Too much like competitive golf which many in the YT space didn't want to participate in. But hard to turn down the opportunity for that kind of cash
Brad is a US Am, professional golfer and obviously a stick and heads and shoulders above everyone else there.
I think there’s some who won’t return because it wasn’t enough like competitive golf...If they’re really interested in the growth of the event, I think they need to de-Barstool it just a little.
I dont know who any of those people are, but the Dunkin thing that makes sense and I know their CMO decently well. They have a number to spend and the outcome is ROI on items that cost $1.I thought Dunkin's organic advertising was inspired. Would be curious to know those numbers on cost, ROI, and the harder to measure brand awareness.
One of the parts of this that showed it was amateur hour was no real rules meeting, a rules sheet that was just local play stuff provided by the course, and a rules "official" who doesn't even golf. Just allow freaking slope and it's a nothingburger. Add in guys like Joey stirring the pot and you've got your tempest in a teapot.
This is going to be a sad state, but from the ones I know pretty well, build quality means nothing, unless you mean the quality of the contract.You’re right - they wouldn’t be able to just get away with providing the devices, they’d have to put significant skin in the game too…but I can attest that you absolutely get what you pay for with their rangefinders.
You probably get it with build quality and performance alone…but their warranty makes it one of the best overall values in golf.
I think the mistake the PGA Tour made with the Creator Classic was trying to make it too much like a Tour event…Wesley Bryan, Grant Horvat, and Peter Finch would like a word.
this is right on.
the planning conversation will very much be whether they need to lean on the golf, or lean on the entertainment. Portnoy even made the comment at one point "I like my toys." I forget who he was referring to, but that's not someone there for golf ability. and you've got the Duke wandering around openly doing drugs they have to blur out and causing the course marshals to yell at them over pace - when the course is one of the major sponsors. that's pretty heavily on the entertainment side to the detriment of the golf side. on the other hand, we're not watching this to see a tour event. how do they find the sweet spot where it's still personality driven without falling off the cliff?