Since when is a game considered "good" only to be tied to how well you do in it? By far it is my worst k/d ratio CoD game (trending up BTW) but I'm enjoying it much moreso than AW.
I've found that it takes some teamwork and communication and when we do that, all of our performances improve. Be unpredictable and creative, it might serve you well with how versatile the surfaces are to get around the map.
As for "inconsistencies," if there are truly any, it should work both ways. I've had the same moments as everyone, but you also benefit from those times too.
I don't base this off my K ratio which is currently around 1.2 or so. It was up in the 1.5 range for a little bit.
I shared my opinion on this game like many others. I guess if I'm not positive about it, I shouldn't say anything? I can't share my true feelings? What if someone happens upon this thread and just wants true feedback?
I think the maps are good maps. Every day I learn of new areas and things to do and try. I think the graphics are well done. I like the guns and all the customization even though that brings its own issues.
The specialists are kind of cool. Not my favorite aspect but still fun to switch them up and try different things.
The scorestreaks can be way too powerful at times and thus why some camp out. Nothing worse than needing 50 points for a huge streak and getting shot in the back. So just hang out and wait for that kill.
This game is far and away better than MW3 and Ghosts. I didn't play AW since I heard how terrible it was from all my friends. I was the first of my group to buy this game and my friends followed. Sadly, they all gave up after a week so I get to play alone. Few people, if any, ever talk on the game.
So if my opinion doesn't count because it's negative, I'll back out