- Thread starter
- Staff
- #76
So, I'm to the point of writing this review now having played them both in two different heads and a myriad of different configurations in each head.
But, I FINALLY found some hard info on these in terms of spec's and though all of it will be included int he review which I would imagine will go up next week sometime, I wanted to share some ofthe info on these two shafts I got for this review.
As to the 70T, I was sent the X-Flex version, which interestingly enough has a lower butt and tip stiffness rating than the S-Flex version. It carries a 2.7 torque rating and more importantly, explaining much of what I saw, it is classified by Matrix as being low-mid in trajectory as compared to the "low" cover-all we were given initially. Explains a TON of what I saw with this during testing.
With the 60B, 2.9 torque and a mid trajectory rating which is also in line with what I saw.
As I said, thought some might be interested in this info which sort of changes the "low/low" moniker we initially were given.
But, I FINALLY found some hard info on these in terms of spec's and though all of it will be included int he review which I would imagine will go up next week sometime, I wanted to share some ofthe info on these two shafts I got for this review.
As to the 70T, I was sent the X-Flex version, which interestingly enough has a lower butt and tip stiffness rating than the S-Flex version. It carries a 2.7 torque rating and more importantly, explaining much of what I saw, it is classified by Matrix as being low-mid in trajectory as compared to the "low" cover-all we were given initially. Explains a TON of what I saw with this during testing.
With the 60B, 2.9 torque and a mid trajectory rating which is also in line with what I saw.
As I said, thought some might be interested in this info which sort of changes the "low/low" moniker we initially were given.