Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Is it really necessary for OEM's to keep changing the names of clubs?

  1. #1
    Club Pro
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Omaha, ne
    Posts
    433
    Member
    40019
    Handicap
    12
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    141
    Thanked in
    83 Posts

    Is it really necessary for OEM's to keep changing the names of clubs?

    Look, I get the idea of coming out with new tech in clubs, especially drivers. But is it really necessary to keep changing the name of the clubs which, to me, just adds confusion to the whole process.

    For example, Callaway is coming out with an Epic Flash. Why call it an Epic Flash? Why not just refer to it as the Epic 2019. Wouldn't it be much easier to understand that:

    The Epic 2019 is an update to the Epic line in the first place, and more current than the Epic 2017? And wouldn't it be easier for a consumer to reach a buying decision knowing that they are now two revisions behind the current model. For example, if they were playing the Epic 2014 and a new Epic 2019 is released, they might be more encouraged to buy the latest and greatest Epic knowing they are a couple releases behind (assuming a 2 year cycle)?

    When I heard that Titleist was changing the name of their driver from the 900 series to the TS2 and TS3, the first thing that came to mind is this really a new series of drivers for amateurs or is this an update to the 900 series. Confusion abounded.

    These name changes just make the whole process of reviewing clubs a nightmare... but perhaps that's their intent?

  2. #2
    Major Champion erock9174's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    N Canton, OH
    Posts
    3,571
    Member
    7797
    Handicap
    9.3
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    128
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,256
    Thanked in
    784 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jjfcpa View Post
    Look, I get the idea of coming out with new tech in clubs, especially drivers. But is it really necessary to keep changing the name of the clubs which, to me, just adds confusion to the whole process.

    For example, Callaway is coming out with an Epic Flash. Why call it an Epic Flash? Why not just refer to it as the Epic 2019. Wouldn't it be much easier to understand that:

    The Epic 2019 is an update to the Epic line in the first place, and more current than the Epic 2017? And wouldn't it be easier for a consumer to reach a buying decision knowing that they are now two revisions behind the current model. For example, if they were playing the Epic 2014 and a new Epic 2019 is released, they might be more encouraged to buy the latest and greatest Epic knowing they are a couple releases behind (assuming a 2 year cycle)?

    When I heard that Titleist was changing the name of their driver from the 900 series to the TS2 and TS3, the first thing that came to mind is this really a new series of drivers for amateurs or is this an update to the 900 series. Confusion abounded.

    These name changes just make the whole process of reviewing clubs a nightmare... but perhaps that's their intent?
    For me personally when scouring ebay I hate when a club is named the same. For example, search on Taylormade M2 and you get both the 2016 and 2017 models. I would rather TM have just called the 2017 model M3/M4, 2018 model M5/M6 and 2019 model M7/M8. I think Ping learned this after going to the Ping G in 2016, back to the numbering convention with the G400.
    Driver Rhapsody 16*
    Fairway G400 SFT 5w
    Hybrids
    Exotics Xrail 4h/5h
    Irons G700 6-UW Modus 3 Tour 105R
    Wedges Glide 2.0 Stealth 56*/60*| Sure Out 64*
    Putter Sigma G Tyne H
    Ball: Chrome Soft Truvis
    Bag: Four 5
    Tracking:





  3. #3
    I <3 GAWLF
    tpluff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    22,553
    Member
    17140
    Handicap
    Winter
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    21,648
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    13,800
    Thanked in
    6,965 Posts
    I get the frustration, I really do. Callaway, as you mentioned specifically, has done the year naming convention in the 815-816 lines and still does it with their irons as they say CF16 or CF18 on them. There's a lot of marketing into it and as long as they don't keep them the same convention (2016-2017 M1/M2) that's fine with me.
    GBB Epic Sub Zero 9 ​UST Mamiya HeLIUM Prototype
    Rogue Sub Zero 3W (15) Project X Even Flow Blue
    BBA 815 3H (19) Fujikura Speeder 865
    JPX 919 Forged 4-GW ​True Temper DG 120 TI [Thanks to Ultimate Weekend!]
    Mack Daddy 4 54 X / MD3 Milled 58 W True Temper DGTI 120 / Onyx Wedge
    O-Works #7s Black
    Chrome Soft X


    Proud #DreamTeam #TheGrandaddy alum thanks to & !



  4. #4
    No Dad bod..Father Figure J.B. Cobb III's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    Carolina Beach, NC
    Posts
    693
    Member
    50607
    Handicap
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    311
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    462
    Thanked in
    227 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jjfcpa View Post
    Look, I get the idea of coming out with new tech in clubs, especially drivers. But is it really necessary to keep changing the name of the clubs which, to me, just adds confusion to the whole process.

    For example, Callaway is coming out with an Epic Flash. Why call it an Epic Flash? Why not just refer to it as the Epic 2019. Wouldn't it be much easier to understand that:

    The Epic 2019 is an update to the Epic line in the first place, and more current than the Epic 2017? And wouldn't it be easier for a consumer to reach a buying decision knowing that they are now two revisions behind the current model. For example, if they were playing the Epic 2014 and a new Epic 2019 is released, they might be more encouraged to buy the latest and greatest Epic knowing they are a couple releases behind (assuming a 2 year cycle)?

    When I heard that Titleist was changing the name of their driver from the 900 series to the TS2 and TS3, the first thing that came to mind is this really a new series of drivers for amateurs or is this an update to the 900 series. Confusion abounded.

    These name changes just make the whole process of reviewing clubs a nightmare... but perhaps that's their intent?
    Titleist changed the name on their series of drivers because Tom Wishon has had a driver out for about 10 years that's called the 919THI. I guess they didn't want any confusion.

  5. #5
    HEAD GOLF PROFESSIONAL OLDPRO46's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    OHIO
    Posts
    348
    Member
    40817
    Handicap
    0
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    50
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    170
    Thanked in
    99 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by tpluff View Post
    I get the frustration, I really do. Callaway, as you mentioned specifically, has done the year naming convention in the 815-816 lines and still does it with their irons as they say CF16 or CF18 on them. There's a lot of marketing into it and as long as they don't keep them the same convention (2016-2017 M1/M2) that's fine with me.
    It'll be interesting down the road since I believe Callaway's Epic Flash will have 4 offerings. Epic Flash. V1, V2, & V3. lol!

  6. #6
    Major Champion annsguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Charlotte,N.C.
    Posts
    3,012
    Member
    19928
    Handicap
    My3Kids
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    500
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    991
    Thanked in
    701 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by J.B. Cobb III View Post
    Titleist changed the name on their series of drivers because Tom Wishon has had a driver out for about 10 years that's called the 919THI. I guess they didn't want any confusion.

    I shocked that Titleist is concerned about what Whishon does.
    Nexus stand bag
    Triton DvD 10.5*
    FG5 14*
    RBZ Hi Launch 17*
    Rescue TP 23*
    G2 Irons 6-W
    Wedge(s) PMP 56* & 60* Tour Grind
    Duo U Q Star
    by

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to annsguy For This Useful Post:

    PKorf (12-06-2018)

  8. #7
    Major Champion annsguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Charlotte,N.C.
    Posts
    3,012
    Member
    19928
    Handicap
    My3Kids
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    500
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    991
    Thanked in
    701 Posts
    When I was a salesperson calling on running accounts people expected the shoe to be identical if you called it the same name each season. You try to improve but keep the atributes people like about the product to begin with. It does help to create repeat customers.
    Nexus stand bag
    Triton DvD 10.5*
    FG5 14*
    RBZ Hi Launch 17*
    Rescue TP 23*
    G2 Irons 6-W
    Wedge(s) PMP 56* & 60* Tour Grind
    Duo U Q Star
    by

  9. #8
    Major Champion erock9174's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    N Canton, OH
    Posts
    3,571
    Member
    7797
    Handicap
    9.3
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    128
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,256
    Thanked in
    784 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by annsguy View Post
    I shocked that Titleist is concerned about what Whishon does.
    My guess is it might have been more related to the name already being trademarked.
    Driver Rhapsody 16*
    Fairway G400 SFT 5w
    Hybrids
    Exotics Xrail 4h/5h
    Irons G700 6-UW Modus 3 Tour 105R
    Wedges Glide 2.0 Stealth 56*/60*| Sure Out 64*
    Putter Sigma G Tyne H
    Ball: Chrome Soft Truvis
    Bag: Four 5
    Tracking:





  10. #9
    #TeamPrestige Cheesehead blakehall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Green Bay, WI
    Posts
    5,003
    Member
    360
    Handicap
    4.3
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    13,288
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5,602
    Thanked in
    2,446 Posts
    I for one and completely happy with my mashie, niblick and cleek.
    Epic Flash SZ, 10.5* Graphite Design AD IZ
    F9 3-4 Evenflow White
    Apex 20* Fujikura Motore
    4 Apex Smoke TT Elevate Tour Black
    5-AW Apex Pro Smoke DG Tour Issue
    MD4 54*S
    PM Grind 2.0 Tour Grey 60*
    Toulon Atlanta / Santa Monica
    Chromesoft X

    Proud Member of 2017 Grandaddy Runner-Up Team Prestige

  11. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to blakehall For This Useful Post:

    JMB3 (12-06-2018), JonD (12-06-2018), OGputtnfool (12-06-2018)

  12. #10
    Beginner jll62's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    56
    Member
    42051
    Handicap
    +4.2
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    9
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    35
    Thanked in
    18 Posts
    Companies aren't all that concerned with any difficulty the comes with reviewing clubs, but they are hyper aware of how the club will be perceived in the market. If you have a club that did extremely well, then a derivative name will often be used by clubs that follow to keep that connection to the successful product (e.g., RBZ being used again in 2013, M1 and M2 being used again in 2017). If you have a club that failed to gain traction in the market, then you abandon that name because you don't want the market to associate the new product with the "failed" product. It might make it a little more confusing for consumers at times, but it's just smart marketing.

    Look at the golf ball market. Pro V1 has stuck around as a name because it became the defacto standard for the modern golf ball. Titleist would be stupid to change the name, and they know it. Now consider TaylorMade's attempts to gain a foothold in the market: Penta, TP Red/Black, Lethal, Tour Preferred, and now TP5/TP5x. Did these names mean the TM ball changed more than the Pro V1? Of course not. The Pro V1 changed just as much as any of the TaylorMade balls during this time, but the Titleist Pro V1 brand had real value in the market, while the TaylorMade models had some followers but overall they were failed attempts at making a meaningful mark in the market. If TM had named the TP5/TP5x by continuing with the Tour Preferred name of the prior two generations of balls, I don't think consumers would have been as willing to try them.

    Branding is important. It may not matter to our individual golf games, but it matters as a whole to companies and how their products are received by the irrational actions of consumers.
    M3 9.5, GD Tour AD GP-6s
    M3 T3, Mitsubishi Tensei Pro White 70s
    UDI 2, KBS C-Taper Lite 115 X
    P-770 3, KBS C-Taper S
    P-770 4, KBS C-Taper S+
    RSi TP 5-PW, KBS C-Taper S+
    Milled Grind 52 Raw, DG S400
    Hi-Toe 60 (58), DG S400
    DJ Itsy Bitsy Proto, 34"
    TP5x

  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jll62 For This Useful Post:

    dazeedmonds (12-07-2018), JMB3 (12-06-2018)

  14. #11
    HOF Tag Huntin' PKorf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    10,989
    Member
    38677
    Handicap
    0-10
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    6,161
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7,810
    Thanked in
    3,908 Posts

    Is it really necessary for OEM's to keep changing the names of clubs?

    Quote Originally Posted by J.B. Cobb III View Post
    Titleist changed the name on their series of drivers because Tom Wishon has had a driver out for about 10 years that's called the 919THI. I guess they didn't want any confusion.
    I truly hope this was meant to be sarcastic. Cause until about 30sec ago noone else in the world knew there was an actual Tom Wishon driver out there.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Proud member of TEAM HACKERS in the 2018 MORGAN CUP
    KING F8+ 44.5" w/HZRDUS Red 65 6.5
    Rogue 3W w/EvenFlow Blue 75 6.5
    KING F8 2Hyb w/ES SW 780 SmacWrap Black S-Tipped 1/2"
    KING UT 4I w/ CTaper Lite Stiff
    KING Pro-Black 5,6CB / 7,PWMB w/CTaper Lite Stiff
    KING Black VersGrind (52.08/56.10/60.08)CTaper Lite Stiff
    OWorks 3T Black 34"
    Proud member of TEAM HACKERS in the 2018 MORGAN CUP

  15. #12
    El Capitan del Norte
    mancest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Oakland, CA
    Posts
    11,491
    Member
    7825
    Handicap
    11.5
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4,669
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10,555
    Thanked in
    4,978 Posts
    Need to? No but I understand the rationale. As has been mentioned in here, M1/M2 16/17 was a confusing one to many. Shoes/cars etc they have the same model names but update years, in Drivers when a 2017 M1 is out an costs 400 but a 2016 M1 can be had for $250 new... well you can see how that could be a problem.

    Doing a different name gives at least a couple benefits: 1) differentiates from the previous model and also the next model. 2) lets you have a fresh/new market strategy.

    Lets not kid ourselves, these companies are for profit industries and are trying to sell product.
    Epic Flash SZ 9* D/S ADDI 65 SR
    Epic Flash SZ 13.5/18* Rogue Elite Blue 65R
    Rogue 21* VA Composite 85R
    P790 5-AW LZ 5.0
    53/58* DG 115
    EDEL - E1
    Duo Professional Matte Orange

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •