michaelb
Member
Yes, he did touch on the naming of it but did stress that it was only his personal opinion that maybe it could have been better had they named it along the lines of M1 Burner / Aero / etc to make it clearer that the M2 was not a replacement for the M1
To a point I agree with this, but if TM go along with the same numbering with the next releases and call those M1-17 / M2-17 / etc then maybe it will help to keep the different lines separate but obvious as to what they are replacing
Them moving forward with that naming scheme m1-17 and m2-17, then m1-18 and m2-18 is actually a great idea... Sadly, they probably won't do that.