darthweasel
Well-known member
Saturday morning went down the YouTube rabbit hole and came across a Phil Mickelson instructional video on the short game. As luck would have it, the wife needed me out of the house (the dial goes to 11, why play guitar at 5 just cause she is sleeping?) so I went to a nearby course to try it out. Later that afternoon played 9 with a friend and we got matched up with a random dude.
Random plays okay...his pitch game he is usually on on near the green but his putting...leaves something to be desired. 3 jacks were the norm, 4 not uncommon. If his pitches were closer I am not even sure it would have helped. Meanwhile, I have a 3 hole run of : par 3 where I chip it to 3', get up and down for par. Chip it to 5', roll it in for the par. Chip in from 10 yards off green to save the par.
Talking to my buddy about "Seems this Mickelson guy may know something about the short game" and we have a brief discussion on things watching that video corrected. Now, mind you, I am under no illusions that suddenly every chip for the rest of my life is going to be on the green, much less in one-putt range...but clearly that lesson improved my chipping. So the random hears the end of it, asks what I saw, I tell him it was a Phil Mickelson video, mention the weight on the front foot...and instantly he is like, "No, you can't do that, you have to have 60/40, with weight on the back leg" which is pretty much the opposite of what Mickelson showed...at one point Mickelson literally took his left leg off the ground to show where his weight was.
Well, who should I listen to...a random guy on an executive course I am beating or an exceptional short game player? it is a tough call. I mean, sure, my chipping instantly and dramatically improved simply by adjusting ball position and weight distribution per Phil's recommendation...but this random guy on the course is probably a better instructor...
Random plays okay...his pitch game he is usually on on near the green but his putting...leaves something to be desired. 3 jacks were the norm, 4 not uncommon. If his pitches were closer I am not even sure it would have helped. Meanwhile, I have a 3 hole run of : par 3 where I chip it to 3', get up and down for par. Chip it to 5', roll it in for the par. Chip in from 10 yards off green to save the par.
Talking to my buddy about "Seems this Mickelson guy may know something about the short game" and we have a brief discussion on things watching that video corrected. Now, mind you, I am under no illusions that suddenly every chip for the rest of my life is going to be on the green, much less in one-putt range...but clearly that lesson improved my chipping. So the random hears the end of it, asks what I saw, I tell him it was a Phil Mickelson video, mention the weight on the front foot...and instantly he is like, "No, you can't do that, you have to have 60/40, with weight on the back leg" which is pretty much the opposite of what Mickelson showed...at one point Mickelson literally took his left leg off the ground to show where his weight was.
Well, who should I listen to...a random guy on an executive course I am beating or an exceptional short game player? it is a tough call. I mean, sure, my chipping instantly and dramatically improved simply by adjusting ball position and weight distribution per Phil's recommendation...but this random guy on the course is probably a better instructor...