Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Love the PM Grind but wouldn't as much without the full face grooves.
Haven’t hit one, but they look odd to me. Really like my Vokey’s and doubt I will change. Have to be able to look down and like what you see. Hi-Toe just doesn’t do it for me
Having had the original PM grind and now on to a hi-toe, the TM looks a lot better to me at address.
I think the TM is an exponentially better looking wedge, I’ve played both, both perform great, but the TM’s look SO much better from a flow standpoint.
This seems to come up a lot, but I just can’t wrap my mind around the “looks” thing being a problem. Way back when, mallet putters “looked” different, but for some they just worked better, and eventually they “looked” fine. Over-sized drivers once “looked like Volkswagens on the end of a stick”. But ultimately they worked better than persimmon and evolved into what we have now, and eventually they “looked” fine too. Point is, looks are ultimately unimportant and perception is subject to change. Performance is the only thing that really matters. If high-toe wedges do in fact prove to be a better option performance-wise, our negative perception will evolve into acceptance.
That said, I know looks breed confidence, and I get it, but at the same time I don’t...just offering food for thought.
Looks matter to people in all areas of life though. Homes, cars, clothes, all kinds of things. So why is it a surprise golf is the same?
Some are lucky to not care about the looks, and I envy them in a way, but aesthetics are a HUGE part of the story still. Confidence is everything, and for some looks are a key part of breeding confidence.
Looks matter to people in all areas of life though. Homes, cars, clothes, all kinds of things. So why is it a surprise golf is the same?
Some are lucky to not care about the looks, and I envy them in a way, but aesthetics are a HUGE part of the story still. Confidence is everything, and for some looks are a key part of breeding confidence.
Looks matter to people in all areas of life though. Homes, cars, clothes, all kinds of things. So why is it a surprise golf is the same?
Some are lucky to not care about the looks, and I envy them in a way, but aesthetics are a HUGE part of the story still. Confidence is everything, and for some looks are a key part of breeding confidence.
Honestly to me the looks are the best part. I have tried many lob wedges and they were all skull machines for me. The full face of grooves really makes this club look like it will get under the ball without my help so I don't do stupid stuff subconsciously and put a weird swing on the ball trying to scoop it off the ground.
1. Testing wedges off store mats is an absolute waste of time. After trying the PMs in the store, I thought they looked weird, felt heavy and I hated the Tour V shaft.
2. Fast forward to now: I play two PMs, think they look and feel great and of course play just as well. And the Tour V is an absolutely fine shaft.
3. The HiToe may look more svelte, but copper finish is hideous and wears way too fast. Side by side, I much prefer the leading edge and looks of my dark finish PMs.