rollin
"Just playin golf pally"
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2012
- Messages
- 12,639
- Reaction score
- 1,119
- Location
- planet earth, milky way galaxy
- Handicap
- 15.7
It is often suggested that most people who golf do not shoot (legit) below 100 and dont do it consistantly. I have heard many times for many yeras that if one shoots 90's consistantly enough that they are better than probably 80 to 90% of "all" golfers. This suggests if one shoots 90's fairly consistantly then they (when considering "all" golfers) are in about a 10-20% golfing population.
Perhaps more or less there but I just dont know how accurate the suggestion really is. Reason i bring it up is that so many people seem to pick up this game and within a short time frame are shooting somewhat consistant 90's golf. Often are stating such scoring within less than a season or even within just a few months. Not picking on anyone at all and I know that some people are gifted and may posess good natural ability in this game to obtain decent developement more quickly than others. It does happen for sure but it is mentioned time again by so many people that it leads me to believe the suggested statistic may actually be way off line.
Leads to believe that if your "not" shooting 90's golf within the first year/few months of playing that it is actually you who may not be with as much as a majority as suggested and shooting fairly consistant 90's golf doesnt really put you in any smaller percentile of ability. I admit that i am jealous of the amount of people who walk into this game and in short time frames (sometimes just months) are maintining 90's golf. Can be at or better than my level after 20yrs of playing. Its an ego defalter (lol) but i live with it and more power to them. But if one doesnt play 90's golf in the first year or even two are they really still in the majority as suggested or are many more shooting fairly consistant 90's than is suggested? Or perhaps are too many people simply just full of it? When/how long did it take you to shoot in the 90's and then when was it done on a consistant basis? Do you think the percenatge of 90's golfers is much much higher than is suggested? is it not really the accomplishment we credited ourselves for doing because so many seem to do it and get it done reletively quickly?
Perhaps more or less there but I just dont know how accurate the suggestion really is. Reason i bring it up is that so many people seem to pick up this game and within a short time frame are shooting somewhat consistant 90's golf. Often are stating such scoring within less than a season or even within just a few months. Not picking on anyone at all and I know that some people are gifted and may posess good natural ability in this game to obtain decent developement more quickly than others. It does happen for sure but it is mentioned time again by so many people that it leads me to believe the suggested statistic may actually be way off line.
Leads to believe that if your "not" shooting 90's golf within the first year/few months of playing that it is actually you who may not be with as much as a majority as suggested and shooting fairly consistant 90's golf doesnt really put you in any smaller percentile of ability. I admit that i am jealous of the amount of people who walk into this game and in short time frames (sometimes just months) are maintining 90's golf. Can be at or better than my level after 20yrs of playing. Its an ego defalter (lol) but i live with it and more power to them. But if one doesnt play 90's golf in the first year or even two are they really still in the majority as suggested or are many more shooting fairly consistant 90's than is suggested? Or perhaps are too many people simply just full of it? When/how long did it take you to shoot in the 90's and then when was it done on a consistant basis? Do you think the percenatge of 90's golfers is much much higher than is suggested? is it not really the accomplishment we credited ourselves for doing because so many seem to do it and get it done reletively quickly?