Song Dog
Well-known member
What is the weight of the TFC that Ping uses in the G30 drivers? Regular flex
Thanks
Thanks
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What is it you are trying to accomplish by going to a slightly heavier shaft?OK thanks.
Let's say I find a shaft that's 60s. Would I even see a real benefit in 5 more in weight.
Since I read somewhere that Ping purty much has things set up in shaft weight, would I be better off not messing with it?
I was told a little heavier shaft can help with getting a touch more swing speed.............then my mind starts to turn.
I guess, depending on one's swing (and confidence in the swing), that's possible. Strictly from a weight perspective, (generalization coming...) less weight could lead to the potential for more swing speed. If you can, I would still recommend to get both options (hopefully with the same club head) onto a monitor and on the course from the same positions.
I have been known to dabble in various club heads and shafts (understatement). I used to be one who swore I needed a fairway wood shaft in the 80-ish gram range, a driver shaft in the 60-ish gram range, and iron shafts 120+ grams. After going through a fitting, I was wrong. For my driver, I now focus on shafts sub-70, for sure, and fairway woods sub-80, for sure. In irons, I went to sub-110 grams, and currently have a set being re-shafted with sub-100 gram shafts. The potential for more club head speed is there. But, what I have found is that the lighter shafts have: 1) Made it easier for me to get similar distances to what I was trying to reach with heavier shafts and 2) Much less wear-and-tear, and less fatigue, later in the round, or especially later in a day where I am trying to get in multiple rounds.
If I could find a driver shaft sub-60, which I was able to hit at least as well as my current driver shaft, I'd jump on it, personally.